POLL: AI Strategies Need More Than Speed. Women Leaders Are Defining What Else It Takes

New study from Chief and Harris Poll finds that senior women leaders are driving their companies’ AI strategies and defining what matters most: the human cost of getting it wrong

NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Chief, the most powerful network for senior women leaders, today released new research conducted in partnership with The Harris Poll revealing that women leaders are not just participating in AI strategy, they are defining it. The study challenges the prevailing narrative that women are slower to adopt AI and surfaces something far more important: women leaders are asking the harder question of what’s at stake when organizations move too fast without considering the human costs.

The research finds that 80% of women leaders are active strategic players in their organizations’ AI efforts—and that their approach goes well beyond adoption. And 85% of women leaders surveyed have already taken action in their organizations by establishing AI governance guidelines, creating space for human skill development, and having explicit conversations about what good judgment looks like in the human-agentic workforce.

“Every AI strategy conversation over the past few years has been about speed. And everyone feels that pressure, women leaders included,” said Alison Moore, CEO of Chief. “But the research is telling us something important: the companies that will win aren’t just the ones moving fastest. They’re the ones being most intentional about what they’re building alongside the technology. Judgment. Institutional knowledge. The leadership pipeline. Those things don’t scale automatically, they must be invested in. Women leaders understand that as they’re building the workplace of the future. They’re not slowing down on AI. They’re making sure the humans keeping pace with it don’t get left behind in the process.”

Women Leaders Are Defining the AI Strategy—and Setting the Terms

The research dismantles the idea that women are behind in AI. 80% are active strategic players in their organization’s AI strategy. And 78% have already developed personal criteria for what stays human versus what gets outsourced to AI in their own workflows. That is not skepticism. That is strategy. The distinction women leaders are drawing, between what AI should do and what humans must continue to own, represents a more sophisticated form of AI leadership than the speed-first frame that currently dominates the conversation.

What’s more, women are setting the terms of AI adoption, pressing for accountability for negative consequences of AI. The poll shows a workforce eager to adopt AI, but also cautious about its impacts:

• 68% say their executive leadership prioritizes AI adoption speed over sustainable workforce implementation.
• 87% have witnessed negative outcomes when AI is prioritized without parallel investment in people, including 42% reporting that teams can execute but can no longer think strategically, and 40% seeing signs of institutional knowledge disappearing.
• 69% say entry-level hiring is being cut, eliminating the roles where judgment, creativity, and relational skills are built through experience.
• 75% expect the critical thinking gap to get worse over the next three years.
• 81% agree: “We won’t have capable managers in the future if we don’t invest in developing humans now.”

Faced with these challenges, women are fast becoming the champions for a more humane approach to AI adoption. In the past 12 months, 48% have taken active steps to ensure employees continue developing skills as AI replaces entry-level work, 44% have worked to maintain morale and trust, and 42% have moved to protect team dynamics and culture.

Human Intelligence Is the Differentiator—and Women Are Building for It

The leaders building the most resilient organizations are not the ones automating the most. They are the ones who understand that human capability and AI capability make each other stronger. Women leaders are already building from this premise: 68% use AI primarily to amplify or balance human talent, not substitute for it. And 85% believe organizations that invest in both AI and human development will outperform those focused on AI alone.

When asked which human capabilities AI will never replicate, the answers were telling: understanding unspoken cultural and emotional context, ethical decision-making when values conflict, building trust and relationships, and judgment in ambiguous situations. In the agentic era, those are not soft skills. They are the differentiator. And 86% of women leaders agree they are more valuable as leaders because of their human strengths, not despite them.

The women leaders navigating this era most effectively are also turning to each other. 86% of women leaders say their peer network is a competitive advantage in the AI era. 83% learn more from peer conversations about AI than from any formal training. And 84% say they have made smarter AI-related decisions because of insights from their community. In the human-agentic workforce, the most connected leaders are the most capable ones.

Download the full study titled Beyond Speed: How Women Are Defining the Human Agentic Workforce from Chief and The Harris Poll by visiting: https://chief.com/women-leaders-agentic-ai-study-2026

Methodology
This survey was conducted online within the United States by The Harris Poll on behalf of Chief from February 25 to March 10, 2026, among n=1,768 respondents. The data is not weighted. The sample is comprised of three distinct audiences: senior women leaders (n=1,005), senior men leaders (n=503), and mid-level women leaders (n=260). Senior women leaders are women and non-binary individuals with at least 15 years of corporate and/or non-profit experience, who have had a role at a VP level or higher. Senior men leaders are men with at least 15 years of corporate and/or non-profit experience, who have had a role at a VP level or higher. Mid-level women leaders are women and non-binary Millennials with 8-14 years of corporate and/or non-profit experience, who currently hold a managerial role. Those who are no longer in an executive corporate or non-profit role had to be current business owners, entrepreneurs, founders, fractional workers, or consultants to qualify. The data cited in this release is for the senior women leaders audience.

About Chief
Chief is the most powerful membership community and platform for today’s senior women leaders. In our community, members find the connection, insights, and support they need to catalyze their ambition. Learn more at chief.com.