Correction: Fitch Rates Cook County Forest Preserve, IL's GO Bonds 'AA'; Outlook Stable

NEW YORK--()--(This is a correction of a release originally issued July 7, 2011. It clarifies that new ratings have been assigned to the district's 2001A&B GO bonds in addition to the affirmation of the outstanding bonds.)

Fitch Ratings assigns an 'AA' rating to the following Cook County Forest Preserve, Illinois' (the district) $19.8 million general obligation (GO) bonds:

--General obligation refunding bonds series 2001A;
--General obligation limited tax refunding bonds series 2001B;

Fitch also affirms the 'AA' rating assigned to approximately $82.1 million of outstanding GO bonds, series 2004.

The Rating Outlook is Stable.

RATING RATIONALE:
--The district's financial profile is strong with robust reserve levels.
--Fitch remains concerned that the district's governing structure leaves it open to potential fiscal pressure from the county.
--The overall debt burden remains moderate with rapid amortization. However, the district continues to underfund its pension liability, in accordance with state statute, leading to a weakening funded ratio which may lead to future financial pressures from pension costs.
--The area economy is broad and diverse, anchored by the city of Chicago.

KEY RATING DRIVERS:
--Continued fiscal strength despite potential outside pressures.
--Separation of the governing board of the district and county.
--Ability to address retiree obligations given the increasing Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liability (UAAL) and severe underfunding of the annual required contribution (ARC).

SECURITY:
The bonds are direct and general obligations of the district secured by its full faith and credit. The district has pledged its ad valorem real property tax revenues without limitation to rate or amount for the purpose of making debt service payments.

CREDIT SUMMARY:
Established in 1914 for the purpose of land conservation, the Forest Preserve of Cook County is coterminous with the county (GO bonds rated 'AA', Stable Outlook by Fitch). The district is a separate entity from the county with independent taxing powers, although governed by the county commissioners. Encompassing 68,000 acres, approximately 11% of the county's land mass, it is authorized to preserve a total of up 75,000 acres of open land.

The district's service area benefits from a broad and diverse economic base, anchored by the city of Chicago (GO bonds rated 'AA-', Stable Outlook by Fitch), a nationally and globally important business center which serves as headquarters to over 30 Fortune 500 corporations. The unemployment rate has decreased significantly to 9% in April 2011 from 11% a year prior, although the reduction has largely been driven by a 1.5% decrease in the labor force over the same period while actual employment growth was modest. Wealth levels are slightly above average.

Financial operations for the district have been consistently positive for the past four years with increasing reserves. Fiscal 2010 ended with a $3.2 million surplus in the corporate fund bringing the unreserved fund balance to $35.3 million, equal to a robust 72% of spending. In addition, the district has substantial reserves in other funds that could be called upon if necessary, including $13.4 million of unreserved fund balance in the working cash fund (which is used by the district to make temporary loans to other district funds), and over 1 times maximum annual debt service in reserved fund balance in the bond and interest fund. The district expects to end fiscal 2011 roughly flat despite having budgeted a $9.5 million use of reserves, which the district attributes to conservative budgeting. Future projections for the district indicate continued structural balance. No use of fund balance is currently planned, although the district may use a portion for one-time capital needs.

Fitch is concerned that the district's governing structure leaves it vulnerable to potential financial pressure from Cook County, especially given the current fiscal stress of the county and the history of the county lending to the district when it was in a constrained environment. While the district has no plans to lend to the county nor has it been asked to, the decision to do so would be made by the shared Board of Commissioners. A separation of the governing board for the two entities has been under consideration by the Illinois Senate since the time of the last rating, but no decision has been made to date. Fitch believes greater autonomy for the district would be a positive credit factor.

The debt burden, which consists mainly of overlapping, is moderate when measured on a per capita basis and as a percentage of market value. Debt service costs accounted for a high 20% of spending for the combined corporate and bond and interest funds for fiscal 2010, which is not uncommon for a district with a limited and capital intensive service nature. Amortization is rapid with over 75% of principal being retired within the next 10 years. The current fiscal 2011-2015 capital improvement plan totals $83.6 million with no plans for additional debt.

The district funds its pension plan in accordance with state statute, which continues to be well under the actuarially determined contribution. This funding formula, coupled with recent investment losses, have led to a decrease in the funded ratio from 92.4% at the end of fiscal 2008 to 72.8% at the end of fiscal 2010, assuming the district's 7.5% investment return rate. Using Fitch's more conservative 7% investment assumption, the funded ratio declines slightly to a below average 69%. Additionally, the ARC has been increasing significantly over the past few years, from $2.7 million in fiscal 2006 to $7.6 million for the past year. While the district's actual $1.3 million contribution accounted for a moderate 2.7% of spending, funding the full ARC would pressure the district's budget, equaling over 15% of actual fiscal 2010 spending in the corporate fund.

Additional information is available at 'www.fitchratings.com'.

In addition to the sources of information identified in Fitch's Tax-Supported Rating Criteria, this action was additionally informed by information from Creditscope and IHS Global Insight.

Applicable Criteria and Related Research:
--'Tax-Supported Rating Criteria', dated Aug. 16, 2010;
--'U.S. Local Government Tax-Supported Rating Criteria', dated Oct. 8, 2010.

For information on Build America Bonds, visit 'www.fitchratings.com/BABs'.

Applicable Criteria and Related Research:
Tax-Supported Rating Criteria
http://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_frame.cfm?rpt_id=548605
U.S. Local Government Tax-Supported Rating Criteria
http://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_frame.cfm?rpt_id=564566

ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: HTTP://FITCHRATINGS.COM/UNDERSTANDINGCREDITRATINGS. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY'S PUBLIC WEBSITE 'WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM'. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH'S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE 'CODE OF CONDUCT' SECTION OF THIS SITE.

Contacts

Fitch, Inc.
One State Street Plaza
New York, NY 10004
Primary Analyst
Rachel Barkley, +1-212-908-0514
Director
or
Secondary Analyst
Karen Wagner, +1-212-908-0230
Director
or
Committee Chairperson
Steve Murray, +1-512-215-3729
Senior Director
or
Media Relations
Cindy Stoller, +1-212-908-0526
cindy.stoller@fitchratings.com

Contacts

Fitch, Inc.
One State Street Plaza
New York, NY 10004
Primary Analyst
Rachel Barkley, +1-212-908-0514
Director
or
Secondary Analyst
Karen Wagner, +1-212-908-0230
Director
or
Committee Chairperson
Steve Murray, +1-512-215-3729
Senior Director
or
Media Relations
Cindy Stoller, +1-212-908-0526
cindy.stoller@fitchratings.com