CHICAGO & NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Qualcomm's proposed acquisition of NXP Semiconductors marks the latest deal in a wave of industry consolidation that includes increasingly expensive transactions with greater focus on expanding scope rather than economies of scale, according to Fitch Ratings. We believe consolidation in the chip industry will continue through the intermediate term within the context of cheap financing and tepid demand in more mature semiconductor markets.
While the NXP deal is expensive (and the largest ever) at $47 billion, including nearly $8 billion of net debt at NXP, Qualcomm will be able to tax-efficiently use offshore cash to fund a material amount of the all-cash transaction, given NXP's Dutch incorporation. Fitch estimates Qualcomm will use approximately $28 billion of its $31 billion of total available cash at June 26, 2016 (more than $28 billion is located outside the U.S.) of offshore cash as of June 26, 2016 (versus $31 billion of total cash) and $11 billion of new debt, resulting in a Fitch estimated total leverage (total debt to operating EBITDA) of roughly 3.2x at closing. Despite the high price tag, Fitch believes the 4.6x revenue purchase multiples is in line with averages paid in large transactions completed over the last year, which Fitch estimates was roughly 5x revenues.
The Qualcomm deal with NXP is the latest example of chip companies acquiring capabilities within growth markets, particularly automotive and internet of things (IoT), as traditional semiconductor PC and smartphone markets mature. Qualcomm expects the acquisition will increase its addressable market by 40%, driven by increasing semiconductor content per car in automotive markets, exponential growth of connected devices in IoT markets and growing adoption of credit card security technologies.
Avago Technologies' Feb. 2, 2016 acquisition of Broadcom for $37 billion focused on leveraging Broadcom's leading wi-fi technology for the IoT market. Qualcomm's August 2016 $2.4 billion acquisition of CSR plc strengthened Qualcomm's nascent automotive and IoT offerings with significant semiconductor and software capabilities. Intel's December 2015 acquisition of Altera Inc. for $16.7 billion acquisition of Altera diversified Intel away from personal computers by combining Altera's field-programmable gate arrays with Intel's low power processors for IoT applications. Even NXP's December 2015 $12 billion acquisition of Freescale Semiconductor focused on expanding already strong capabilities and share in automotive and IoT markets.
Qualcomm has been in strategic review mode over the past few years amid growth concerns reflecting intensifying competition in the maturing smart phone market from the likes of Intel and a less robust long-term outlook for licensing revenue in China, where most smartphone unit growth is expected. The acquisition of NXP meaningfully diversifies Qualcomm's end market exposure, reducing wireless handset exposure to below 50% of mobile products sales from 61% currently, and provides a top line growth catalyst, as well as earnings growth beyond significant share repurchases.
Fitch believes deal integration may be complicated by NXP's ongoing integration of Freescale, which was structured largely as a merger of equals, and lack of technology overlap, given Qualcomm's system-on-a-chip for mobile devices and telecom equipment focus and NXP's focus on mixed-signal semiconductors and microprocessors and microcontrollers.
Additional information is available on www.fitchratings.com.
The above article originally appeared as a post on the Fitch Wire credit market commentary page. The original article, which may include hyperlinks to companies and current ratings, can be accessed at www.fitchratings.com. All opinions expressed are those of Fitch Ratings.
Copyright © 2016 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch's factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch's ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed.
The information in this report is provided "as is" without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers.
For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001.