-

Major Victory for California Dairy Civil War

SACRAMENTO, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--A decisive victory for small family dairy farms was won this week in what has been called a civil war in the California dairy industry. In a proceeding before The California Department of Food and Agriculture, Administrative Law Judge Timothy J. Aspinwall issued a much-awaited decision on a petition that could have put hundreds of California family dairy farms out of business. Fortunately for those farms, the administrative law judge ruled that the petition, which sought to eliminate California’s milk quota system was “not legally valid” and recommends that Secretary of Food and Agriculture Karen Ross deny the petition in its entirety.

The petition sought to terminate the 50-year-old California milk quota system—a huge asset for the California dairy industry that is worth hundreds of millions of dollars and owned by most of the state’s dairy farms, especially smaller family-run farms. The decision is a huge win for California dairy farms that have invested their revenue to purchase quota, and whose survival hung in the balance. As dozens of farmers testified at the hearing in June, terminating quota would have robbed them of their and their families’ decades of hard work seized one of their most valuable assets without paying them any compensation, forced them out of business, resulted in huge lay-offs, and thrown the state’s dairy industry into financial chaos. Examples of the testimony are:

Terminating quota would be “financially catastrophic” and is a “matter of life or death for our dairy.” – Maia Cipponeri, fourth-generation dairy farmer from Merced County

“If quota were suddenly terminated, I would be immediately plunged into severe debt that I could not pay . . . . In addition to financial ruin, this would ruin my son’s dream of continuing the family of California dairymen.” – Frank Borges, a third-generation dairy farmer from San Joaquin County

A group of farmers who successfully opposed the petition throughout these proceedings were represented by the law firm of Cotchett, Pitre, and McCarthy, LLP.

“This ruling ends a cynical back door attempt to illegally take assets from dairy farmers.” – Niall McCarthy, Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, LLP

About Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, LLP

Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy engages exclusively in litigation and trials and has earned a national reputation for its dedication to prosecuting or defending socially just actions. To learn more about the firm, visit www.cpmlegal.com

Contacts

Niall McCarthy
Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, LLP
(650) 697-6000 – Office
(650) 245-8035 – Cell
nmccarthy@cpmlegal.com

Lee Houskeeper – Media contact
(415) 777-4700 – Office
(415) 654-9141 – Cell
newsservice@aol.com

Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, LLP


Release Versions

Contacts

Niall McCarthy
Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, LLP
(650) 697-6000 – Office
(650) 245-8035 – Cell
nmccarthy@cpmlegal.com

Lee Houskeeper – Media contact
(415) 777-4700 – Office
(415) 654-9141 – Cell
newsservice@aol.com

More News From Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, LLP

Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy Files First Direct Purchaser Antitrust Class Action Challenging Alleged Global Shipping Container Cartel

BURLINGAME, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy “CPM” has filed the nation's first direct purchaser antitrust class action seeking to hold some of the world's largest shipping container manufacturers accountable for an alleged conspiracy to restrict output and fix prices for standard dry shipping containers sold throughout the United States.On June 24, 2026, Atlantic Coast Container, Inc., represented by CPM, filed a class action complaint in the United States District Court...

Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy Announces Federal Court Grants Final Approval of “Historic” Discrimination Settlement with Wells Fargo

SAN FRANCISCO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy announces today, May 15, 2026, Judge Trina Thompson of the United States District Court in the Northern District of California granted final approval of the historic $110 million settlement reached in In re Wells Fargo & Co. Consolidated Derivative Shareholder Litigation, a seminal derivative lawsuit brought by Wells Fargo shareholders that essentially combined two cases into one, and alleged that the Bank’s Board of Directors b...

Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy Announces a Proposed $250 Million Settlement in Apple AI False Advertising Case

SAN FRANCISCO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, along with co-lead counsel Kaplan Fox and Clarkson, filed a motion today asking the District Court to preliminarily approve a $250,000,000 Settlement with Apple Inc. in a nationwide false advertising class action concerning “Apple Intelligence” on iPhones. Plaintiffs claim that Apple saturated the market with advertising presenting the iPhone 16, and certain models of the iPhone 15, as a breakthrough in artificial intelligence. Acc...
Back to Newsroom