NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Fitch Ratings has upgraded Rockingham County, VA's Issuer Default Rating (IDR) to 'AA+' from 'AA'.
The Rating Outlook is Stable.
KEY RATING DRIVERS
The upgrade reflects application of Fitch's revised tax-supported rating criteria for U.S. state and local governments, which was released on April 18. The county's positive credit features include a solid revenue framework, low long-term liability burden, and outstanding gap-closing capacity. The 'AA+' IDR also reflects the county's moderate growth prospects and ample financial flexibility, including sizable reserves and broad budgetary tools.
Economic Resource Base
Located in the heart of the Shenandoah Valley, the county is the third largest in Virginia in land area with 854 square miles and had an estimated 2015 population of 78,593; the population has been stable, growing at a CAGR of less than 1% since 2010.
Revenue Framework: 'aa' factor assessment
Revenues have been climbing at a pace in line with U.S. GDP growth, and moderate growth is anticipated over the near term. The county has the independent legal ability to increase property tax revenues in an unlimited amount.
Expenditure Framework: 'aa' factor assessment
Fitch expects the natural pace of spending growth to generally track revenue growth. Sound expenditure flexibility is due to the county's ability to adjust its labor costs if needed, as well as modest carrying costs.
Long-Term Liability Burden: 'aaa' factor assessment
The county's overall debt and pension liability is low as a percentage of personal income at approximately 4%. Given the county's lack of borrowing plans and fairly rapid amortization rate the overall liability burden should decline over the intermediate term.
Operating Performance: 'aaa' factor assessment
Fitch believes the county's overall financial resilience is more than adequate for a 'aaa' financial resilience assessment, with the county expected to maintain healthy reserves and a high level of budgetary flexibility through a typical economic cycle.
Continued Strong Financial Operations: The rating is sensitive to shifts in fundamental credit characteristics, including the county's strong financial flexibility. The Stable Outlook reflects Fitch's expectation that such shifts are unlikely.
The largest employment sector is manufacturing. The manufacturing base has remained stable and major companies include Cargill (poultry processing), R.R. Donnelly (book printing), Merck (pharmaceuticals) and MillerCoors (brewery). Merck recently announced a $168 million expansion within the county to produce vaccines and MillerCoors announced a $60 million expansion of its brewery within the county. Higher education also has a major presence and adds stability within the area through James Madison University, located just outside the county's boundaries.
Unemployment continues to track below regional, state and national averages.
The county relies on property taxes, which comprised 87% of general fund revenues in fiscal 2016.
The county's general fund revenue growth has trended above the rate of inflation on a compound average annual (CAGR) basis over the 10 years ended in fiscal 2016 at nearly 4%. However, assessed value has increased at a slower pace of 2.5% for the same time period. The difference in the growth rates are adjustments made to the real estate tax rates during this period. Also, the county implemented a food and beverage tax of 4% in 2010 that boosted the revenue total. Revenue growth prospects appear moderately positive over the next several years based on the recently announced economic activity.
There is no legal limit to the property tax rate or levy, providing the county with significant independent revenue raising flexibility.
The county's largest spending areas are education and public safety, which make up about 47% and 23% of general fund spending, respectively.
Fitch expects the natural pace of spending growth to remain generally in line with revenue growth, as projected modest population gains should result in manageable increases in expenditure demands.
Fixed carrying costs associated with debt service, actuarially determined pension payments and other post-employment benefits (OPEB) actual payments consumed a moderate 12% of fiscal 2016 governmental spending. The county has broad discretion over the terms of employee wages and benefits given the absence of collective bargaining. The county's spending flexibility as it relates to education is a function of minimum funding levels prescribed by state standards, which are applicable to all Virginia municipalities; however, the county currently funds 123% of the requirement.
Long-Term Liability Burden
The county's overall liability burden is modest at about 3% of personal income, driven almost entirely by $82 million of direct debt. The county's five-year debt issuance plans totals $70 million for major renovations to school buildings, starting with a planned $26 million borrowing in the fall of 2017. The county is scheduled to repay more than 70% of outstanding principal over the next 10 years. As such, even after the additional debt issuance the overall liability burden should remain low.
County employees participate in the state-administered Virginia Retirement System, an agent multi-employer defined benefit pension plan. The county makes annual payments as determined by the state that equal its annual required contribution. The June 30, 2015, net pension liability of $13 million represented less than 1% of personal income. When the net pension liability of the school board is included, the total overall liability increases significantly to about 7% of personal income.
The county funds its OPEB obligation on a pay-as-you-go basis. As of July 1, 2015, the net OPEB liability totaled $4.9 million or a very low 0.2% of personal income.
Given the county's superior inherent budget flexibility (in the form of control over revenues and spending capacity), Fitch expects the county to maintain a high level of fundamental financial flexibility through a typical economic cycle. Reserves would be expected to remain above the county's 15% target, a level of financial cushion comfortably higher than that required for a 'aaa' financial resilience assessment. The unrestricted general fund balance of $27 million at fiscal 2016 year-end was a healthy 23% of spending.
The county demonstrated its financial resilience and strong budget management through the most recent recession by reducing its workforce through layoffs, reducing capital spending, and freezing positions. Fitch expects the county would make similar operational changes as needed during a future economic downturn.
The county's fiscal 2017 budget increased approximately 6% above the FY 2016 budget and includes a 2 cent tax rate increase and a $4.7 million fund balance appropriation. The major drivers for this increase include a 2% pay increase across all departments, a $1.5 million increase to schools for technology, and $4.3 million for maintenance items. Given the county's history of positive actual results relative to budget, Fitch expects a similar performance for fiscal 2017.
Additional information is available at 'www.fitchratings.com'.
In addition to the sources of information identified in the applicable criteria specified below, this action was informed by information from Lumesis and InvestorTools.
U.S. Tax-Supported Rating Criteria (pub. 18 Apr 2016)
Dodd-Frank Rating Information Disclosure Form
Copyright © 2016 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch’s factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch’s ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed.
The information in this report is provided “as is” without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers.
For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001