Fitch Affirms Cobb County (GA) GOs at 'AAA'; Outlook Stable

NEW YORK--()--Fitch Ratings has affirmed the following 'AAA' ratings for Cobb County, GA:

--The Long-Term Issuer Default Rating (IDR);

--$6.3 million in outstanding general obligation (GO) bonds;

--$376.6 million in outstanding revenue bonds, series 2015 (Cobb County Coliseum Project) (Federally Taxable) issued by the Cobb-Marietta Coliseum and Exhibit Hall Authority, GA (the authority).

The Outlook is Stable.

SECURITY

The GO and revenue bonds are general obligations of the county, for which its full faith and credit and unlimited taxing power are pledged.

The authority-issued bonds are a limited obligation of the authority, payable from contract payments to be made by the county to the authority under the terms of an intergovernmental agreement. In the agreement the county has agreed to make contract payments equal to debt service on the bonds not less than two business days prior to any debt service payment date, to the extent funds are not otherwise lawfully available for such purpose. The obligation of the county to make payments under the intergovernmental agreement is absolute and unconditional and will not expire so long as any of the bonds remain outstanding and unpaid.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

The maintenance of the 'AAA' IDR and GO rating reflects the county's strong gap-closing capacity, including an unlimited legal ability to independently raise revenues and solid reserves; a low long-term liability burden; and a vibrant and growing economic resource base.

Economic Resource Base

Cobb County is located 20 miles northwest of downtown Atlanta, in the core of the diverse Atlanta metropolitan statistical area (MSA) economy. The county's population of 741,334 in 2015 has grown by 7.7% since 2010, exceeding state and national norms.

Revenue Framework: 'aa' factor assessment

Historical general fund revenues have grown at the pace of inflation despite robust population growth and ongoing development. Revenue-raising ability is strong as property tax rates have no legal limit. Rates are competitive within the Atlanta MSA.

Expenditure Framework: 'aa' factor assessment

Fitch expects expenditures to generally align with or marginally outpace revenue growth trends to meet the needs of the growing population. Fixed carrying costs are moderate and expected to remain stable with the implementation of reforms to retiree benefits and limited debt plans. The county has exceptional flexibility to adjust spending, aided by its ability to control workforce costs in the absence of collective bargaining.

Long-Term Liability Burden: 'aaa' factor assessment

The county's long term liabilities are equal to a low 4% of personal income. Fitch expects liabilities will remain low due to pension reforms and limited debt plans.

Operating Performance: 'aaa' factor assessment

Fitch expects the county will maintain a high level of financial flexibility throughout economic cycles based on its superior budget flexibility, significant reserves, and history of conservative budgeting.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

FINANCIAL FLEXIBILITY: The rating is sensitive to shifts in financial management that would lead to a significant deterioration in the county's financial flexibility and gap-closing ability. The Stable Outlook reflects Fitch's expectation that such shifts are highly unlikely.

CREDIT PROFILE

The county's participation in the Atlanta MSA provides strong growth prospects with its central location and broad transportation access to diverse employment opportunities. IHS, Inc. projects population growth in the Atlanta MSA to average 1.5% annually through 2020 compared to a national rate of 0.8%. County unemployment remained low at 4.7% in June 2016 relative to the state and national average and compared to the recessionary peak of 9.3%. The county continues to exhibit above-average wealth and a low poverty rate, benefitting from favorable employment and population trends and a highly educated workforce. The county is home to five Fortune 500 companies that include The Home Depot, Coca-Cola Enterprises, Genuine Parts (NAPA), NCR and First Data. Home values were adversely impacted by the recession (a 24% decline from 2006 to 2012) although have since rebounded with 40% growth through August 2016 exceeding pre-recession levels, according to Zillow Group. County home values are forecast to expand by an additional 4.3% over the next year.

Revenue Framework

Property tax revenues comprised over 60% of total general fund revenues in fiscal 2015. Property taxes are not due until October 15 in each year, right after the September 30 fiscal year end; as such the county issues tax anticipation notes (TANs) to provide cash for operations for cash flow purposes in the early part of the calendar year.

Cobb County's general fund revenues have grown only in line with inflation, despite steady population and employment growth trends. The county's revenue growth was moderated by the extraordinary reduction in home values and related declines in the tax digest during the recession. Favorably, tax digest growth has shown a strong recovery, with a 4.2% CAGR from fiscal 2013 to fiscal 2015. Tax digest growth has continued through 2016 and has helped to absorb the recessionary losses. Fiscal 2016 represents the fourth consecutive year in which the county has lowered the property tax millage rate (to 9.85 mills) in an effort to 'roll-back' the rate increase enacted in 2011. Fitch expects the county's revenues to continue to grow at similar pace, absent policy action.

The county has broad revenue-raising ability, with no legal limit to the property tax rate and levy. The county's tax rate is competitive with other neighboring counties in the Atlanta MSA.

Expenditure Framework

The county's general fund spending needs are mainly driven by public safety and general government, which together comprised 82% of spending in fiscal 2015.

Fitch expects general fund spending, in the absence of policy action, will generally track or slightly exceed revenue growth over time to meet the service needs of a growing population.

The county's expenditure flexibility is aided by strong control over employee wages, benefits and work rules in the absence of collective bargaining. Carrying costs related to long-term debt and retiree benefits are low at 10%. They will increase with a large 2015 issuance but Fitch expects them to remain moderate.

Long-Term Liability Burden

The county's overall debt and unfunded pension liabilities are equal to 4% of personal income and the burden is expected to remain well below the 10% threshold consistent with a 'aaa' assessment. Nearly one-half of the long-term liability is direct debt, which amortizes at a slow pace (33% in 10 years) but is expected to remain manageable given the county's significant pay-go capital contributions from a one-cent special purpose local option sales tax (SPLOST) levy and limited debt plans. Direct debt levels incorporate the county's $377 million GO issuance in fiscal 2015 to finance a portion of the costs for the new Atlanta Braves baseball stadium, which doubled the county's total debt.

In 2014, county residents voted for its third re-authorization of SPLOST levy to fund its various capital needs from 2016 through 2021. The SPLOST is expected to generate $750 million in revenue through expiration to be shared between the county and its six incorporated municipalities, to be used on a range of countywide projects that include road and park improvements, public safety equipment and buildings and new libraries. Given the six-year term of the SPLOST, Fitch does not expect the county to use the revenues to support debt.

County liabilities associated with retiree benefits should improve over time as it has implemented reforms to pension and retiree health benefits to help stabilize costs. The county provides pension benefits to its employees through a single employer defined benefit plan. The plan's low funded ratio is expected to gradually improve given the closed status of the plan and the county's practice of contributing over the annual required contribution (ARC) on an annual basis. In fiscal 2015, the county's pension funded ratio was 48% with an unfunded actuarial accrued liability of about $601 million, using Fitch's 7% discount rate estimate. The unfunded pension liability is equal to 1.6% of personal income.

Operating Performance

Fitch's scenario analysis highlights the county's strong financial resilience given its low revenue volatility, solid reserves, and super budget flexibility. Fitch expects the county will maintain reserves at a level consistent within a 'aaa' financial resilience assessment in the event of a future economic downturn.

The county demonstrated strong budget management through the recession by implementing furlough days and a hiring freeze, eliminating vacant positions, suspending merit increases and overtime pay and deferring capital spending. The county also raised the millage rate (by 1.5 mills or 15%) in 2011 to offset revenue declines. These actions enabled the county to maintain service levels and avoid layoffs. Fitch expects the county to adopt similar measures in the event of a moderate economic downturn.

The county has consistently increased reserves above the county's 9% policy, with fiscal 2015 results marking the sixth consecutive year of surplus operating results improving the unrestricted fund balance to $96 million or a high 28% of spending. The county also budgets an additional 6% reserve for economic and revenue contingency. The 2016 adopted budget was balanced, with spending 3% higher than in the fiscal 2015 budget reflecting continued growth in the tax digest despite a reduction in the millage rate and a 3% merit pay increase. Preliminary year-end results indicate a possible $4 million net deficit, reflecting the Board's decision to reduce the water fund transfer from the budgeted 10% of water fund revenues to 6%, given the healthy general fund reserve level. County policy allows for up to 10% of water fund revenues to be transferred into the general fund and the county routinely budgets this amount. The county's 2017 proposed budget is balanced and represents a 9% increase over the 2016 adopted budget, due to continued tax digest expansion, increased debt service related to the new-stadium financing, new hires to meet service demands, and a rise in fee revenue due to a combination of increased activity and change in fee structure. The budget also incorporates a 10% transfer from the water fund.

Additional information is available at 'www.fitchratings.com'.

In addition to the sources of information identified in the applicable criteria specified below, this action was informed by information from Lumesis and InvestorTools.

Applicable Criteria

U.S. Tax-Supported Rating Criteria (pub. 18 Apr 2016)

https://www.fitchratings.com/site/re/879478

Additional Disclosures

Dodd-Frank Rating Information Disclosure Form

https://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/press_releases/content/ridf_frame.cfm?pr_id=1012247

Solicitation Status

https://www.fitchratings.com/gws/en/disclosure/solicitation?pr_id=1012247

Endorsement Policy

https://www.fitchratings.com/jsp/creditdesk/PolicyRegulation.faces?context=2&detail=31

ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: HTTPS://WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM/UNDERSTANDINGCREDITRATINGS. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY'S PUBLIC WEB SITE AT WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA, AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH'S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE, AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE CODE OF CONDUCT SECTION OF THIS SITE. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE.

Copyright © 2016 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch's factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch's ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed.

The information in this report is provided "as is" without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers.

For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001

Contacts

Fitch Ratings
Primary Analyst
Grace Wong, +1-212-908-0652
Director
Fitch Ratings, Inc.
33 Whitehall Street
New York, NY 10004
or
Secondary Analyst
Michael Rinaldi, +1-212-908-0833
Senior Director
or
Committee Chairperson
Amy Laskey, +1-212-908-0568
Managing Director
or
Media Relations
Elizabeth Fogerty, New York, +1-212-908-0526
elizabeth.fogerty@fitchratings.com

Contacts

Fitch Ratings
Primary Analyst
Grace Wong, +1-212-908-0652
Director
Fitch Ratings, Inc.
33 Whitehall Street
New York, NY 10004
or
Secondary Analyst
Michael Rinaldi, +1-212-908-0833
Senior Director
or
Committee Chairperson
Amy Laskey, +1-212-908-0568
Managing Director
or
Media Relations
Elizabeth Fogerty, New York, +1-212-908-0526
elizabeth.fogerty@fitchratings.com