CHICAGO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Fitch Ratings has downgraded one and affirmed 14 classes in Morgan Stanley Capital I Trust series 2006-HQ10 commercial mortgage pass-through certificates. A detailed list of rating actions follows at the end of this release.
KEY RATING DRIVERS
The affirmations reflect the largely unchanged loss expectations for the pool since Fitch's last rating action. Fitch modelled losses of 33.9% for the remaining pool; expected losses on the original pool balance total 5.8%, including $84.9 million in realized losses to date. At the last review, Fitch modelled losses of 7.3% for the then-remaining pool (5.0% of the original balance).
Since the last rating action, 69 loans repaid from the trust in full, contributing $792.7 million in principal paydown. This has left the deal highly concentrated with only 12 loans or loan groups remaining. Four loans, representing 53.4% of the pool, are currently in special servicing. Adverse selection is also a concern as the deal continues to wind down: there are five performing loans representing 37.6% of the pool balance which are scheduled to mature by YE2016. After these loans repay, the pool will be almost exclusively composed of defaulted assets.
The largest loan in the pool is also the largest loan in special servicing. Representing 36.6% of the pool, the collateral is a portfolio of seven medical office properties located in Colorado (four), Indiana (two) and Arizona (one). The properties were all developed between 1997 and 2002 and total 435,438 square feet (sf). The loan transferred to special servicing in May 2016 due to imminent default after the borrower indicated it would be unable to pay off the loan at maturity, which is scheduled for Oct. 1, 2016. While the borrower continues to pay debt service, a substantial amount of tenant roll is scheduled to occur by the end of the year. As of March 2016, the portfolio occupancy was 84.3% and the YE2015 debt service coverage ratio (DSCR) was reported to be 1.21x.
The second largest loan in the pool is also a multi-property portfolio. The AZ Office/Retail Portfolio represents 27.1% of the pool and comprises two retail properties and one office building located in Scottsdale, Arizona. The individual crossed loans were previously in special servicing for imminent default and were returned to the master servicer in February 2014 without any modification. They are scheduled to mature in October 2016. Based on the March and June 2016 rent rolls, the portfolio occupancy was 90.1% and the YE2015 DSCR was reported to be 1.16x.
Fort Roc Portfolio is the third largest loan in the pool, representing 10.8% of the pool balance, and is in special servicing. The collateral includes seven retail properties totalling 343,769 sf. They are located in Pennsylvania (three), New York (two), Tennessee (one) and Delaware (one). Five of the seven properties are considered single-tenant. Rite-Aid is the sole tenant for four properties, and a fifth property was previously leased exclusively to Staples. The Rite-Aid leases expire in 2018, 2020 and 2026. One of the New York properties was previously leased to Staples through September 2015 and is now completely vacant. This asset accounts for 6.9% of the portfolio net rentable area (NRA) and the Staples departure brings the portfolio occupancy down to 91.3%. The two remaining properties are multi-tenant properties and are anchored by Kmart, which has individual lease expiration dates in February and September 2017. At least one of the two stores has been earmarked by Sears Holding Corp. for closure, which would bring the portfolio occupancy down further to 59.7%.
Classes A-M and A-J maintain Stable Outlooks. Class A-M is expected to be fully repaid by maturing loans in the next remittance. Class A-J will become the most senior bond in the transaction; however, the concentrated nature of the pool and the potential for additional loans to transfer to special servicing limit the possibility for upgrade. While it is viewed as unlikely, classes could be upgraded should the loans in special servicing liquidate at recoveries much higher than Fitch currently anticipates. Distressed classes may be subject to downgrades as losses are realized.
USE OF THIRD-PARTY DUE DILIGENCE PURSUANT TO SEC RULE 17G-10
No third-party due diligence was provided or reviewed in relation to this rating action.
Fitch has downgraded one class as follows:
--$16.8 million class C to 'CCsf' from 'CCCsf', RE 10%.
Fitch has affirmed the following classes as indicated:
--$52.4 million class A-M at 'AAAsf', Outlook Stable;
--$119.3 million class A-J at 'Bsf', Outlook Stable;
--$31.7 million class B at 'CCCsf', RE 100%;
--$22.4 million class D at 'Csf', RE 0%;
--$16.8 million class E at 'Csf', RE 0%;
--$6.4 million class F at 'Dsf', RE 0%;
--$0 class G at 'Dsf', RE0%;
--$0 class H at 'Dsf', RE0%;
--$0 class J at 'Dsf', RE0%;
--$0 class K at 'Dsf', RE0%;
--$0 class L at 'Dsf', RE0%;
--$0 class M at 'Dsf', RE0%;
--$0 class N at 'Dsf', RE0%;
--$0 class O at 'Dsf', RE0%.
The class A-1, A-2, A-3, A-4, A-1A, A-4FL and A-4FX certificates have paid in full. Fitch does not rate the class P certificate. Fitch previously withdrew the ratings on the interest-only class X-1 and X-2 certificates.
Additional information is available at www.fitchratings.com.
Counterparty Criteria for Structured Finance and Covered Bonds (pub. 01
Global Structured Finance Rating Criteria (pub. 27 Jun 2016)
U.S. and Canadian Fixed-Rate Multiborrower CMBS Surveillance and U.S.
Re-REMIC Criteria (pub. 13 Nov 2015)
Dodd-Frank Rating Information Disclosure Form
Copyright © 2016 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch's factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch's ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed.
The information in this report is provided "as is" without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers.
For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001