-

Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy Announces a Proposed $250 Million Settlement in Apple AI False Advertising Case

SAN FRANCISCO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, along with co-lead counsel Kaplan Fox and Clarkson, filed a motion today asking the District Court to preliminarily approve a $250,000,000 Settlement with Apple Inc. in a nationwide false advertising class action concerning “Apple Intelligence” on iPhones. Plaintiffs claim that Apple saturated the market with advertising presenting the iPhone 16, and certain models of the iPhone 15, as a breakthrough in artificial intelligence. According to the complaint, the centerpiece of this marketing campaign was a dramatically enhanced AI-powered Siri personal assistant that could integrate information across apps. As alleged, millions of consumers purchased iPhones based on these ads; however, Apple failed to deliver the promised features.

Under the proposed Settlement, U.S. consumers and businesses who purchased an eligible iPhone during the Class Period (June 10, 2024 to March 29, 2025), and submit a valid claim, will be entitled to a cash payment for each device. In agreeing to the Settlement, Apple does not admit to liability and denies having engaged in any wrongdoing.

U.S. District Court Judge Noël Wise will now consider whether the proposed Settlement is appropriate. If preliminary approval is granted, Notice of the Settlement will go out to all members of the nationwide Class.

According to Brian Danitz, a partner at Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, and Interim Co-Lead Counsel for the proposed Class: “This $250 Million proposed settlement is one of the largest in a false advertising case. If approved by the Court, the settlement will provide timely relief to consumers and companies nationwide for Apple’s alleged failure to deliver the AI enhanced Siri features as advertised.”

The case is Landsheft v. Apple Inc., 5:25-cv-02668-NW, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The Motion for Preliminary Approval was filed on May 5, 2026.

COTCHETT, PITRE & McCARTHY

Joseph W. Cotchett

Brian Danitz

Karin B. Swope

Blaire V. Kittle

Elle D. Lewis

Caroline A. Yuen

 

KAPLAN FOX

Laurence King

Frederick Fox

Matthew George

Blair E. Reed

Clarissa Olivares

 

CLARKSON LAW FIRM, P.C.

Ryan J. Clarkson Yana Hart

Tim Giordano

Bryan P. Thompson

 

 

Contacts

Brian Danitz
Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, LLP
(650) 697-6000
bdanitz@cpmlegal.com

Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy


Release Versions

Contacts

Brian Danitz
Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, LLP
(650) 697-6000
bdanitz@cpmlegal.com

More News From Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy

Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy Announces Opening of $250 Million Apple AI False Advertising Settlement Claims Period

SAN JOSE, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy announced today the beginning of the 90-day Notice Period during which Class Members can submit their claims in this landmark settlement. On July 17, 2026, Judge Noël Wise of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California granted preliminary approval of this $250,000,000 Settlement with Apple in this nationwide false advertising class action concerning “Apple Intelligence” on iPhones. Plaintiffs allege that Apple...

Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy Files Lawsuit Against Logitech Over Tariff Refunds Which the Company Has Not Returned to Customers

SAN JOSE, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--On August 18, 2026, Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, LLP (“CPM”) filed a class action lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose Division, against Logitech Inc. (“Logitech”), on behalf of a proposed nationwide class of consumers who purchased Logitech products at prices the company quietly inflated to cover the costs of tariffs, now reimbursed by the federal government. The complaint alleges that Logitech raised U.S. re...

Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy Announces Bank of America Must Face Trial in California Pandemic Unemployment Benefits Litigation

SAN DIEGO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy announces today, August 18, 2026, that Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel of the U.S. District Court in San Diego issued a 105-page order denying Bank of America’s motion for summary judgment in this long-running Multi-District Litigation class action. The lawsuit seeks to hold the Bank accountable for violating state and federal laws for more than 100,000 Californians who received unemployment and disability benefits through Bank-issued prepaid d...
Back to Newsroom