NAVR Backs Legal Challenge to California Law Restricting Veterans’ Right to Choose

WASHINGTON--(BUSINESS WIRE)--The National Association for Veterans Rights (NAVR) today welcomed a federal challenge to California Senate Bill 694 (SB 694), saying the case underscores a principle NAVR has consistently championed: Veterans deserve strong consumer protections without sacrificing their freedom to choose how they pursue the benefits they earned.

Veteran Benefits Guide, Veterans Guardian, and two California Veterans filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California challenging SB 694, which is scheduled to take effect January 1, 2027. The federal challenge seeks to stop the law from taking effect, arguing the law would strip California Veterans of the freedom to choose trusted, independent assistance in pursuing the disability benefits they earned.

The lawsuit raises significant constitutional and federal-law questions, alleging that SB 694 violates First Amendment rights involving speech, association, and the right to petition the government. It also argues the law conflicts with Congress’s 2006 decision to repeal a previous federal blanket prohibition on compensated claims assistance.

“This case is about something much larger than any one company or business model,” said Peter O’Rourke, President of NAVR. “It is about whether Veterans retain the right to make informed decisions about how they pursue the benefits they earned. We can protect Veterans from bad actors through strong standards, transparency, reasonable fee limitations and meaningful enforcement without eliminating legitimate choices altogether.”

The challenge also highlights the practical reality that Veterans need more options, not fewer. The complaint cites approximately 1.4 million Veterans in California but only about 540 accredited VSO representatives, while also describing staffing constraints, heavy caseloads and delays facing some Veterans seeking assistance.

The filing follows federal appellate scrutiny of similar restrictions in New Jersey, where the Third Circuit concluded Veterans Guardian was likely to succeed on its First Amendment challenge.

More than a dozen other states have demonstrated that a different approach is possible by establishing targeted consumer protections while preserving access to free-market assistance.

NAVR’s position remains clear: Veteran protection and Veteran choice are not competing principles. Good public policy should accomplish both.

About NAVR:

The National Association for Veterans Rights (NAVR) is a national trade association committed to promoting ethical and transparent business practices among companies engaging with the service-disabled Veteran community. NAVR advocates for businesses that empower Veterans with professional and transparent solutions while advancing support for Veteran-owned businesses.