-

Metropolitan Statement on Incidental Take Permit Litigation Filing

LOS ANGELES--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Jeffrey Kightlinger, general manager of the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, issues the following statement on Metropolitan’s filing of a lawsuit yesterday against the state of California regarding the Department of Fish and Wildlife’s Incidental Take Permit for State Water Project operations:

“In filing litigation, Metropolitan acted to protect Southern California’s ratepayers from cost shifts and water supply reductions inappropriately assigned to the State Water Project. While Metropolitan remains committed to working with the state and Governor Newsom to find a comprehensive solution to improve the ecological health of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, that solution must be based on the best available science and not overly burden Southern California. We have made extraordinary progress in the historic voluntary agreement process, including commitments from water users across the state for enhanced flows, which would produce more water for the environment than this state permit, as well as for habitat restoration and funding. The voluntary agreement process continues to be the only productive path for a solution that balances the water supply needs of the environment, our communities and our farms.

“A lengthy legal battle will not produce a sound solution for the Delta ecosystem. We need a state permit that uses the best available science to address the environmental impact of operations and strikes a balance in providing water supply to California’s farms and cities.”

The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California is a state-established cooperative that, along with its 26 cities and retail suppliers, provide water for 19 million people in six counties. The district imports water from the Colorado River and Northern California to supplement local supplies, and helps its members to develop increased water conservation, recycling, storage and other resource-management programs.

Contacts

Rebecca Kimitch, (213) 217-6450; (202) 821-5253, mobile
Maritza Fairfield, (213) 217-6853; (909) 816-7722, mobile

Metropolitan Water District of Southern California


Release Versions

Contacts

Rebecca Kimitch, (213) 217-6450; (202) 821-5253, mobile
Maritza Fairfield, (213) 217-6853; (909) 816-7722, mobile

More News From Metropolitan Water District of Southern California

Metropolitan Breaks Ground on Project That Will Help Communities Hit Hard in State Droughts

CULVER CITY, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Officials from Los Angeles and Ventura counties celebrated today the start of construction of a $280 million project to bring additional sources of water to Southern California communities hit particularly hard by the state’s last drought. The Sepulveda Feeder Pump Stations Project will allow Metropolitan to reverse flows in its system if needed during severe California droughts, pushing water from the Colorado River and Diamond Valley Lake into communities...

Metropolitan to Break Ground on Project to Bring Additional Water to Southern California Cities Most Vulnerable in State Drought

LOS ANGELES--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Metropolitan Water District of Southern California: WHAT: Metropolitan Water District is breaking ground on a project that will increase water reliability in communities in Los Angeles and Ventura counties that were required to severely curtail their water use during the record-breaking drought in 2020-2022. The Sepulveda Feeder Pump Stations project will push Colorado River water and stored supplies from Diamond Valley Lake – Southern California’s largest reservoi...

Metropolitan Issues Statement on Federal Release of Draft EIS for Colorado River Operations

LOS ANGELES--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Metropolitan Water District General Manager Shivaji Deshmukh issues the following statement regarding the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation’s release today of a Draft Environmental Impact Statement for post-2026 operations of Lake Powell and Lake Mead. “The release of today’s Draft EIS is yet another wake-up call that we need a consensus agreement supported by all water users that rely on the Colorado River. None of the five alternatives analyzed by the Bureau of Reclamat...
Back to Newsroom