Senior Leaders Say Big Data, Misaligned Incentives and Bureaucracy Lead to Bad Decision Making

80% Say Flawed Information Has Been Used to Make Strategic Decisions

NEW YORK--()--Senior leaders are struggling to make the right decisions, with 72% of organizations admitting to at least one strategic initiative failing in the last three years as a result of flaws in their decision making process, according to research out today from the Chartered Institute of Management Accountants (CIMA) and the American Institute of CPAs (AICPA). Information overload, excessive bureaucracy, lack of trust and incentives that aren’t aligned with goals were all cited as contributors to poor decision making in businesses globally.

The Joining the Dots: Decision making for a new era’ report surveyed board-level executives at large organizations from 16 countries and revealed that not only do executives admit to poor decision making, more than three quarters (80%) say flawed information has been used to make strategic decisions, with 42% admitting their organization lost a competitive advantage because they were slow to make decisions.

The top causes of poor decision making identified in the report are:

  • Information overload: 36% say their organization is not coping with information overload, and 32% say big data has actually made things worse, while 37% say it has helped. For those that can gain greater mastery of big data, there is a significant opportunity to gain a competitive advantage. Among high performing organizations, 86% are already assessing the management information they need by focusing on the key value drivers of the business model.
  • Bureaucracy: nearly a third, 29%, say the single biggest barrier to more effective decision making is coordination problems caused by organizational silos and bureaucracy.
  • Trust and collaboration: 43% say their level of trust in fellow executives needed improvement and 57% said more active collaboration was required to improve decision making.
  • Incentive structures: 61% of bosses admit their organization’s incentive structures aren’t encouraging the right sort of decisions for short, medium and long-term value.

Charles Tilley, FCMA, CGMA and Chief Executive of CIMA commented: “Bad decisions make for bad business, so these findings are a cause for great concern. Organizations need to treat decision-making as a business-critical process to be professionalized then continually improved. Above all, leaders need to think in an integrated way. This means having a clear and defined business model and relating all decisions back to it; quickly gathering and analyzing all relevant information from all parts of the business; and focusing on key performance indicators rather than gut instinct or hearsay.”

Barry Melancon, CPA, CGMA and President and CEO at the AICPA said: “We are in the age of big data, and the common wisdom has been that the more, the better. However, our research found that big data is actually making life harder for those charged with decision making in many organizations because they are unable to extract relevant information and turn it into insight. With a deep understanding of the financial and non-financial value drivers of the business, the accounting and finance function plays a critical role in connecting the right information with the right people to achieve a competitive advantage for business.”

The report also included in-depth interviews with C-suite executives from companies such as Diageo, Rothschild and EY to uncover the most effective decision makers, and the traits that characterized them, and propose solutions to the decision making challenges facing organizations globally.

Organizations that reported they were well equipped to make the decisions necessary to performance and bottom line results were found to follow integrated thinking principles similar to those outlined in the Global Management Accounting Principles (GMAPs). The GMAPs were designed to create a principles-based framework to help the public and private sectors join the dots, make better decisions and be able to respond effectively to the risks and opportunities they are presented with.

This report also outlined best practices guidelines for companies seeking to improve their decision-making. These include:

  • Build greater trust between leaders and employees to improve sharing of information
  • Balance financial and non-financial information to capture a broader understanding of key value drivers
  • Share relevant and insightful data so leaders can extract meaning
  • Drive greater collaboration between business units to ensure the right people are involved in the business decisions
  • Establish incentive structures to encourage decision-making that will create value for the short, medium and long term
  • Place greater emphasis on engagement with external stakeholders to ensure sustainability of organizational strategy
  • Share outcomes of previous decisions to allow adjustment of review processes and metrics
  • Create greater transparency to align employees with the organization’s wider strategy

For further information on the CGMA report ‘Joining the Dots: Decision making for a new era’ please visit

About the Chartered Global Management Accountant (CGMA)

Two of the world’s most prestigious accounting bodies, AICPA and CIMA, have formed a joint-venture to establish the Chartered Global Management Accountant (CGMA) designation to elevate the profession of management accounting. The designation recognizes the most talented and committed management accountants with the discipline and skill to drive strong business performance. Currently, more than 150,000 management accountants worldwide hold the CGMA designation.

About the Chartered Institute of Management Accountants (CIMA)

The Chartered Institute of Management Accountants, founded in 1919, is the world’s leading and largest professional body of Management Accountants, with more than 227,000 members and students operating in 179 countries, working at the heart of business. CIMA members and students work in industry, commerce, the public sector and not-for-profit organizations.

About the AICPA

The American Institute of CPAs (AICPA) is the world’s largest member association representing the accounting profession, with more than 412,000 members in 144 countries, and a history of serving the public interest since 1887. AICPA members represent many areas of practice, including business and industry, public practice, government, education and consulting.

The AICPA sets ethical standards for the profession and U.S. auditing standards for private companies, nonprofit organizations, federal, state and local governments. It develops and grades the Uniform CPA Examination, and offers specialty credentials for CPAs who concentrate on personal financial planning; forensic accounting; business valuation; and information management and technology assurance. Through a joint venture with the Chartered Institute of Management Accountants (CIMA), it has established the Chartered Global Management Accountant (CGMA) designation which sets a new standard for global recognition of management accounting.

The AICPA maintains offices in New York, Washington, DC, Durham, NC, and Ewing, NJ.

Media representatives are invited to visit the AICPA Press Center at


Colette Krahenbuhl, 202-434-9212

Release Summary

Some 72% of organizations admit to at least one strategic initiative failing in the last three years as a result of flaws in their decision making process, research from CIMA and the AICPA found


Colette Krahenbuhl, 202-434-9212