-

Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, LLP Announces Judge Orders Trial For Case Brought By Parents Of Saugus High School Students Killed In Campus Shooting, Rejecting School District’s Defense That It Had No Duty To Protect The Students

SAN FRANCISCO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, LLP announces a joint lawsuit brought by the parents of two Saugus High School students killed in a November 4, 2019, on-campus shooting will proceed to trial, according to the ruling issued by the Los Angeles Superior Court. Trial will likely begin in January 2024. The parents of Gracie Muehlberger and Dominic Blackwell allege that the Hart Union High School District had no program in place to identify and intervene with troubled students and, as a result, missed numerous red flags associated with the suicidal student who committed the murders. They also allege the District did not adequately supervise or secure the school campus.

The District had argued that it had no duty to protect the students and that the shooting was unforeseeable, both arguments rejected by the Court. The Court held that the general awareness of potential campus gun violence and need for safety protocols is the baseline foundation for the District’s specific duty to enact protections for student-on-student gun violence. It further held that the District’s argument that it could deny that ongoing threat unless and until a shooting occurred “myopically” limited the debate over campus safety requirements and “obtusely” denied an ongoing well-documented concern. The Court further recognized the vast difference between the resources required to help a single student in distress versus the outlays required to increase overall campus security.

“The Judge has made clear that a school district cannot turn a blind eye to the risks of potential violence from troubled teenagers and inadequate campus supervision and security. It will now be a jury’s job to determine if the Hart Union High School District failed in its duty to protect the students whose lives were tragically lost in this foreseeable shooting by a suicidal student who was able to carry a gun onto campus through an unmonitored gate. We believe the jury will find that the school simply failed in its duty to ensure that personnel were watching over the campus and students that day.” Julie Fieber, a partner at Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, LLP.

The case is filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court. Case No. 20STCV43946 consolidated with Case No. 20STCV44103.

About Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, LLP

Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, LLP engages exclusively in litigation and trials and has earned a national reputation for its dedication to prosecuting or defending socially just actions. To learn more about the firm, visit www.cpmlegal.com.

Contacts

Julie Fieber
Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, LLP
Burlingame Office
(415) 846-8759
jfieber@cpmlegal.com

Nick Hane
California Employment Counsel, Inc.
Costa Mesa, California
(714) 328-0672
nhane@employment-counsel.com

CPM MEDIA CONTACT:
Lee Houskeeper
San Francisco Stories
(415) 777-4700
Cell: (415) 654-9141
Newsservice@aol.com
615 Burnett Avenue, Suite 2, San Francisco, CA 94131

Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, LLP


Release Versions

Contacts

Julie Fieber
Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, LLP
Burlingame Office
(415) 846-8759
jfieber@cpmlegal.com

Nick Hane
California Employment Counsel, Inc.
Costa Mesa, California
(714) 328-0672
nhane@employment-counsel.com

CPM MEDIA CONTACT:
Lee Houskeeper
San Francisco Stories
(415) 777-4700
Cell: (415) 654-9141
Newsservice@aol.com
615 Burnett Avenue, Suite 2, San Francisco, CA 94131

More News From Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, LLP

Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy Announces Opening of $250 Million Apple AI False Advertising Settlement Claims Period

SAN JOSE, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy announced today the beginning of the 90-day Notice Period during which Class Members can submit their claims in this landmark settlement. On July 17, 2026, Judge Noël Wise of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California granted preliminary approval of this $250,000,000 Settlement with Apple in this nationwide false advertising class action concerning “Apple Intelligence” on iPhones. Plaintiffs allege that Apple...

Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy Files Lawsuit Against Logitech Over Tariff Refunds Which the Company Has Not Returned to Customers

SAN JOSE, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--On August 18, 2026, Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, LLP (“CPM”) filed a class action lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose Division, against Logitech Inc. (“Logitech”), on behalf of a proposed nationwide class of consumers who purchased Logitech products at prices the company quietly inflated to cover the costs of tariffs, now reimbursed by the federal government. The complaint alleges that Logitech raised U.S. re...

Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy Announces Bank of America Must Face Trial in California Pandemic Unemployment Benefits Litigation

SAN DIEGO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy announces today, August 18, 2026, that Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel of the U.S. District Court in San Diego issued a 105-page order denying Bank of America’s motion for summary judgment in this long-running Multi-District Litigation class action. The lawsuit seeks to hold the Bank accountable for violating state and federal laws for more than 100,000 Californians who received unemployment and disability benefits through Bank-issued prepaid d...
Back to Newsroom