-

Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy Announces a Proposed $250 Million Settlement in Apple AI False Advertising Case

SAN FRANCISCO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, along with co-lead counsel Kaplan Fox and Clarkson, filed a motion today asking the District Court to preliminarily approve a $250,000,000 Settlement with Apple Inc. in a nationwide false advertising class action concerning “Apple Intelligence” on iPhones. Plaintiffs claim that Apple saturated the market with advertising presenting the iPhone 16, and certain models of the iPhone 15, as a breakthrough in artificial intelligence. According to the complaint, the centerpiece of this marketing campaign was a dramatically enhanced AI-powered Siri personal assistant that could integrate information across apps. As alleged, millions of consumers purchased iPhones based on these ads; however, Apple failed to deliver the promised features.

Under the proposed Settlement, U.S. consumers and businesses who purchased an eligible iPhone during the Class Period (June 10, 2024 to March 29, 2025), and submit a valid claim, will be entitled to a cash payment for each device. In agreeing to the Settlement, Apple does not admit to liability and denies having engaged in any wrongdoing.

U.S. District Court Judge Noël Wise will now consider whether the proposed Settlement is appropriate. If preliminary approval is granted, Notice of the Settlement will go out to all members of the nationwide Class.

According to Brian Danitz, a partner at Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, and Interim Co-Lead Counsel for the proposed Class: “This $250 Million proposed settlement is one of the largest in a false advertising case. If approved by the Court, the settlement will provide timely relief to consumers and companies nationwide for Apple’s alleged failure to deliver the AI enhanced Siri features as advertised.”

The case is Landsheft v. Apple Inc., 5:25-cv-02668-NW, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The Motion for Preliminary Approval was filed on May 5, 2026.

COTCHETT, PITRE & McCARTHY

Joseph W. Cotchett

Brian Danitz

Karin B. Swope

Blaire V. Kittle

Elle D. Lewis

Caroline A. Yuen

 

KAPLAN FOX

Laurence King

Frederick Fox

Matthew George

Blair E. Reed

Clarissa Olivares

 

CLARKSON LAW FIRM, P.C.

Ryan J. Clarkson Yana Hart

Tim Giordano

Bryan P. Thompson

 

 

Contacts

Brian Danitz
Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, LLP
(650) 697-6000
bdanitz@cpmlegal.com

Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy


Release Versions

Contacts

Brian Danitz
Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, LLP
(650) 697-6000
bdanitz@cpmlegal.com

More News From Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy

Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy Files Class Action Lawsuit Against Educational Testing Service for Unlawfully Exposing Private Information of California Students

SAN FRANCISCO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, LLP (“CPM”) filed a class action lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, against Educational Testing Service (“ETS”), on behalf of a proposed class of current and former K-12 California students who had their private information exposed as a result of ETS’ failure to implement adequate data security protections. On October 16, 2026, ETS announced that hackers had breached its systems and obtained...

Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy Announces Lawsuit Filed Against Levi Strauss Over Millions in Tariff Refunds the Company Has Not Returned to Customers

SAN FRANCISCO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, LLP (“CPM”) filed a class action lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, San Francisco Division, against Levi Strauss & Co. (“Levi”), on behalf of a proposed nationwide class of consumers who bought Levi products at prices the company quietly raised to cover the costs of tariffs. After the Supreme Court ruled on February 20, 2026 that those tariffs were unlawful, the federal government is now...

Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy Announces Class Action Against GoPro Over Unreturned Tariff Refunds

SAN FRANCISCO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, LLP (“CPM”) filed a class action lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, San Francisco Division, against GoPro, Inc. (“GoPro”), on behalf of a proposed nationwide class of consumers who bought GoPro products at prices the company raised to cover the costs of tariffs. The federal government is now refunding those tariffs with interest.The complaint alleges that on February 3, 2025, one day before t...
Back to Newsroom