NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Fitch Ratings has assigned the following ratings to the preferred shares issued by Nuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund (NAC) in connection with the fund reorganization described below:
--$98,000,000 of VRDP Shares, Series 7, final mandatory redemption on Aug. 3, 2043, rated 'AAA/F1+'. The liquidity provider is Royal Bank of Canada ('AA/F1+');
--$160,000,000 of VRDP Shares, Series 8, final mandatory redemption on Nov. 6, 2026, rated 'AAA/F1'. The liquidity provider is Barclays Bank PLC ('A/F1').
In addition, the long- and short-term ratings of all other preferred shares issued by NAC are affirmed as follows:
--$136,200,000 of VRDP Shares, Series 1, final mandatory redemption on June 1, 2041, at 'AAA/F1'. The liquidity provider is Societe Generale ('A/F1');
--$91,000,000 of VRDP Shares, Series 2, final mandatory redemption on Dec. 1, 2040, at 'AAA/F1'. The liquidity provider is Citibank, N.A. ('A+/F1');
--$49,800,000 of VRDP Shares, Series 3, final mandatory redemption on March 1, 2040, at 'AAA/F1+'. The liquidity provider is the Toronto-Dominion Bank ('AA-/F1+');
--$105,600,000 of VRDP Shares, Series 4, final mandatory redemption on Dec. 1, 2042, at 'AAA/F1+'. The liquidity provider is Royal Bank of Canada ('AA/F1+');
--$158,900,000 of VRDP Shares, Series 5, final mandatory redemption on Aug. 1, 2040, at 'AAA/F1'. The liquidity provider is Citibank, N.A. ('A+/F1');
--$158,100,000 of VRDP Shares, Series 6, final mandatory redemption on Aug. 1, 2040, at 'AAA/F1'. The liquidity provider is Citibank, N.A. ('A+/F1');
--$145,000,000 of VMTP Shares, Series 2019, term redemption on July 1, 2019, at 'AAA'.
The fund is managed by Nuveen Fund Advisors, LLC (NFA) and subadvised by Nuveen Asset Management, LLC (NAM).
KEY RATING DRIVERS
The short-term ratings of the VRDP Shares primarily reflect:
--The credit strength of the VRDP Shares' liquidity providers noted above;
--The terms and conditions of the VRDP Shares purchase agreements.
The 'AAA' long-term ratings of the VRDP and VMTP Shares primarily reflect:
--Sufficient asset coverage provided to the preferred shares as calculated per each fund's over-collateralization (OC) tests;
--The structural protections afforded by mandatory de-leveraging provisions in the event of asset coverage declines;
--The legal and regulatory parameters that govern each fund's operations;
--The short- and long-term ratings also reflect the capabilities of NFA as investment advisor and NAM as subadvisor.
Nuveen Investments, Inc. (Nuveen) announced the closing of a fund reorganization on Nov. 7, 2016 whereby target funds Nuveen California Dividend Advantage Municipal Fund 2 (NVX) and Nuveen California Dividend Advantage Municipal Fund 3 (NZH) were each reorganized into acquiring fund NAC. NAC was renamed Nuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund.
As a result of the reorganization, substantially all the assets and liabilities of the listed target funds have become assets and liabilities of the acquiring fund. The reorganization has been approved, as applicable, by the common and preferred shareholders of the acquiring and target funds.
Upon the closing of the reorganization, holders of the preferred shares of the target fund received, for each preferred share held immediately prior to the reorganization, one preferred share of the same type having substantially the same terms. Fitch now marks the preferred shares of the target funds as Paid in Full.
The acquiring fund is a closed-end management investment company regulated by the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the Act). Prior to the reorganization, the target and acquiring funds invested in municipal securities that are exempt from regular federal tax and California state income tax, and were permitted to invest up to 20% of assets in below investment grade and / or unrated securities.
FUND LEVERAGE AND ASSET COVERAGE
As of Sept. 30, 2016, total assets, including the impact of the reorganization on a pro forma consolidated basis, was about $3.8 billion. Total leverage on a pro forma consolidated basis consisted of approximately $1.1 billion of preferred shares and $253 million of tender option bond obligations (TOBs).
As of Sept. 30, 2016, asset coverage for the total outstanding preferred shares on a post-reorganization pro forma consolidated basis, as calculated in accordance with the Act, was in excess of the Minimum Asset Coverage of 225% required by the governing documents for the applicable preferred shares.
As of Sept. 30, 2016, the effective leverage ratio on a post-reorganization pro forma consolidated basis was 36%. The effective leverage ratio is below the 45% Maximum Effective Leverage Ratio allowed by the applicable governing documents for the VMTP Shares and governing documents and agreements with liquidity providers for the VRDP Shares.
In the event of asset coverage declines, the fund's governing documents require the fund to reduce leverage in order to restore compliance with the applicable asset coverage test.
Minimum Asset Coverage compliance is tested daily for the VMTP Shares and monthly for the VRDP Shares. Compliance with the Effective Leverage Ratio is tested daily for VMTP Shares and VRDP Shares.
For VMTP Shares and VRDP Shares, failure to cure a breach of the Minimum Asset Coverage requirement by the allotted cure date results in mandatory redemption of sufficient preferred shares to restore compliance. To facilitate redemption, the fund will deposit sufficient proceeds with a third-party tender and paying agent. The time allowed for the fund to restore compliance is consistent with Fitch's 40 to 60-business-day criteria guideline.
For VMTP Shares a breach of the Effective Leverage Ratio threshold requires the fund to redeem a sufficient number of preferred shares, and / or reduce the amount of TOBs the fund has outstanding in order to restore compliance. The time allowed for the fund to restore compliance is consistent with Fitch's 40 to 60-business-day criteria guideline.
For VRDP Shares of each series, a breach of the Effective Leverage Ratio is a breach of the fee agreement with the applicable liquidity provider and, at the option of the applicable liquidity provider, may result in mandatory tender of VRDP Shares of the applicable series for remarketing (see the VRDP Purchase Obligation section below for additional details). However, in the event of a breach Fitch expects the fund to redeem a sufficient number of preferred shares or reduce the amount of TOBs outstanding in order to restore compliance. The allotted time to restore compliance to the Effective Leverage Ratio test is consistent with Fitch's 40 to 60-business-day criteria guideline.
VRDP PURCHASE OBLIGATION
The short-term ratings assigned to the VRDP Shares of each series are directly linked to the short-term creditworthiness of the associated liquidity provider. The VRDP Shares are supported by a purchase agreement to ensure full and timely repayment of all tendered VRDP Shares of the applicable series plus any accumulated and unpaid dividends. The purchase agreement is unconditional and irrevocable.
The VRDP purchase agreement requires the liquidity provider to purchase all VRDP Shares of the applicable series tendered for sale that were not successfully remarketed. The liquidity provider must also purchase all outstanding VRDP Shares of the applicable series if the fund has not obtained an alternate purchase agreement prior to the termination of the purchase agreement then in effect if not extended at the scheduled termination date or following the downgrade of the liquidity provider's rating below 'F2' (or equivalent).
The liquidity provider's role under the fee agreement relating to the purchase obligation for each applicable series has a scheduled termination date. Prior to the scheduled termination date, the fee agreement can be extended to a new scheduled termination date, or a new liquidity provider may be selected. Any future changes to the terms of the fee agreement that weaken the structural protections discussed above may have negative rating implications.
Fitch performed various stress tests on NAC to assess the strength of the structural protections available to the preferred shares compared to the rating stresses outlined in Fitch's closed-end fund rating criteria. These tests included determining various 'worst case' scenarios where the fund's leverage and portfolio composition migrated to the outer limits of the fund's post-reorganization operating and investment guidelines.
Asset coverage available to the preferred shares fell below the 'AAA' threshold, and instead passed at the 'AA' rating level only under remote circumstances, such as increasing the fund's leverage to 45% as well as increasing issuer concentration while simultaneously migrating the portfolio to a level of 55% high yield bonds, above the highest allowable under the fund's post-reorganization expanded investment mandate.
Given the highly unlikely nature of the stress scenarios, and the minimal rating impact at the target leverage level, Fitch views the permitted investments, municipal issuer diversification framework, and mandatory deleveraging mechanisms of NAC as consistent with the 'AAA' ratings assigned to the preferred shares.
The investment advisor for NAC is NFA, a subsidiary of Nuveen Investments. NFA is responsible for the fund's overall investment strategies and their implementation. The subadvisor, NAM, is a subsidiary of NFA that oversees the day-to-day operations of the fund. Nuveen Investments and its affiliates had approximately $244.7 billion of assets under management as of Sept. 30, 2016.
The ratings assigned to the preferred shares may be sensitive to material changes in the leverage composition, portfolio credit quality or market risk of NAC, as described above. A material adverse deviation from Fitch guidelines for any key rating driver could cause ratings to be lowered by Fitch.
Certain terms relevant to key VRDP structural protections, including Minimum Asset Coverage and the Effective Leverage Ratio are set forth in the fee agreement relating to the purchase agreement and are renewed on a periodic basis. Any future changes to these terms that weaken the structural protections may have negative rating implications.
The short-term rating assigned to the VRDP Shares of each series may also be sensitive to changes in the financial condition of the liquidity providers. A downgrade of a liquidity provider to 'F2' would result in a downgrade of the short-term ratings of the applicable VRDP Shares to 'F2,' absent other mitigants. A downgrade below 'F2', on the other hand, would not necessarily result in a downgrade of the short-term rating of the applicable VRDP Shares, given the features in the transactions that would result in a mandatory tender of the VRDP Shares for remarketing, or purchase by the liquidity provider in the event of a failed remarketing.
NAC has the ability to assume economic leverage through derivative transactions which may not be captured by the Minimum Asset Coverage test or Effective Leverage Ratio. NAC does not currently engage in speculative derivative activities and does not envision engaging in material amounts of such activity in the future. In fact, such activity is limited by the fund's investment guidelines and could run counter to their investment objectives of achieving tax-exempt income. Material speculative derivative exposure in the future could have potential negative rating implications if it adversely affects asset coverage available to rated preferred shares.
For additional information about Fitch's rating guidelines applicable to debt and preferred stock issued by closed-end funds, please review the criteria referenced below, which can be found at on www.fitchratings.com
The sources of information used to assess this rating were the public domain and Nuveen Fund Advisors.
Opt-in to receive Fitch's forthcoming research on closed-end fund:
Additional information is available at www.fitchratings.com
Rating Closed-End Funds and Market Value Structures (pub. 09 Sep 2016)
Dodd-Frank Rating Information Disclosure Form
Copyright © 2016 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch's factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch's ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed.
The information in this report is provided "as is" without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers.
For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001