NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Fitch Ratings has assigned a 'AAA' rating to the following Columbus, Ohio bonds:
--$145 million unlimited tax general obligation (ULTGO) bonds, series 2016-3;
--$7.76 million limited tax GO (LTGO) bonds, series 2016-4.
Proceeds of the bonds will be used for the purpose of providing funds to advance refund selected maturities of outstanding voted bonds of the city including various purpose unlimited tax bonds series 2012A & series 2013A, as well as various purpose unlimited tax refunding bonds, series 2013-1, and various purpose limited tax bonds, series 2013B.
The Rating Outlook is Stable.
The ULTGO bonds are secured by the city's full faith and credit and its ad valorem tax, without limitation as to rate or amount. The LTGO bonds are secured by the city's full faith and credit and its ad valorem tax, subject to a 10-mill limitation.
KEY RATING DRIVERS
The 'AAA' rating reflects the city's stable economic underpinnings, exceptionally strong gap-closing capacity, excellent institutionalized financial management practices, and manageable liability burden.
Economic Resource Base:
Columbus, the state capital of Ohio, is located in the central part of the state within the boundaries of Franklin County and, to a limited extent, Fairfield and Delaware counties. The city is anchored by a stable and growing economic base that is diverse and primarily comprised of business services, healthcare, education, and government.
Revenue Framework: 'aaa' factor assessment
Income taxes fund about three-quarters of the city's revenues and Fitch expects them to continue to benefit from solid economic growth. The city has significant independent legal flexibility to raise property tax revenues if needed.
Expenditure Framework: 'aa' factor assessment
Growth in expenditure items is expected to generally keep pace with that of revenues. The city has solid flexibility to control expenses; both carrying costs and the terms of labor contracts are manageable.
Long-Term Liability Burden: 'aa' factor assessment
The city's long-term liabilities are a moderate burden on the economic base. Capital improvement plans are sizeable but the debt burden is not expected to rise materially.
Operating Performance: 'aaa' factor assessment
The city has exhibited strong gap-closing ability during times of recessionary decline. Conservative budgeting practices, including the bolstering of rainy-day fund and unrestricted special income tax debt service fund reserves, have provided additional fund balance resources that, in conjunction with strong budget controls, position the city exceptionally well to address economic downturns.
Strong Fiscal Management: Failure to maintain strong fiscal management and budgeting practices that underpin Columbus' solid financial profile could result in a rating downgrade.
As the state capital and home to Ohio State University (OSU), the Columbus economy is resilient. Significant facilities investment by OSU, Nationwide Children's Hospital and IBM Corporation are expected to add to the city's expanding employment base. Population growth and employment metrics are positive. Wealth levels lag slightly behind the state and national averages, but are negatively skewed by OSU's large student population.
The city relies heavily on economically sensitive income tax levies. Property taxes equal only about 5% of general fund revenues.
Historical revenue growth is below U.S. economic performance but above the level of inflation. A growing employment base reinforces Fitch's expectations for future revenue growth. Management expects income tax revenues to show annual gains of at least 3% for 2016 and 2017, due to wage growth and declining unemployment.
Ohio state law limits un-voted income and sales taxes. Property tax levy "inside mills" may be adjusted by the county, without receiving voter approval, up to 10 mills. However, since the city pays for non-enterprise-fund debt service from income tax revenues alone, it has the legal ability to independently raise property tax revenues equal to 100% of ULTGO debt service, or about 8% of general fund expenditures. Although as a policy matter the city is unlikely to need to take this action, the ability to do so provides significant flexibility and supports a strong revenue framework assessment.
The city's largest expenditure is public safety, which comprises about 67% of total expenditures.
The pace of spending growth is likely to be in line with to moderately above expected revenue growth in the absence of policy action.
The city's expenditure controls are solid. Fiscal 2015 carrying costs for debt, pension, and other post-employment benefits (OPEB) are manageable at 20% of government spending, with debt service alone equaling 12.5%. Budgeted expenditures for 2016 are expected to modestly increase despite expenditure savings found through the city's very strong working relationship with local unions. Management has successfully negotiated both manageable salary increases and significant pension liability decreases, by gradually rolling off all previously covered employee contributions. Labor contracts will re-open for negotiation in 2017. Fitch expects that management will maintain favorable negotiating terms.
Long-Term Liability Burden
The city has a moderate long-term liability burden with debt plus Fitch-adjusted unfunded pension liabilities totaling 12% of personal income. The city is going to voters with a bond referendum to approve the aggregate amount of $950 million at the November 2016 election, all of which would be payable from enterprise or income tax revenues. Management expects the referendum to pass, as the city has a strong history of voter approval for bond issuance. Fitch expects the tax-supported debt burden will remain moderate due to the city's historically prudent use of available debt capacity and moderately paced amortization schedule.
Columbus provides pension benefits and OPEB through two state-sponsored defined benefit pension plans, the Ohio Public Employees Retirement System (OPERS) and the Ohio Police and Fire Pension Fund (OP&F). The combined plans reported a funded ratio of 78%, assuming an 8% rate of return, as of Dec. 31, 2015. Using Fitch's more conservative 7% rate of return, the estimated funded ratio is 69%.
The city has exhibited strong gap-closing ability after recessionary pressure and is expected to maintain strong operational management during times of future economic decline. Financial resilience comes from a combination of expenditure cutting and revenue-raising flexibility and the city's maintenance of a strong reserve cushion.
An unaddressed moderate economic decline scenario shows an operating reserve cushion that Fitch judges will remain well above the level consistent with an 'aaa' financial resilience assessment. Moreover, Fitch expects that in the event of such an actual revenue decline, the city would continue to maintain reserves at a significantly higher level through active expenditure management.
During the most recent recession the city income tax revenues underperformed estimates, resulting in a net operating deficit, but financial results quickly rebounded due to a voter-approved income tax increase to 2.5% in fiscal 2010, a 25% increase from the prior year. The impact of this rate change results in a revenue sensitivity metric that somewhat understates the baseline sensitivity of the city's revenues to economic downturns. However, Fitch notes that given the city's superior inherent budget flexibility and high reserves levels it is well positioned to address even much higher levels of revenue decline.
Management has worked to mitigate the risk associated with the heavy reliance on income tax revenue by growing unrestricted reserves. General fund reserves are maintained well above conservative policy guidelines and access to the unrestricted special income tax debt service fund reserves provides an ample financial cushion. Fitch estimates the city's total reserve cushion at about 40% of general fund spending as of fiscal 2015 year-end. In addition, the city exercises conservative institutionalized budgeting practices and has demonstrated a willingness to take responsive policy action during times of economic distress, which lends additional stability though the economic cycle and bolsters the strength of operational performance.
Date of Relevant Rating Committee: Apr. 28, 2016
Additional information is available at 'www.fitchratings.com'.
In addition to the sources of information identified in the applicable criteria specified below, this action was informed by information from Lumesis and InvestorTools.
U.S. Tax-Supported Rating Criteria (pub. 18 Apr 2016)
Copyright © 2016 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch's factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third-party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch's ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed.
The information in this report is provided "as is" without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers.
For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001.