CHICAGO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Fitch Ratings has affirmed the foreign and local currency Issuer Default Ratings (IDRs) of Magnesita Refratarios S.A. (Magnesita) at 'BB' and its National Scale Ratings at 'AA-(bra)'. The Rating Outlook is revised to Stable from Negative. A full list of rating actions follows at the end of this release.
KEY RATING DRIVERS
The Outlook revision to Stable reflects an improvement in Magnesita's leverage. Fitch's base case indicates that the company's net debt to EBITDA ratio will reach 3.4x in 2016, with a decline to around 3.1x in 2017. These ratios compare with 4.8x in 2015. Improved global competitiveness and profitability gains primarily from a weaker currency, lower capex and interest payments are expected to enhance free cash flow generation (FCF). Cash generated by the sale of its talc business (estimated USD45 million, on net basis) should also help to reduce leverage during 2017.
The sluggish steel industry remains a challenge for Magnesita as it tries to grow its client base and operating cash flow. The company will remain reliant upon gains in North America market share and improved penetration of new markets to offset the weak performance of its Brazilian operations. Positively, over the last few years Magnesita has increased its geographic footprint, reducing its exposure to Brazil for approximately 30% of revenues.
The ratings include Fitch's expectation that Magnesita will continue to seek its conservative and proactive financial policy, underpinned by adequate cash holdings and a manageable debt schedule amortization in order to avoid refinancing risks.
Solid Business Profile; Vertical Integration
Magnesita's ratings are supported by its low-cost and vertically integrated business model, long-life mine reserves, and its position as the world's third largest refractory manufacturer in a highly fragmented market. The company's core business is refractory solutions, comprising 87% of BRL3.6 billion in revenues during the last 12-month period (LTM) ended on June 30 2016, followed by its services business line (6%), and its minerals segment (6%). The company has strong long-term relationships with customers throughout the world, including the largest Brazilian steel producers, as well as leading Brazilian and international cement producers.
Increasing Geographical Diversification
Magnesita is highly exposed to the cyclical steel industry, which accounted for 73% of consolidated revenues in June 2016. Over the past several years, the company has reduced its dependence on the Brazilian steel industry to a projected 27% of revenues in 2016 from 36% in 2012. Fitch expects this percentage to fall to a range of 20% to 25% in the medium term. Magnesita's market share for the Brazilian steel market is around 70%, but in other regions with improving steel industry prospects, such as the U.S., it has greater growth potential. Magnesita currently has an estimated U.S. market-share of around 20%.
Despite weak Brazilian steel volumes and negative industry trends, Magnesita has been able to maintain relatively stable EBITDA margins. During the last 12 months, the depreciation of the Brazilian Real (BRL) bolstered the company's profitability and improved Magnesita's competitiveness in the international market. Fitch expects Magnesita's EBITDA to trend around 14%-15% during the next three years, which it is still sound compared to its peers which exhibit average EBITDA margins of around 12%.
Improved Operating Cash Flow
Magnesita's FCF going forward is expected to be benefited from lower capex due to the conclusion of the SAP roll-out, lower interest expenses as result of liability management, and more efficient working capital management. Under Fitch's base case scenario, Magnesita's CFFO, EBITDA and FCF for 2016 are expected to be approximately BRL278 million, BRL546 million and BRL57 million, respectively. These figures compare positively with BRL189 million, BRL462 million of CFFO and EBITDA, respectively and a negative FCF of BRL50 million. Fitch expects the company's capex to trend closer to around BRL220 million in 2016, down from BRL240 million in 2015.
Stronger EBITDA generation, as a result of profitability gains from FX, has been supporting a deleverage trend for Magnesita. As of June 30, 2016, the company's total and net adjusted debt-to-LTM EBITDA ratios were 5.1x and 3.6x, respectively, compared to 7.5x and 5.0x by year-end 2014. Fitch's base case indicates that its net debt to EBITDA ratio will reach 3.4x in 2016, with a decline to around 3.1x in 2017. Per Fitch's 2017 forecast, Magnesita is expected to receive BRL148 million from the sale of its Talc Business.
--Low-digit revenue growth from 2016 onward;
--Softer but still resilient EBITDA margins - EBITDA margin in the 14%-15% range;
--Capex at around BRL220 million in 2016, slightly decline to BRL207 million in 2017 and BRL230milion in the next two years;
--Dividends at 25% from 2017 onwards;
--Cash balance remains sound compared to short-term debt;
--Reserve life replenished annually;
--No large-scale M&A activity.
Positive: Future developments that may, individually or collectively, lead to a positive rating action include:
--An upgrade is unlikely in the medium term due to sluggish perspectives for the global steel industry and Magnesita's still weak operating cash flow basis compared to issuers in the 'BB' rating.
Negative: Future developments that may, individually or collectively, lead to a negative rating action:
--Prolonged downturn in the cyclical steel and cement markets that hampers production volumes globally more than expected;
--Market share erosion in Brazilian market;
--EBITDA margins declining below 14% on a sustained basis;
--Failure to reduce net adjusted leverage below 3.5x;
--Deterioration of adequate liquidity compared to short-term debt, leading to refinancing risk exposure;
--Large debt-funded M&A acquisition that adversely impacts Magnesita's capital structure on a sustained basis.
Magnesita's liquidity is adequate. As of June 30, 2016, the company had BRL2.6 billion of debt, of which BRL536 million is due in the short term, while cash and marketable securities was solid at BRL752 million. The company's cash position is enough to meet all current debt maturities through 2017. Fitch expects it to access the credit market during 2017 in order to refinance maturities coming due in 2018 and 2019. Positively, Magnesita has demonstrated proven access to export credit lines that could also be an alternative source of future funding. The company's inability to carefully avoid refinancing risk within the near term, may pressure its ratings.
FULL LIST OF RATING ACTIONS
Fitch has affirmed the following ratings:
Magnesita Refratarios S.A.
--Foreign currency long-term IDR at 'BB';
--Local currency long-term IDR at 'BB';
--National long-term rating at 'AA-(bra)';
--Local Debentures issuance at 'AA-(bra)'.
Magnesita Finance Ltd.
--Senior unsecured ratings at 'BB'.
The Rating Outlook is revised to Stable from Negative.
Date of Relevant Rating Committee: Oct. 4, 2016
Additional information is available on www.fitchratings.com.
Criteria for Rating Non-Financial Corporates (pub. 27 Sep 2016)
Dodd-Frank Rating Information Disclosure Form
Copyright © 2016 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch's factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch's ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed.
The information in this report is provided "as is" without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers.
For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001.