-

Hagens Berman: Class-Action Lawsuit Says Tesla’s Automatic Software Updates Derate Batteries, Violate Computer Fraud and Abuse Act

Tesla Model S and Model X drivers sue for non-consensual software updates causing 20% decrease in vehicle driving range, battery failure

SAN FRANCISCO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Tesla owners and lessors today filed a nationwide class-action lawsuit against the automaker, following reports that Tesla’s automatic software updates to the Model S and Model X cause a 20% decrease in driving range and leave some class members to pay $15,000 or more for a new battery, according to Hagens Berman.

The lawsuit, filed on May 12, 2023, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, claims affected Teslas are “protected computers” under the definition outlined in the federal Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, and that the automatic updates which have led to decreased battery performance and battery failure violate consumers’ rights under the law.

If you own or lease a Tesla Model S or Model X, find out more about the lawsuit and sign up.

“Tesla owners and lessors are uniquely at the mercy of the maker of their cars, and Tesla imposes software updates without consent whenever their vehicle is connected to Wi-Fi,” said Steve Berman, managing partner at Hagens Berman and attorney representing Tesla owners and lessors in the lawsuit. “We believe Tesla defrauds consumers and abuses this feature of its vehicles’ design, and it’s time to show Tesla that it’s not above the law.”

Tesla Admits Software Updates Cause Battery Drain

Attorneys say Tesla denies reimbursement to Model S and Model X owners and lessors who experience reduced battery capacity following a software update. The automaker has not, however, denied the relationship between software updates and decreased battery performance in prior litigation, according to today’s lawsuit.

In a 2019 class action against Tesla, the automaker did not bother to challenge allegations that an update had imposed an “artificial, software induced limitation” on the battery capacity of class vehicles. Instead, Tesla moved almost immediately to settlement negotiations with vehicle owners. That case also highlights a supporting declaration from Tesla’s counsel which openly admits to a 10% decrease in battery performance following a May 2019 software update.

Typically, attorneys say, when an automaker wants to perform a software update of any kind on a vehicle, it notifies drivers and describes the reason for the update. This gives customers the opportunity to choose whether to receive the update and ask questions about potential effects. Because Tesla can issue automatic updates whenever the vehicle is connected to Wi-Fi, and Tesla tells consumers that the software updates cannot be cancelled or reversed, Model S and Model X owners and lessors are left to believe they have no recourse if they encounter unwanted consequences as the result of a Tesla software update.

The lawsuit emphasizes that battery performance and longevity is at the heart of Tesla’s marketing, and states that the company, “represents that its batteries will outlast the vehicles themselves.” But some drivers have been told they must pay $15,000 or more for a new battery after an automatic software update leaves the old one completely inoperable, according to attorneys. The lawsuit states, “At no point during the process does Tesla warn drivers that software updates pushed onto the vehicles will result in the depletion of battery life, which – according to Tesla, are designed to last the life of the vehicle.”

“The fact that Tesla touts battery performance as a defining feature of its vehicles makes Tesla’s own software updates a particularly egregious violation of consumer rights,” Berman said. “It’s time to hit the brakes on Tesla’s unchecked exploitation of its own customers.”

In addition to claims that Tesla has violated the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, the lawsuit also brings claims of violation of the California Unfair Competition Law and the Consumer Legal Remedies Act.

Learn more about the case against Tesla for automatic software updates leading to battery deration.

About Hagens Berman

Hagens Berman is a global plaintiffs’ rights complex litigation law firm with a tenacious drive for achieving real results for those harmed by corporate negligence and fraud. Since its founding in 1993, the firm’s determination has earned it numerous national accolades, awards and titles of “Most Feared Plaintiff’s Firm,” MVPs and Trailblazers of class-action law. More about the law firm and its successes can be found at www.hbsslaw.com. Follow the firm for updates and news at @ClassActionLaw.

Contacts

Ash Klann
pr@hbsslaw.com
206-268-9363

Hagens Berman

NASDAQ:TSLA

Release Summary
Tesla owners filed a lawsuit over Tesla’s automatic software updates that can cause decreased range and battery issues, according to Hagens Berman.
Release Versions
$Cashtags

Contacts

Ash Klann
pr@hbsslaw.com
206-268-9363

Social Media Profiles
More News From Hagens Berman

Hagens Berman: Consumers Sue Valve Corporation Claiming Illegal Gambling Enterprise in Video Game Loot Boxes

SEATTLE--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Hagens Berman, on behalf of a proposed class of consumers nationwide, today announced the filing of a class-action lawsuit against Valve Corporation, the Washington-based developer behind some of the world’s most popular video games. The lawsuit, filed March 9, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington, accuses Valve of knowingly operating unlawful gambling through its loot box system, a feature the lawsuit alleges was carefully engineered...

Hagens Berman: DC Water Sued in Class-Action Lawsuit Following Disastrous January Sewage Spill into Potomac River

WASHINGTON--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Following a 243-million-gallon sewage spill into Washington, D.C.’s Potomac River, owners of local property and vessels have filed a proposed class-action lawsuit against District of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority, according to environmental attorneys at Hagens Berman seeking damages for alleged oversight. The lawsuit was filed March 6, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland and claims DC Water “failed to implement adequate interim safegua...

Hagens Berman: Volkswagen Dealerships Sue Automaker Alleging Illegal Conspiracy to Offer Direct-to-Consumer EVs Under New Scout Brand

MCLEAN, Va.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Volkswagen dealerships filed a class-action lawsuit alleging VW skirted contracts by selling its Scout EVs directly to consumers, says Hagens Berman....
Back to Newsroom