-

Major Plastic Consumer Goods Companies Must Face Pollution Lawsuit Impacting California Waterways

SAN FRANCISCO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Late last week, after over two years of litigation, Earth Island Institute, represented by Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, received an order from the San Mateo County Superior Court allowing its landmark lawsuit to proceed against 10 major plastic consumer goods companies for the nuisance allegedly created by their plastic packaging, including polluting California waterways with plastic trash and touting products as recyclable when they’re not.

Judge V. Raymond Swope of the San Mateo County Superior Court denied the out-of-state defendants’ motion to dismiss the case and ruled that California courts had personal jurisdiction over the defendants. The court ruled that it has the authority to hear this case in California, where the harms described in Earth Island’s complaint occurred, and not merely where the defendants are based. The decision means that Earth Island’s claims can proceed toward the merits in California, and Earth Island won’t be forced to bring separate lawsuits against these companies in states across the country.

Mark Molumphy, a partner at Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, and lead counsel for Earth Island, said:

“Earth Island is to be commended for taking on these corporate giants. While just the first step in a long journey, last week’s order is an important victory and brings us closer to fixing an environmental disaster for the public, that just gets worse with each passing day.”

Tyson Redenbarger of Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, added:

“Global plastic producers who cause harm in California should be held accountable in California. We look forward to presenting the case to a California jury.”

Sumona Majumdar, Earth Island Institute’s general counsel, said:

“Last week’s ruling correctly finds that companies marketing, selling, and profiting from products packaged in plastic in California can also be sued in California for the harms caused by their plastic packaging. Corporations like Coca-Cola and PepsiCo can’t be allowed to hide behind their out-of-state status to avoid accountability for their role in the plastic pollution crisis here in California.”

The lawsuit was filed in February 2020 in San Mateo County Superior Court in California, against Crystal Geyser Water Company; The Clorox Company; The Coca-Cola Company; PepsiCo, Inc.; Nestlé USA, Inc. (now BlueTriton Brands); Mars, Incorporated; Danone North America; Mondelez International, Inc.; Colgate-Palmolive Company; and The Procter & Gamble Company. The case alleges violations of public nuisance, breach of express warranty, negligence, failure to warn of the harms caused by their plastic packaging and California Consumers Legal Remedies Act. The defendants tried to move the case to federal court but were unsuccessful. By denying the out-of-state defendants’ motion to quash, this ruling allows the case to proceed toward the merits and a trial.

About: Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, LLP

Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy engages exclusively in litigation and trials and has a national reputation for its dedication to prosecuting or defending socially just and deserving legal actions. To learn more about the firm, visit www.cpmlegal.com.

About: Earth Island Institute

For almost forty years, Earth Island Institute, a leading nonprofit environmental organization based in Berkeley, California, has been developing programs and supporting projects that counteract threats to the planet’s biological and cultural diversity. Earth Island also plays a leading role in efforts to fight plastic pollution and protect our oceans, coasts, and marine life.

A copy of the order can be found here. A copy of the complaint filed in this lawsuit can be found here.

Contacts

Mark Molumphy, Cotchett Pitre & McCarthy
mmolumphy@cpmlegal.com, (650) 259-3224

Tyson Redenbarger, Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy
tredenbarger@cpmlegal.com, (650) 259-3228

Julia Q. Peng, Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy
jpeng@cpmlegal.com, (650) 259-3226

Media:
Lee Housekeeper
(415) 654-9141 - Cell
NewsService@aol.com

Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, LLP


Release Versions

Contacts

Mark Molumphy, Cotchett Pitre & McCarthy
mmolumphy@cpmlegal.com, (650) 259-3224

Tyson Redenbarger, Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy
tredenbarger@cpmlegal.com, (650) 259-3228

Julia Q. Peng, Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy
jpeng@cpmlegal.com, (650) 259-3226

Media:
Lee Housekeeper
(415) 654-9141 - Cell
NewsService@aol.com

More News From Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, LLP

Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy Announces a San Mateo County Jury Awards $33 Million to Young Girls Whose Parents Were Killed by 17-Year-Old Who Was Street Racing; Street Racer’s Parents Also Liable

REDWOOD CITY, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy announces on August 11, 2026, a San Mateo County jury awarded $33 million to two 11-year-old girls whose parents, Greg Ammen and Grace Spiridon, were killed while their vehicle was turning left on El Camino Real in Redwood City on November 4, 2022. Defendant Cesar Morales, then 17 years old, was engaged in a street race that night and struck the Ammen vehicle. The parents of Cesar Morales, Arnold Morales and Susana Salto Alva...

Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy Files First Direct Purchaser Antitrust Class Action Challenging Alleged Global Shipping Container Cartel

BURLINGAME, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy “CPM” has filed the nation's first direct purchaser antitrust class action seeking to hold some of the world's largest shipping container manufacturers accountable for an alleged conspiracy to restrict output and fix prices for standard dry shipping containers sold throughout the United States.On June 24, 2026, Atlantic Coast Container, Inc., represented by CPM, filed a class action complaint in the United States District Court...

Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy Announces Federal Court Grants Final Approval of “Historic” Discrimination Settlement with Wells Fargo

SAN FRANCISCO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy announces today, May 15, 2026, Judge Trina Thompson of the United States District Court in the Northern District of California granted final approval of the historic $110 million settlement reached in In re Wells Fargo & Co. Consolidated Derivative Shareholder Litigation, a seminal derivative lawsuit brought by Wells Fargo shareholders that essentially combined two cases into one, and alleged that the Bank’s Board of Directors b...
Back to Newsroom