NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Fitch Ratings has upgraded the following Grundy, Kendall and Will Counties Community High School District Number 111 (Minooka), IL ratings:
--Long-Term Issuer Default Rating (IDR) to 'A+' from 'A';
--$8.3 million general obligation (ULTGO) bonds, series 2008 to 'A+' from 'A'.
The Rating Outlook is Stable.
SECURITY
The ULTGO bonds are obligations of the district, payable from its full faith and credit and its unlimited ad valorem tax on all taxable property within the district.
KEY RATING DRIVERS
The upgrade of the IDR reflects implementation of Fitch's revised criteria for U.S. state and local governments, which was released on April 18, 2016. The revised criteria place increased focus on the ability of an entity to manage through economic cycles and the long-term liability burden in relation to personal income. The 'A+' IDR rating incorporates the district's strong gap-closing capacity and ability to manage through economic downturns, moderate long-term liability burden, the limited ability to increase revenues, and adequate expenditure controls.
Economic Resource Base
The district is located 42 miles southwest of Chicago in a rapidly growing area near Interstates 80 and 55 and serves the villages of Minooka, Channahon, and Shorewood, as well as a small portion of the city of Joliet. The district's 2016 enrollment of 2,679 marks a cumulative 5% increase from 2012 levels. Enrollment is further expected to increase by 8% through 2022. The district's 2015 population of 38,000 marks a cumulative 98% increase from 2000 levels, although growth has stabilized over the last five years.
Revenue Framework: 'a' factor assessment
Fitch expects that the district's revenue will grow at the rate of inflation. The district is operating at its maximum operating tax rate which constrains its ability to raise revenue absent growth in the tax base.
Expenditure Framework: 'a' factor assessment
The district's expenditure growth is expected to increase at a rate above natural revenue growth and the district has adequate control over its expenditures.
Long-Term Liability Burden: 'aa' factor assessment
The district's long-term liability burden including net pension liabilities and overall debt is moderate relative to personal income.
Operating Performance: 'aa' factor assessment
The district has strong capacity to manage through an economic downturn with a combination of expenditure control and financial cushion. It has maintained reserves at a high level through the current economic recovery, largely through the issuance of working cash bonds.
RATING SENSITIVITIES
Structurally Balanced Operations: The 'A+' rating assumes that the district achieves structural balance between recurring revenues and expenditures in the medium term.
CREDIT PROFILE
The tax base is concentrated in manufacturing, mitigated somewhat by industry diversification. Median household income exceeds the state and national averages and the poverty rate is low, despite above-average regional unemployment.
Revenue Framework
The district has two main sources of revenue in its operating funds (educational, operations and maintenance, transportation, working cash, and tort funds). Property tax comprised 84% of fiscal 2015 revenue and state aid 15%. The district is not subject to the Property Tax Extension Limitation Law (PTELL) but is subject to tax rate limits. This enables the district to fully leverage growth in the property tax base, but also leaves it susceptible to declines in assessed valuation (AV).
Fitch expects the district's revenue to grow at a rate in line with inflation. The district's property tax base declined significantly from FY 2011 through FY 2015 before increasing by 1% in 2016 and 4.4% for the FY 2017 budget. While the district projects assessed values to grow at approximately 4%, the district would have revenue declines if AV again began to decrease.
The district is currently at the maximum property tax rate in each of its funds, leaving the only route to raise revenue in its capacity to issue $7.8 million in working cash bonds, which Fitch considers to be a non-recurring budgetary strategy. The district only has the ability to issue up to the legal debt limit.
Expenditure Framework
The district's expenditures are largely driven by instruction and support service costs (94% of FY 2015 operating fund revenue). An additional 6% of expenditures comprise debt service costs.
Fitch expects that natural spending growth will be above natural revenue growth. The district is currently in the middle of a one-year contract with its teachers that contained a 3% step increase, which followed a three-year contract that had 6%, 5%, and 4% annual increases. Teachers maintain the ability to strike. Both the district's support and transportation staff chose to unionize in the past year. The district has not started negotiations with support staff, but the transportation staff did strike for seven days and negotiations are currently in mediation. The district's ability to manage future salary increases within a structurally balanced budget will be a credit factor in future rating actions.
The district maintains an adequate degree of expenditure flexibility. While carrying costs were low in FY 2015 at approximately 12% of governmental expenditures, the district has lost some flexibility with the unionization of the district's transportation and support staff. The negotiation of a longer-term contract with the teachers union is also a risk, given the ability of the teachers to strike and the current labor environment with the transportation workers having engaged in a strike within the past year.
Long-Term Liability Burden
The district's long-term liability burden is low, with debt and net pension liabilities at 11% of personal income. No new debt is expected in the medium term, although the district may issue up to $7.8 million in working cash bonds if it cannot achieve structural balance. If this were to occur, the district's liability burden assessment would likely stay in the 'aa' category.
The district participates in the Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund (IMRF), which is an agent multiple employer defined benefit pension system, as well as the Illinois Teachers' Retirement System (TRS), as cost-sharing multiple employer system. The state makes most TRS payments on behalf of the district. The district covers the employees' portion of pension payments. Fitch calculates the ratio of assets to liabilities to be approximately 73.1% assuming a 7% discount rate. The state is responsible for the vast majority of the district's TRS liability, with the district carrying only a small portion of this liability.
Operating Performance
The district has maintained an exceptionally high level of available fund balance throughout the recession and subsequent recovery relative to potential revenue declines depicted by the Fitch Analytical Sensitivity Tool (FAST) in a moderate economic downturn scenario. Fitch expects that available general fund and other operating fund reserves (70% of expenditures in fiscal 2015 and no less than 43% of spending dating back to fiscal 2009) would remain well above the 'aaa' reserve safety margin level, throughout a moderate recessionary period.
While the district has made consistent efforts to maintain a high level of available reserves in the recent economic recovery, it has yet to achieve structural budget balance, increasing reserves by issuing working cash bonds in 2016. While the district states that this is a temporary solution and that it will achieve structural balance through property tax growth, the district is still in the early stages of that plan. Achieving structural balance and maintaining reserve levels will be a factor in maintaining the current rating in future rating actions. The district is expecting a FY 2016 deficit in the operating funds of $1.6 million, which would reduce available reserves to a still strong 66% of general fund expenditures and transfers.
Additional information is available at 'www.fitchratings.com'.
In addition to the sources of information identified in the applicable criteria specified below, this action was informed by information from Lumesis and InvestorTools.
Applicable Criteria
U.S. Tax-Supported Rating Criteria (pub. 18 Apr 2016)
https://www.fitchratings.com/site/re/879478
Additional Disclosures
Dodd-Frank Rating Information Disclosure Form
https://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/press_releases/content/ridf_frame.cfm?pr_id=1012344
Solicitation Status
https://www.fitchratings.com/gws/en/disclosure/solicitation?pr_id=1012344
Endorsement Policy
https://www.fitchratings.com/jsp/creditdesk/PolicyRegulation.faces?context=2&detail=31
ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: HTTPS://WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM/UNDERSTANDINGCREDITRATINGS. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY'S PUBLIC WEB SITE AT WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA, AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH'S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE, AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE CODE OF CONDUCT SECTION OF THIS SITE. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE.
Copyright © 2016 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch's factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch￢ﾀﾙs ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed.
The information in this report is provided "as is" without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers.
For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001