-

Major Victory for California Dairy Civil War

SACRAMENTO, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--A decisive victory for small family dairy farms was won this week in what has been called a civil war in the California dairy industry. In a proceeding before The California Department of Food and Agriculture, Administrative Law Judge Timothy J. Aspinwall issued a much-awaited decision on a petition that could have put hundreds of California family dairy farms out of business. Fortunately for those farms, the administrative law judge ruled that the petition, which sought to eliminate California’s milk quota system was “not legally valid” and recommends that Secretary of Food and Agriculture Karen Ross deny the petition in its entirety.

The petition sought to terminate the 50-year-old California milk quota system—a huge asset for the California dairy industry that is worth hundreds of millions of dollars and owned by most of the state’s dairy farms, especially smaller family-run farms. The decision is a huge win for California dairy farms that have invested their revenue to purchase quota, and whose survival hung in the balance. As dozens of farmers testified at the hearing in June, terminating quota would have robbed them of their and their families’ decades of hard work seized one of their most valuable assets without paying them any compensation, forced them out of business, resulted in huge lay-offs, and thrown the state’s dairy industry into financial chaos. Examples of the testimony are:

Terminating quota would be “financially catastrophic” and is a “matter of life or death for our dairy.” – Maia Cipponeri, fourth-generation dairy farmer from Merced County

“If quota were suddenly terminated, I would be immediately plunged into severe debt that I could not pay . . . . In addition to financial ruin, this would ruin my son’s dream of continuing the family of California dairymen.” – Frank Borges, a third-generation dairy farmer from San Joaquin County

A group of farmers who successfully opposed the petition throughout these proceedings were represented by the law firm of Cotchett, Pitre, and McCarthy, LLP.

“This ruling ends a cynical back door attempt to illegally take assets from dairy farmers.” – Niall McCarthy, Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, LLP

About Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, LLP

Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy engages exclusively in litigation and trials and has earned a national reputation for its dedication to prosecuting or defending socially just actions. To learn more about the firm, visit www.cpmlegal.com

Contacts

Niall McCarthy
Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, LLP
(650) 697-6000 – Office
(650) 245-8035 – Cell
nmccarthy@cpmlegal.com

Lee Houskeeper – Media contact
(415) 777-4700 – Office
(415) 654-9141 – Cell
newsservice@aol.com

Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, LLP


Release Versions

Contacts

Niall McCarthy
Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, LLP
(650) 697-6000 – Office
(650) 245-8035 – Cell
nmccarthy@cpmlegal.com

Lee Houskeeper – Media contact
(415) 777-4700 – Office
(415) 654-9141 – Cell
newsservice@aol.com

More News From Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, LLP

Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy Announces Opening of $250 Million Apple AI False Advertising Settlement Claims Period

SAN JOSE, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy announced today the beginning of the 90-day Notice Period during which Class Members can submit their claims in this landmark settlement. On July 17, 2026, Judge Noël Wise of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California granted preliminary approval of this $250,000,000 Settlement with Apple in this nationwide false advertising class action concerning “Apple Intelligence” on iPhones. Plaintiffs allege that Apple...

Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy Files Lawsuit Against Logitech Over Tariff Refunds Which the Company Has Not Returned to Customers

SAN JOSE, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--On August 18, 2026, Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, LLP (“CPM”) filed a class action lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose Division, against Logitech Inc. (“Logitech”), on behalf of a proposed nationwide class of consumers who purchased Logitech products at prices the company quietly inflated to cover the costs of tariffs, now reimbursed by the federal government. The complaint alleges that Logitech raised U.S. re...

Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy Announces Bank of America Must Face Trial in California Pandemic Unemployment Benefits Litigation

SAN DIEGO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy announces today, August 18, 2026, that Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel of the U.S. District Court in San Diego issued a 105-page order denying Bank of America’s motion for summary judgment in this long-running Multi-District Litigation class action. The lawsuit seeks to hold the Bank accountable for violating state and federal laws for more than 100,000 Californians who received unemployment and disability benefits through Bank-issued prepaid d...
Back to Newsroom