-

Hagens Berman: Volkswagen Dealerships Sue Automaker Alleging Illegal Conspiracy to Offer Direct-to-Consumer EVs Under New Scout Brand

Class action accuses VW of skirting legal responsibilities as 150,000+ vehicles have been reserved for purchase already

MCLEAN, Va.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Two Volkswagen dealerships lodged a class-action lawsuit at VW accusing the automaker of attempting to skirt its legal obligations by selling its new Scout-brand electric vehicles directly to consumers, according to Hagens Berman.

“It appears that VW has violated its own contract with its dealerships, the very businesses that serve its brand, and we intend to uphold the contractual rights of these small businesses.”

Share

The lawsuit was filed March 3, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia and states, “To avoid these obligations, VW formed separate companies (defendants Scout Motors, Inc. and Scout Motor Sales LLC) to effectively act as shell corporations for distribution. In truth, Scout is simply an offshoot of Volkswagen, and Volkswagen’s decision to sell the Scout EVs is a blatant breach of its contract with the dealers.”

Sunrise Imports LLC of Long Island, New York and Curran Volkswagen Inc. of Stratford, Connecticut bring claims on behalf of a proposed class of all US persons and entities who own or operate a Volkswagen dealership via a Volkswagen Dealer Agreement. Dealership owners may contact the firm for more information about their rights.

The firm has brought prior successful litigation against Volkswagen on behalf of dealership owners when it achieved a $1.2 billion settlement in the aftermath of the Dieselgate emissions-cheating litigation, in which the firm also played a leadership role, culminating in a separate $14.7 billion settlement, the largest ever achieved against an automaker. Additionally, the firm represented FCA dealership owners against the automaker for practices that allegedly harmed dealers.

“We believe Volkswagen was fully aware of its legal responsibilities to dealership owners when it chose to sell Scout vehicles directly to consumers online,” said Steve W. Berman, managing partner and co-founder of Hagens Berman. “It appears that VW has violated its own contract with its dealerships, the very businesses that serve its brand, and we intend to uphold the contractual rights of these small businesses.”

Scout’s Direct Sales Campaign

Scout’s website offers would-be buyers the chance to purchase EVs by paying to “reserve your spot in line” pre-production, prompting users to select their vehicles from available models and features. According to the lawsuit, over 150,000 individuals have already paid for reservations to purchase Scout vehicles.

“VW dealerships are accordingly being deprived of their right and ability to sell these cutting-edge vehicles, at significant financial cost to the dealers,” the lawsuit states.

Per the standard Dealer Agreement, and accompanying “Standard Provisions” document, Volkswagen is prohibited from selling directly to consumers.

“Not only are the dealers losing their opportunity to collect $100 from every purchaser and make a profit from the vehicle’s sale, they are also injured by lost opportunities to finance, service and repair the vehicles, and to cross-sale these and other VW vehicles, both now and in the future,” according to the lawsuit.

Volkswagen’s Speedbump

The lawsuit cites contractual language from the Volkswagen Dealer Agreement stating plainly, “VWoA will sell and deliver Authorized Products to Dealer in accordance with this Agreement,” and “In the conduct of its business, VWoA will: …Avoid all discourteous, deceptive, misleading, unprofessional or unethical practices.” By refusing to sell “Authorized Products” to dealers, Volkswagen has breached its agreement, the lawsuit states.

According to the lawsuit, Volkswagen sought to shirk its legal responsibilities “based on the fiction that Scout is separate from Volkswagen,” when in fact the brand was wholly obtained by Volkswagen AG when it acquired American truck manufacturer International Motors (Navistar) in 2021.

As cited in the lawsuit, Scout’s CEO, Scott Keogh, stated publicly in a recent podcast, “100% Scout Motors is part of the Volkswagen Group... Scout Motors is a [sic] LLC, and reports into the Volkswagen Group directly in Germany.”

The lawsuit brings claims of breach of contract, tortious interference with business relations and conspiracy to injure a business relationship and seeks damages (including punitive and treble damages) and injunctive relief ending the behavior in question.

Find out more about the firm’s lawsuit against Volkswagen and Scout Motors.

About Hagens Berman

Hagens Berman is a global plaintiffs’ rights complex litigation law firm with a tenacious drive for achieving real results for those harmed by corporate negligence and fraud. Since its founding in 1993, the firm’s determination has earned it numerous national accolades, awards and titles of “Most Feared Plaintiff’s Firm,” MVPs and Trailblazers of class-action law. More about the law firm and its successes can be found at hbsslaw.com. Follow the firm for updates and news at @ClassActionLaw.

Contacts

Media Contact
Ash Klann
pr@hbsslaw.com
206-623-9363

Hagens Berman

Pink Limited:VWAGY

Release Summary
Volkswagen dealerships filed a class-action lawsuit alleging VW skirted contracts by selling its Scout EVs directly to consumers, says Hagens Berman.
Release Versions

Contacts

Media Contact
Ash Klann
pr@hbsslaw.com
206-623-9363

Social Media Profiles
More News From Hagens Berman

Hagens Berman: Judge Denies Motions to Dismiss Groundwater Contamination Lawsuit Against Port of Morrow and Commercial Operators

PENDLETON, Ore.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--A judge denied motions to dismiss a lawsuit alleging nitrate contamination of groundwater in Oregon’s Lower Umatilla Basin according to Hagens Berman....

Attorneys at Hagens Berman Announce $474M Win in Amitiza Jury Trial Against Takeda

BOSTON--(BUSINESS WIRE)--A class-action lawsuit regarding Amitiza ended today when a jury found Takeda Pharmaceuticals liable for $474 million, according to Hagens Berman....

Hagens Berman: Consumers Sue Amazon Alleging Unlawful Price Hikes to Cover Tariff Costs

SEATTLE--(BUSINESS WIRE)--A consumer-protection lawsuit from Seattle-based law firm Hagens Berman accuses Amazon.com of collecting funds from millions of its customers in response to since invalidated tariffs, passing the buck on rising costs through higher prices. The lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington on May 15, 2026, and states that in February 2025 when the Trump administration began imposing tariffs on imported goods under the International...
Back to Newsroom