-

Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy and Bottini & Bottini File Securities Class Action Lawsuit on Behalf of TWITTER Investors Who Sold Stock After Musk’s Notice of Terminating Twitter Deal (NYSE: “TWTR”)

BURLINGAME, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy (www.cpmlegal.com), and Bottini & Bottini announce that they have filed a class action lawsuit against Elon Musk on behalf of all persons who sold the common stock and securities of TWITTER, Inc. (NYSE: “TWTR”) at any time between May 13, 2022 and October 4, 2022 (the “Class Period”). The lawsuit, captioned Pampena v. Elon Musk, Case No. 3:22-cv-05937, is pending in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.

The lawsuit alleges that Elon Musk violated Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by issuing false statements about his purchase of Twitter, Inc., including false claims that Twitter had breached the terms of the merger agreement. Among other things, the complaint alleges that, on May 13, 2022, Musk issued misleading tweets claiming that the merger was “temporarily on hold.” On May 17, 2022, Musk issued another tweet stating that the merger “cannot go forward” until Twitter showed him proof of the number of “fake accounts” on its platform. Thereafter, between July 8, 2022 and September 9, 2022, Musk issued three separate notices purporting to terminate the merger. The complaint alleges that these statements falsely claimed that Twitter had breached the terms of the merger agreement by, among other things, not giving him documents about spam and bots.

The complaint alleges that Musk’s statements were false because (1) Musk had waived due diligence under the merger agreement; (2) Musk was aware of issues relating to bots and spam on Twitter’s platform and had even vowed to eliminate the bots after he acquired Twitter; and (3) Musk did not have a justifiable reason to delay or terminate the merger. As alleged in the complaint, Musk was making these misleading statements in an attempt to get out of the deal, delay the merger with the intention that he might get a better price, or in the hopes that the price of Tesla stock would increase before he was forced to sell his shares to fund the merger.

Then, on October 4, 2022, less than two weeks before Musk was set to go to trial in Delaware over the merger, Musk issued a statement indicating he would proceed with the purchase of Twitter at the original purchase price of $54.20 per share. The announcement shocked the stock market and caused the price of Twitter stock to increase by 22% in one day. However, as the complaint alleges, Twitter stockholders – who sold their Twitter stock based on Musk’s false statements about the merger – were damaged by selling Twitter stock at prices artificially depressed by Musk’s conduct.

If you have any questions regarding your rights related to this action or have information relevant to the claims asserted in the complaint, please contact Tyson Redenbarger of Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy at (650) 697-6000 or tredenbarger@cpmlegal.com.

Contacts

Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy
Tyson Redenbarger, Esq.
Email: tredenbarger@cpmlegal.com
Tel: (650) 697-6000
www.cpmlegal.com/inquiry

Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy

NYSE:TWTR

Release Versions

Contacts

Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy
Tyson Redenbarger, Esq.
Email: tredenbarger@cpmlegal.com
Tel: (650) 697-6000
www.cpmlegal.com/inquiry

More News From Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy

Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy Files Lawsuit Against Logitech Over Tariff Refunds Which the Company Has Not Returned to Customers

SAN JOSE, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--On August 18, 2026, Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, LLP (“CPM”) filed a class action lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose Division, against Logitech Inc. (“Logitech”), on behalf of a proposed nationwide class of consumers who purchased Logitech products at prices the company quietly inflated to cover the costs of tariffs, now reimbursed by the federal government. The complaint alleges that Logitech raised U.S. re...

Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy Announces Bank of America Must Face Trial in California Pandemic Unemployment Benefits Litigation

SAN DIEGO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy announces today, August 18, 2026, that Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel of the U.S. District Court in San Diego issued a 105-page order denying Bank of America’s motion for summary judgment in this long-running Multi-District Litigation class action. The lawsuit seeks to hold the Bank accountable for violating state and federal laws for more than 100,000 Californians who received unemployment and disability benefits through Bank-issued prepaid d...

Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy Announces a San Mateo County Jury Awards $33 Million to Young Girls Whose Parents Were Killed by 17-Year-Old Who Was Street Racing; Street Racer’s Parents Also Liable

REDWOOD CITY, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy announces on August 11, 2026, a San Mateo County jury awarded $33 million to two 11-year-old girls whose parents, Greg Ammen and Grace Spiridon, were killed while their vehicle was turning left on El Camino Real in Redwood City on November 4, 2022. Defendant Cesar Morales, then 17 years old, was engaged in a street race that night and struck the Ammen vehicle. The parents of Cesar Morales, Arnold Morales and Susana Salto Alva...
Back to Newsroom