NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Fitch Ratings has affirmed the following rating for Albemarle County, VA (the county):
---Issuer Default Rating (IDR) at 'AAA'.
Fitch has also upgraded the following rating for the Albemarle County Economic Development Authority (EDA):
--$38.9 million public facility revenue bonds (Albemarle County project), series 2015B to 'AA+' from 'AA'.
In addition, Fitch has affirmed the following Albemarle County EDA ratings:
--$30.2 million public facility revenue bonds (Albemarle County project), series 2013 at 'AA+'.
The Rating Outlook is Stable.
The revenue bonds are limited obligations of the EDA, payable solely from payments to be made by the county to the authority. Payments are subject to annual appropriation by the county board. The series 2013 bonds are additionally backed by assets under a ground lease.
KEY RATING DRIVERS
The upgrade of the public facility revenue bonds series 2015B to 'AA+' reflects the application of Fitch's revised criteria for the U.S. state and local government credits, which was released on April 18, 2016. Along with the series 2013 public facility revenue bonds, which are affirmed at 'AA+', the bonds are rated one notch lower than the IDR and reflect the requirement for annual appropriations in support of lease payments. The series 2015 bonds do not carry any of the additional risk features that Fitch identifies for rating appropriation debt more than one notch below the IDR.
The 'AAA' IDR reflects the county's notable financial flexibility and low debt levels. Strong revenue growth prospects reflect the county's ability to capture tax base increases. The county has managed its expenditure and long-term liability profiles well, as evidenced by moderate carrying costs and a low debt burden. Fitch expects that these factors, coupled with conservative financial management, would enable the county to maintain financial stability and solid reserves in a potential economic downturn.
Economic Resource Base
Albemarle County is located in north central Virginia, approximately 120 miles southwest of Washington D.C. and 75 miles northwest of Richmond. Anchored by the University of Virginia and the U.S. Department of Defense, the county has a well-educated labor force. Economic and labor metrics are strong, including high levels of wealth and consistently low unemployment. The resilient tax base has returned to solid growth levels subsequent to a mild dip attributable to the Great Recession.
Revenue Framework: 'aaa' factor assessment
Fitch expects revenues to continue rising at a pace above both the rates of inflation and U.S. GDP growth. The county enjoys strong revenue flexibility given the independent legal ability to increase property taxes without limitation.
Expenditure Framework: 'aa' factor assessment
Fitch expects the natural pace of spending growth to track revenue growth. Moderate carrying costs and broad flexibility to manage labor-related costs facilitate the county's ability to adjust spending.
Long-Term Liability Burden: 'aaa' factor assessment
Modest intermediate-term bonding requirements, above-average amortization, and a minimal unfunded pension liability will enable the county to maintain its currently low long-term liability burden.
Operating Performance: 'aaa' factor assessment
The county's superior budget flexibility and ample general fund balance position it to comfortably manage through economic downturns without diminishing its overall financial flexibility.
STRONG MANAGEMENT PRACTICES: The IDR is sensitive to shifts in the county's strong financial management practices and maintenance of fundamental financial flexibility. The Stable Outlook indicates that Fitch believes these shifts are unlikely to occur. The lease revenue bond ratings would parallel the IDR.
Academia and the defense industry provide a solid employment base within the county. The University of Virginia, predominantly located within the county, enrolls over 20,000 students. The University Foundation's research park fosters advanced biotechnology, cyber security, and military support, leveraging the sizable defense industry presence that includes the Defense Intelligence Agency, the National Intelligence Center, and private sector contractors such as Northrup Grumman. The health care industry, insurance, manufacturing, and tourism represent other notable employment sectors. Nearby Charlottesville provides additional employment opportunities for the well-educated labor force.
Property taxes have historically comprised nearly two-thirds of county revenues. Intergovernmental revenues and sales taxes, the next two largest sources, together equal slightly more than one-quarter of total revenues.
General fund revenue has demonstrated strong growth over the past decade, above both national GDP and inflation. Fitch expects long-term growth to trend in line with recent performance, given positive housing growth and retail sales trends.
There is no legal limitation on the county's ability to increase its millage or tax levy.
The county's expenditures are primarily composed of public safety and education. These costs comprise slightly above two-thirds of total general fund expenditures. Virginia public schools are largely funded by a mix of state and local aid contributions. The amount of local contributions is determined by the county board, and based on the state-determined performance standards for the school system.
Given the county's history of revenue growth that has exceeded GDP and inflation, positive housing trends over the past several years, coupled with an affordable debt plan, Fitch expects spending growth to be below or more or less aligned with revenues over time.
The county has solid flexibility to adjust major expenditure items. Fixed carrying costs associated with debt service, actuarially determined pension payments and other post-employment benefits (OPEB) actual payments consume approximately 9% of governmental spending, which could increase somewhat in the intermediate term, based upon future issuance.
The county has broad discretion over the terms of employee wages and benefits given the absence of collective bargaining. A state mandate for a minimum funding level for education in theory limits the county's ability to reduce expenditures; however, the county currently funds education at around twice the state's required local expenditure.
Long-Term Liability Burden
Long-term liabilities, consisting primarily of direct debt, place a very low burden on the county, representing about 3% of the personal income base. An upcoming referendum will provide the opportunity for voters to authorize a $35 million bond resolution, part of the county's $190 million fiscal 2017 - 2021 capital improvements program. The county's rapid amortization rate of approximately 41% of principal retirement within five years and 74% of principal retirement within ten years implies that in five years they will retire an amount that exceeds the proposed issuance.
The county participates in the statewide Virginia Retirement System (VRS), an agent multiple-employer defined benefit pension plan. The county's portions of the plan, for county general employees and the school board's non-professional employees, have an asset to liability ratio of around 84%, using a 7% return on investment assumption. The joint net pension liability is minimal at just under $29 million, less than 1% of personal income. The county pays the full contractually required payment, which equals an actuarially determined contribution.
The school board is a component unit of the county and reports a net pension liability for teachers at $135 million, or an additional 2% of personal income, based on a 7% return on net assets.
The county provides limited other post-employment benefits (OPEB) and the outstanding net liability is minimal as a percent of personal income.
Healthy fund balances, low revenue volatility, and a high level of inherent budget flexibility create a strong capacity to maintain solid reserves, even if a moderate economic downturn were to result in revenue stress. Fitch believes the county has the ability to spend a good portion of its reserves in a downturn and still maintain a fund balance above the safety margin expected for its 'aaa' financial resilience assessment.
The county has consistently maintained positive operations, with recent fund balance draw-downs funding capital or other one-time projects. Reserve levels are well above the county's conservative fund balance policy.
The county concluded fiscal 2015 with a $3.2 million operating surplus, equal to 1.4% of spending, resulting in an unrestricted general fund balance equal to an ample 16.6% of expenditures. Total government-wide days cash on hand is weak at 63 days, attributable to the narrow liquidity of the school board. Preliminary fiscal 2016 results indicate positive operations, with both revenues and expenditures favorable to the budget.
The $257.5 million fiscal 2017 general fund budget represented a 3.3% increase from the prior year, incorporating anticipated property tax revenue increases of 3.9%. Sales tax is projected to rise by 5.8%, reflecting a new major retailer in the county. The budget includes a $1.3 million fund balance appropriation, consisting largely of funding for one-time projects.
Additional information is available at 'www.fitchratings.com'.
In addition to the sources of information identified in the applicable criteria specified below, this action was informed by information from Lumesis and InvestorTools.
U.S. Tax-Supported Rating Criteria (pub. 18 Apr 2016)
Dodd-Frank Rating Information Disclosure Form
Copyright © 2016 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch's factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch's ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed.
The information in this report is provided "as is" without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers.
For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001.