NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Declines in pricing of Puerto Rico bonds added further pressure to already depressed net asset values (NAVs) of Puerto Rico mutual funds, according to Fitch Ratings. Fitch-rated Puerto Rico fund managers are reacting swiftly by adding to collateral supporting rated notes and deleveraging where needed.
Puerto Rico bond prices fell following the enactment of the Puerto Rico Public Corporation Debt Enforcement and Recovery Act (Recovery Act) on June 26 , which was followed by a series of ratings downgrades impacting government issuers across the commonwealth. The act establishes a restructuring regime for public corporations that may become insolvent.
Fitch Wednesday downgraded Puerto Rico sales tax (Cofina) bonds to 'BB-' from 'AA-' for senior and from 'A+' for subordinate issues, employee retirement system and commonwealth general obligation and guaranteed bonds to 'BB-' from 'BB', and aqueduct and sewer authority (PRASA) bonds to 'B+' from 'BB+'. Previously, Fitch downgraded electric power authority (PREPA) bonds to 'CC' from 'BB' (senior). Fitch does not rate debt issued by the highway and transportation authority (PRHWY). The downgrade of the Cofina, PRASA and PREPA ratings reflected the commonwealth's action to change law to the detriment of bondholders with passage of the Recovery Act. The one-notch rating downgrade of the GO and related bonds was based on marginal deterioration in credit fundamentals despite recent actions designed to support the general credit.
The Recovery Act contemplates two procedures for public corporations to address debt obligations in the event of insolvency. While they are intended to restore solvency over the long term, both procedures entail debt restructuring that would trigger suspension of debt payments and preclude the timely payment of principal and interest during the proceedings. Entities covered by the act include PREPA ($8.6 billion of debt outstanding), PRASA ($4.6 billion) and PRHWY ($5 billion).
The recent events pushed Puerto Rico bond prices to record lows. PREPA bonds with a 5% coupon and 30 year remaining term fell 41% to $34 before rebounding to $39 as of market open July 11th. Similar term PRASA bonds fell 24% to $55 before rebounding to $60, and similar term PRHWY bonds fell 37% to $32 before rebounding to $34. Cofina bond prices gave up 25%, falling to a low of $59 before rebounding to $63, while GO bonds fell a modest 12% to $60 before recovering to $65.
Fitch-rated funds managed by UBS, Banco Popular and Santander (which operate within a $9 billion fund industry on the island) had minimum exposures to uninsured public corporation debt, owning less than $100 million in aggregate, and representing less than 4% of collateral that support Fitch-rated notes, as of mid-June 2014. One reason for the small exposure is that the public corporations issued debt mostly into the US tax designated '103' market, where Puerto Rico funds have abstained from investing due to smaller yields than local bonds.
However, exposures to Cofina and GO bonds in collateral accounts supporting the Fitch-rated notes were more material, averaging 30% and 19%, respectively as of mid-June 2014. The significant price declines put pressure on fund NAVs and increased fund leverage ratios higher, breaching the normal operating maximum of 50% leverage in several cases.
Additionally, Fitch's mark-to-market haircut on Cofina bonds that are pledged to support 'A' rated notes has increased 50% due to the downgrade below investment grade. Funds also rely on repo and margin loan facilities for leverage and generally these have seen raised haircuts and funding costs, although most have not pulled or decreased credit lines. Fund managers are responding with remedial action by topping up collateral and deleveraging the funds where necessary.
Overall, Fitch views the managers' response to these market conditions positively and mirrors actions they undertook in the summer and fall of 2013 when Puerto Rico bond prices tumbled on Fed rate hike and Detroit contagion. We continue to monitor asset coverage available to Fitch-rated notes. Significant breaches and lack of timely cures of minimum asset coverage requirements may cause Fitch to take negative rating actions, although this is not expected at this time.
Additional information is available on www.fitchratings.com.
The above article originally appeared as a post on the Fitch Wire credit market commentary page. The original article, which may include hyperlinks to companies and current ratings, can be accessed at www.fitchratings.com. All opinions expressed are those of Fitch Ratings.