AUSTIN, Texas--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Fitch Ratings has upgraded the following Surprise, AZ obligations to 'AA+' from 'AA-':
--$34 million outstanding pledged revenue and revenue refunding obligations, series 2015.
Fitch also upgrades the city of Surprise, AZ Long-Term Issuer Default Rating (IDR) to 'AA+' from 'AA-'.
The Rating Outlook is Stable.
The excise tax revenue obligations are payable from installment payments made by the city to the trustee, secured by a pledge of the city's excise taxes and state shared revenues. Installment payments are not subject to annual appropriation.
KEY RATING DRIVERS
The upgrade of the Long-Term Issuer Default Rating (IDR) rating to 'AA+' reflects the application of Fitch Ratings' revised criteria for U.S. state and local governments released on April 18, 2016. In particular, the criteria highlight the impact of the local economy on the city's revenue growth prospects and its low long-term liability burden. The 'AA+' excise tax and state-shared revenue obligation (ETRO) rating reflects a solid coverage cushion and expectations for strong pledged revenue growth. The ETRO rating is limited by the city's IDR.
Economic Resource Base
Surprise is located in Maricopa County (rated 'AAA'/Outlook Stable), 20 miles northwest of Phoenix. The city's 2015 population of 128,422 has realized a rapid 10% compound annual growth rate (CAGR) over the past 15 years and its median household income exceeds that of the U.S. by 16%. The Surprise stadium is the Spring Training home to Major League Baseball's Texas Rangers and Kansas City Royals.
Revenue Framework: 'aaa' factor assessment
The city 's revenue growth has outpaced that of U.S. GDP over the past 10 years ending in fiscal 2014. Growth prospects remain strong. The city has the independent legal ability to adjust its transaction privilege tax (TPT) rate, providing ample revenue-raising capacity.
Expenditure Framework: 'aa' factor assessment
Surprise's natural pace of spending growth is likely to remain in line with the city's revenue growth. Expenditure flexibility is provided through the city's management of its labor costs. Expectations for moderate carrying costs over the medium term incorporate the city's currently low 9.3% carrying costs, its proposed debt issuances, and a likely increase in pension contributions pursuant to plans under development to fully fund pension liabilities.
Long-Term Liability Burden: 'aaa' factor assessment
The city's long-term liability burden is a low 5% of estimated personal income. Fitch expects the long-term liability burden to remain consistent with a 'aaa' assessment because population and income growth are likely to be aligned with additional debt needs and the city's pension funding should limit growth in net pension liabilities.
Operating Performance: 'aaa' factor assessment
Fitch expects Surprise to demonstrate a high level of financial resilience during a moderate economic downturn based on its revenue raising capacity and expenditure flexibility, supplemented by its current level of healthy reserves.
Strong Financial Flexibility: The 'AA+' IDR is sensitive to the city's ongoing financial flexibility and its ability to affordably manage growth as reflected in structurally balanced operations and a sound financial cushion.
Solid Coverage Cushion: The ETRO rating is sensitive to maintenance of a solid pledged revenue coverage cushion.
The local economy in Surprise has transitioned from an agricultural base to a residential community with retail, construction and service sectors. These have contributed to growth of the city's employment and sales tax base over the past five years. Major employers are represented by education, retail sales, government, grocery sales, and warehouse/distribution.
Surprise is home to an auto mall comprised of six dealerships. The most recent of these, a Honda dealership, opened in 2016. Hyundai and Subaru dealerships are slated to open in 2017. Fiscal 2016 commercial development has included $123 million of capital investment and the permitting of one million square feet of commercial/industrial space. The city reports continuing residential and commercial growth and a notable research and development center underway. Fitch expects the recent completion of transportation improvements to spur additional growth in the city's local economy.
The city's local sales tax or transaction privilege tax (TPT) collections contributed 38% of fiscal 2015 general fund revenues, followed by state shared revenues (31%). Ad valorem property tax revenues contributed 7% to revenues.
Surprise's general fund revenue CAGR of 5.4% for the 10 years ending in fiscal 2014 exceeded economic performance of the U.S. as measured by GDP. Prospects for growth remain strong based on development underway and the city's participation in regional economic growth.
Additional support for its strong revenue framework is derived from the city's independent legal ability to adjust its TPT rate without respect to limit, providing ample revenue-raising capacity. The city's rate is currently 2.2% for most categories, within the state-wide range of .25% to 5.3% and average of 2.1% in 2016.
Public safety accounts for 47% of the city's general fund operating expenditures, a spending level typical of U.S. municipalities.
Fitch expects the city's public safety and other operating expenditures to grow in line with its revenues.
Surprise participates in a meet-and-confer process with police and fire-fighter employees. However, the meet and confer process defers ultimate decision-making authority for work rules and pay to the city. Other workers are not subject to bargaining. The city's carrying costs at 9.3% of fiscal 2015 governmental expenditures do not pressure its operating budget. Fitch expects the city to maintain moderate carrying costs over the medium term based on its debt issuance plans and assuming moderate ongoing growth of its operating budget. The city's 10-year principal amortization rate is rapid at 80% providing an additional measure of flexibility.
Long-Term Liability Burden
The city of Surprise has a low long-term liability burden approximating 5% of estimated personal income. The city's $252 million long-term liability burden consists primarily of debt ($180 million), $146 million of which is overlapping. The city has placed a $63 million general obligation bond question on the November ballot to fund a variety of projects which would be funded with issuances in 2017 and 2020 if the ballot item is successful. Fitch expects the city's long-term liability burden to remain low based on moderate area debt needs (including the city's current GO plans), an expanding economic base and the city's plans to fully fund its net pension liabilities.
The city participates in four multiple employer pension plans, of which two are cost-sharing and two agent plans. The cost sharing plans are the Arizona State Retirement System (ASRS) and the Elected Officials Retirement Plan (EORP). The agent plans are the Public Safety Personnel System (PSPRS) for police and for fire. Under GASB 67 and 68, the city reports a fiscal 2015 ASRS net pension liability (NPL) of $34.2 million (governmental portion), with fiduciary assets covering 69% of total pension liabilities at the plan's 8% investment return assumption (approximately 63% based on a lower 7% investment rate assumption). The NPL for the city's EORP plan is $1.6 million, with fiduciary assets covering 32% of the total pension liabilities of the plan at the plan's 7.85% investment rate assumption (approximately 29% based on a lower 7% investment rate assumption). The NPL for the city's PSPRS police and fire plans are $11 million and $6 million respectively, with fiduciary assets covering 69% of total police plan and 81% of fire plan pension liabilities at the plan's 7.85% investment return assumption (approximately 63% and 75% based on a lower 7% investment rate assumption). The city has reported that they are in the process of developing a plan to fully fund pension liabilities. Additionally, proposed legislation provides modest PSPRS reforms applicable to new hires and eliminates the automatic cost of living adjustments currently in place which Fitch anticipates could, if implemented, improve long-term plan sustainability.
Fitch expects Surprise to maintain a high level of financial flexibility through economic downturns based on its ample revenue raising capacity and solid financial flexibility, supplemented by its ample reserves.
The city's operating deficits and reserve diminishment during fiscal 2010 through 2012 resulted from a sizable $22 million decline in economically sensitive revenues (fiscal 2008 through 2011), pay-go spending, and accounting adjustments to recognize distinctions between general operating, capital and development fee funds. The city's subsequent strong operating performance and reserve replenishment reflects the benefit of revenue growth and willingness to cut costs. Fitch expects the city to maintain reserves above of its two-month of spending policy floor, well above an amount needed for an 'aaa' assessment of financial resilience.
Fitch expects Surprise to maintain sound financial operating and reporting. The rapid deterioration in financial performance noted above seems unlikely to recur based on the city's enhancements to internal controls adopted in fiscal 2012 and 2013. Surprise consistently makes pension contributions at the actuarially determined levels.
Revenue Stream Analytical Conclusion
Pledged revenues include transaction privilege (sales) taxes, state-shared revenues (consisting of state-shared sales taxes and state revenue sharing), charges for services, permits and fees, and fines and forfeitures. Pledged revenues reflect a solid 4.9% CAGR from fiscal 2004 through 2014 and subsequent gains of 4% and 6.7% respectively in fiscal 2015 and 2016. Growth prospects remain strong.
To evaluate the sensitivity of the dedicated revenue stream to cyclical decline, Fitch considers both revenue sensitivity results (using a 1% decline in national GDP scenario) and the largest decline in revenues over the period covered by the revenue sensitivity analysis. Based on the city's 10-year pledged revenue history, Fitch's analytical sensitivity tool (FAST) generates a 4.4% scenario decline in pledged revenues. The largest actual cumulative decline in historical revenues is 27%, from fiscal 2008-2011, reflecting sensitivity of TPT and state shared revenues to the economic downturn.
Assuming issuance up to the 3.0x ABT, well below actual current coverage, senior debt service would still be covered with a 67% drop in revenues, 15x the scenario results and 2.5x the largest actual revenue decline in the review period. However, Fitch does not expect the city to issue to the ABT based on its use of excise tax and shared sales tax revenues for operations. The city plans to issue GO bonds, for additional debt needs, subject to voter approval. Fiscal 2015 pledged revenues of $91.8 million are up for the fourth consecutive year and cover MADs (2019) a high 21.7x. At this level, debt service would be covered with a 95% drop in revenues, 22x the scenario results and 3.5x the largest decline in the review period. This level of resilience is consistent with an 'AAA' rating (noting additionally that the fiscal years 2008 -2011 performance reflected a housing bust that disproportionately affected the Arizona economy to an extent that Fitch believes is less likely to be repeated in the future).
Additional information is available at 'www.fitchratings.com'.
In addition to the sources of information identified in the applicable criteria specified below, this action was informed by information from Lumesis and InvestorTools.
U.S. Tax-Supported Rating Criteria (pub. 18 Apr 2016)
Dodd-Frank Rating Information Disclosure Form
Copyright © 2016 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch's factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch's ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed.
The information in this report is provided "as is" without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers.
For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001.