Fitch Downgrades Och-Ziff Capital Management Group LLC to 'BB+'; Maintains Rating Watch Negative

NEW YORK--()--Fitch Ratings has downgraded the Long-term Issuer Default Ratings (IDRs) of Och-Ziff Capital Management Group LLC and its related entities (collectively, OZM) to 'BB+' from 'BBB-'following the company's release of its 3Q16 earnings and asset flow information yesterday. The ratings remain on Rating Watch Negative. A full list of rating follows at the end of this release.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

IDR AND SENIOR UNSECURED DEBT

The downgrades reflect Fitch's expectation of significantly lower future earnings generation capacity following the announced management fee concessions that OZM has agreed to beginning in the fourth quarter of 2016. The decline in the average fee rate to 1.01% from 1.23% in 3Q16 will adversely impact earnings and push financial metrics beyond levels commensurate with an investment grade rating. OZM noted that it has begun to pursue expense reductions, in terms of both compensation and non-compensation expenses, that may counter the revenue declines to some extent. However, the degree of expense offset is uncertain at this time, aside from OZM's indication that in 2017 base salaries and benefits will range between $95 million and $105 million and non-compensation expenses, including interest expense, will range between $151 million and $166 million.

The maintenance of the Negative Watch continues to reflect the heightened probability of potential further negative rating action in the near term if AUM outflows accelerate following the announcement of OZM's settlement with the Department of Justice and Securities and Exchange Commission regarding violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) on Sept. 29, 2016.

While OZM's parent company avoided a guilty plea as part of the FCPA settlement, Fitch believes that the guilty plea by its subsidiary, OZ Africa Management GP LLC, and the administrative settlements agreed to by CEO Daniel Och and CFO Joel Frank could potentially contribute to reputational damage for the overall firm and result in near-term assets under management (AUM) outflows. OZM's 3Q16 asset flows did not indicate material asset outflows thus far, although given the redemption terms of OZM's funds, Fitch expects it to be at least several more months until the full extent of investors' reaction to the FCPA settlement can be fully assessed.

Ratings remain supported by the company's long-term performance track record, particularly in its core multi-strategy hedge fund business; acceptable long-run leverage and interest coverage metrics; acceptable core profitability; and a seasoned management team.

Fitch also views the $400 million partner capital contribution in the form of preferred securities and the expected paydown of the revolving credit facility as important mitigants. Per Fitch's 'Criteria for Rating Non-Financial Corporates', dated Sept. 27, 2016, the partner capital contribution is treated as a shareholder loan. This reflects the strong alignment of interests between the preferred unitholders and common shareholders given significant cross ownership and the limited likelihood that preferred unitholders would exercise the available contractual rights and remedies to the detriment of common shareholders or the institution more broadly. As such, Fitch does not treat the preferred securities as debt obligations of OZM.

Key rating constraints beyond those articulated in the context of the rating downgrade and Negative Watch include the elevated level of market risk due to the meaningful amount of net asset value-based management fees; key man risk associated with the firm's founder and CEO, Daniel Och; and less diversified, albeit improving, AUM relative to higher-rated alternative investment manager peers. Fitch also notes that reduced investor appetite for hedge funds as an asset class, combined with challenged performance relative to benchmarks, has pressured fund flows and fees for the hedge fund industry as a whole.

OZM has historically demonstrated relatively consistent long-term investment performance, with its multi-strategy platform reporting only three negative years since inception in 1994, while generating an 11.8& net return over this time period. However, OZM has been challenged by lackluster short-term investment performance, with year-to-date (YTD) net returns through Oct. 31, 2016 of 1.7% for the OZ Master Fund. The multi-strategy hedge funds represent more than 50% of OZM's total AUM. As of Nov. 1, 2016, OZM's funds experienced $9.2 billion in AUM net outflows, representing a 20.1% decrease since the end of 2015.

Nevertheless, OZM remains one of the largest hedge fund managers in the world, with significant growth and diversification of its AUM post-crisis. OZM has actively grown its credit and real estate businesses, which have served to partially offset performance declines and outflows in the multi-strategy platform. While the newer products tend to generate lower management fees, they provide increased AUM and fee diversity, which is viewed positively by Fitch.

The expansion into credit and real estate has also allowed the company to increase the amount of longer-term committed capital (defined as AUM with initial commitment periods of three years or more) to 41.8% of AUM at 3Q16. Despite the continued increase in longer-term AUM, Fitch believes OZM's profitability remains more susceptible to market risk than more highly-rated alternative investment manager peers, since the majority of OZM's management fees are based on NAV, whereas private equity-oriented alternative investment managers benefit from a greater proportion of fees that are based on committed capital. OZM does not publicly disclose an exact amount of AUM against which fees are assessed on the basis of NAV, but the company's filings indicate that their multi-strategy funds and opportunistic credit funds are 'generally' based on NAV. Together these two represented 73% of AUM at 3Q16.

Core operating performance has weakened over the last year, driven mainly by elevated legal expenses related to the FCPA settlement and a decline in management fees. OZM's management fees decreased to $546.1 million for the trailing-12-months (TTM) ending 3Q16, down from $660.3 million for TTM 3Q15. The average management fee rate for 3Q16 was 1.23% of total AUM, compared to 1.39% at YE2015 and 1.46% at YE2014. The decline had historically been driven primarily by increased AUM from collateralized loan obligations (CLOs) and credit and real estate funds, which generate lower management fees than multi-strategy funds. Going forward, however, fee concessions in response to OZM-specific and industrywide challenges, together with net outflows from the company's multi-strategy funds are expected to be the primary drivers of the lower average fee rate.

In its analysis of OZM, Fitch primarily relies on the company's non-GAAP reporting of economic income. Fitch takes a corporate approach, in which the focus is on debt service coverage and cash flow leverage rather than a balance sheet analysis. Fitch uses fee-related earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (FEBITDA) as a proxy for cash flow in its review of OZM's debt service, which consists of management fees, less compensation expenses (including salary and bonuses equal to 25% of management fees), excluding incentive income, less operating expenses plus depreciation and amortization.

The company's FEBITDA, as calculated by Fitch, declined to $126.9 million for TTM 3Q16, down 45.8% from TTM 3Q15. The Fitch-calculated FEBITDA margin at TTM 3Q16 was 23.2%, which is well-below OZM's historical range of 35% to 45%. The 3Q16 FEBITDA margin was at the low end of Fitch's quantitative earnings benchmark of 20% to 30% for hedge fund managers in the 'BBB' rating category; however, Fitch expects the announced fee concessions to further pressure margins.

OZM's leverage, as calculated by debt/FEBITDA increased to 4.5x for TTM 3Q16 from 2.3x at YE 2015 and 1.9x at TTM 3Q15. Pro forma for the repayment of the $120 million outstanding under the revolver and a normalization of non-compensation expenses, Fitch estimates that leverage would have been 2.9x at TTM 3Q16, consistent with of Fitch's quantitative leverage benchmark of 1.5x to 3.0x for hedge fund managers in the 'BBB' rating category. However, Fitch expects the announced fee concessions to further pressure cash flow leverage.

Fitch-calculated FEBITDA/interest expense was 5.6x at TTM 3Q16, down from 9.3x at YE2015 and 12.2x at TTM 3Q15. Pro forma for the repayment of the revolver and a normalization of non-compensation expenses, Fitch estimates that OZM's interest coverage would have been 7.9x at 3Q16, consistent with Fitch's quantitative coverage benchmark of 6.0x to 12.0x for hedge fund managers in the 'BBB' rating category. However, Fitch expects the announced fee concessions to further pressure interest coverage.

OZM is a publicly traded holding company, and its primary assets are ownership interests in the operating group entities (OZ Management LP, OZ Advisors LP and OZ Advisors II LP), which earn management and incentive fees and are indirectly held through two intermediate holding companies. OZM conducts substantially all of its business through the operating group entities.

Och-Ziff Finance Co. LLC serves as the debt issuing entity for OZM's unsecured debt issuance, and benefits from joint and several guarantees from the management and incentive fee-generating operating group entities. Fitch's analysis of the unsecured debt relies on the joint and several guarantees provided by the operating group entities.

The IDRs assigned to OZ Management LP, OZ Advisors LP, and OZ Advisors II LP are equalized with the ratings assigned to OZM, reflecting the joint and several guarantees among the entities.

The senior unsecured debt is equalized with OZM's IDR reflecting the expectation of average recovery prospects for the instrument.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

IDR AND SENIOR UNSECURED DEBT

Ratings could be downgraded by one or more notches if the settlement and/or investment underperformance result in material AUM outflows over the next three to six months. More specifically, outflows, fee pressure and/or an inability to meaningfully reduce expenses which translate into sustained leverage at or above 4.0x, interest coverage at or below 4.5x or materially reduced liquidity resources would contribute to negative rating action. Ratings may also be downgraded if fundraising capability is materially impaired or Fitch believes the franchise has experienced permanent reputational damage. OZM's ratings also continue to remain sensitive to a key man event with respect to Daniel Och.

Fitch could remove the ratings from Negative Watch and assign a Negative Outlook if the financial impacts, AUM outflows, fundraising capabilities, and/or franchise damage are deemed to be manageable in the context of OZM's financial profile. A stabilization of OZM's investment performance would also contribute to a removal of the Negative Watch and assignment of a Negative Outlook.

Thereafter, a revision of the Rating Outlook to Stable would be conditioned upon OZM's ability to stabilize (or grow) its AUM, demonstrate stronger investment performance and fee generation, normalize its expense base, and return leverage and interest coverage levels on a sustained basis to below 4.0x and above 4.5x, respectively.

The senior unsecured debt rating is equalized with OZM's IDR and, therefore, would be expected to move in tandem with any changes to OZM's IDR. Were OZM to incur material secured debt, this could result in the unsecured debt being rated below OZM's IDR.

Ratings are also sensitive to a change in the ownership of the preferred securities or a material reduction in common stock ownership by the preferred unitholders, either of which would eliminate the current alignment of interests between the investor classes. Under such a scenario, Fitch would treat the full notional amount of the preferred securities as debt, reflecting the cumulative nature of the instrument's dividends and the instrument's change of control provisions, interest rate step-ups and mandatory redemption terms. Such treatment, which would be consistent with Fitch's 'Treatment and Notching of Hybrids in Non-Financial Corporate and REIT Credit Analysis' dated February 2016, would likely have a material adverse impact on OZM's leverage and ratings.

OZM is an alternative investment manager with expanding credit and real estate businesses. The firm had $39 billion of AUM with 548 employees in eight offices worldwide as of Sept. 30, 2016.

Fitch has downgraded the following ratings:

Och-Ziff Capital Management Group LLC

OZ Management LP

OZ Advisors LP

OZ Advisors II LP

--Long-term IDRs to 'BB+' from 'BBB-'.

Och-Ziff Finance Co. LLC

--Long-term IDR to 'BB+' from 'BBB-';

--$400 million senior unsecured debt to 'BB+' from 'BBB-'.

The ratings above remain on Negative Watch.

Additional information is available on www.fitchratings.com.

Applicable Criteria

Criteria for Rating Non-Financial Corporates (pub. 27 Sep 2016)

https://www.fitchratings.com/site/re/885629

Global Non-Bank Financial Institutions Rating Criteria (pub. 15 Jul 2016)

https://www.fitchratings.com/site/re/884128

Additional Disclosures

Dodd-Frank Rating Information Disclosure Form

https://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/press_releases/content/ridf_frame.cfm?pr_id=1014284

Solicitation Status

https://www.fitchratings.com/gws/en/disclosure/solicitation?pr_id=1014284

Endorsement Policy

https://www.fitchratings.com/regulatory

ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: HTTPS://WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM/UNDERSTANDINGCREDITRATINGS. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY'S PUBLIC WEB SITE AT WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA, AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH'S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE, AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE CODE OF CONDUCT SECTION OF THIS SITE. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE.

Copyright © 2016 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch's factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch's ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed.

The information in this report is provided "as is" without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers.

For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty. Ltd. holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001.

Contacts

Fitch Ratings
Primary Analyst:
Nathan Flanders, +1-212-908-0827
Managing Director
Fitch Ratings, Inc.
33 Whitehall Street
New York, NY 10004
or
Secondary Analyst:
Meghan Neenan, CFA, +1-212-908-9121
Senior Director
or
Committee Chairperson:
Sean Pattap, +1-212-908-0642
Senior Director
or
Media Relations:
Hannah James, New York, +1-646-582-4947
hannah.james@fitchratings.com

Contacts

Fitch Ratings
Primary Analyst:
Nathan Flanders, +1-212-908-0827
Managing Director
Fitch Ratings, Inc.
33 Whitehall Street
New York, NY 10004
or
Secondary Analyst:
Meghan Neenan, CFA, +1-212-908-9121
Senior Director
or
Committee Chairperson:
Sean Pattap, +1-212-908-0642
Senior Director
or
Media Relations:
Hannah James, New York, +1-646-582-4947
hannah.james@fitchratings.com