Fitch Rates Canyon ISD, TX's $66MM ULT Bonds 'AAA'/'AA' Underlying; Outlook Stable

AUSTIN, Texas--()--Fitch Ratings has assigned a 'AAA' rating to the following Canyon Independent School District, TX obligations:

--$65.9 million unlimited tax (ULT) school building and refunding bonds, series 2017.

The bonds are scheduled for negotiated sale the week of December 12th. Proceeds will be used for the construction, renovation, acquisition and equipment of school buildings, and to refund a portion of the district's outstanding debt.

The 'AAA' rating on the bonds is based on a guaranty provided by the Texas Permanent School Fund (PSF), whose bond guaranty program is rated 'AAA' by Fitch.

In addition, Fitch has assigned an underlying rating of 'AA' to the bonds, and has affirmed Canyon ISD's Issuer Default Rating (IDR) and its $80 million outstanding ULT debt at 'AA' (pre-refunding).

The Rating Outlook is Stable.

SECURITY

The bonds are payable from an unlimited property tax levy and are further backed by the PSF bond guaranty program. (For more information on the Texas Permanent School Fund see 'Fitch Affirms Texas PSF Rating at 'AAA'; Outlook Stable', dated Aug. 5, 2015).

KEY RATING DRIVERS

The 'AA' rating reflects the district's sound economic underpinnings and strong gap-closing capacity from a combination of solid spending flexibility and reserves. Long-term liabilities and fixed costs may increase as a result of capacity-related debt issuances, but are not expected to exceed moderate levels.

Economic Resource Base

The district is located along the southern border of Amarillo in Randall County, serving a 720-square mile area that is largely rural with roughly 54,000 residents. The city of Amarillo is a regional hub that serves as the banking, distribution, and commercial center for the Texas panhandle.

Revenue Framework: 'a' factor assessment

Revenue growth has been strong, above the national GDP for the 10 years through 2014. Future growth will likely track anticipated enrollment growth given the state funding framework. The district's independent legal ability to raise revenues is limited by state law.

Expenditure Framework: 'aa' factor assessment

The district maintains strong expenditure flexibility in salaries and paygo capital spending. The fixed-cost burden for debt service and retiree benefits is moderately low, and will likely remain an affordable portion of governmental spending. Spending growth is expected to trend in line with revenue growth.

Long-Term Liability Burden: 'aaa' factor assessment

The long-term liability burden is low, reflecting strong state support for retiree benefits. Future capacity-related debt issuance may increase the district's direct debt, although Fitch doesn't expect it to weigh disproportionately on resources.

Operating Performance: 'aaa' factor assessment

The district has a strong history of operating surpluses; reserves are robust and provide ample cushion in the case of an economic downturn, given expenditure flexibility and limited revenue volatility.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Fundamental Shifts: Although not expected, the rating could be sensitive to shifts in the district's spending practices to accommodate enrollment growth.

CREDIT PROFILE

Growth in the tax base has resulted from the area's available land, spurring predominately residential development pushing south from Amarillo. District enrollment totals almost 10,000 students and has grown at an average annual pace of about 2% for the past 10 years. Management reports the possibility of an uptick in enrollment given current trends in residential development.

Revenue Framework

Funding for public schools in Texas is provided by a combination of local (property tax), state and federal resources. The state budgets the majority of instructional activity through the Foundation School Program (FSP), which uses a statutory formula to allocate school aid taking into account each district's property taxes, projected enrollment, and amounts appropriated by the legislature in the biennial budget process. The vast majority of districts are funded using a target revenue approach, whereby the combination of local and state funding for operations meets a predetermined per pupil amount (which varies from district to district).

Local sources are consistently the largest revenue stream, comprising over half of general fund monies; state sources account for about 40%. The compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of district revenues was 4.2% over the 10 years through 2014. Fitch anticipates enrollment growth will continue to drive revenue growth in excess of national GDP.

The district's M&O tax rate of $1.04 per $100 taxable assessed value (TAV) is $0.13 below the legal limit of $1.17. The district would need voter authorization to raise the rate, and there are no current plans to do so. The district levies a separate, unlimited debt service tax rate that stood at $0.22 per $100 TAV as of fiscal 2017, leaving ample margin under the Attorney General's new money limit of $0.50.

Expenditure Framework

The district's main expenditure item is salaries, common for local governments. Adopted budgets typically include some use of operating revenues for capital projects.

The pace of spending growth has fallen in line with revenue growth. This trend is likely to continue barring any changes in district policy or unanticipated growth-related pressure.

The district's fixed cost burden is moderately low, with carrying costs for debt, pensions and other post-employment benefits (OPEB) equaling about 10% of 2015 governmental expenditures. Fitch expects the fixed-cost burden to rise slightly as the district begins to pay debt service on the new money portion of this sale. The district retains flexibility in staffing levels given the modest enrollment growth prospects, and does not have any labor contracts or wage pressure.

Long-Term Liability Burden

The district's total debt and net pension liability is approximately 7% of personal income, with the district's direct debt representing about two-thirds of the total. The district will exhaust its remaining bond authorization with the new money portion of this sale, which will be used for a new intermediate school. The district may seek additional debt authorization depending on the outcome of a strategic plan currently underway.

The district participates in the Texas Teachers Retirement System (TRS), a cost-sharing multiple employer pension system. Under GASB 67 and 68, TRS's assets cover 83.3% of liabilities as of fiscal 2015, a ratio that falls to 75% using a more conservative 7% return assumption. Like all Texas school districts, Canyon ISD is vulnerable to future policy changes that shift more of the contributions and liabilities onto districts, as evidenced by a relatively modest 1.5% of salary contribution requirement that became effective in fiscal 2015. The proportionate share of the system's net pension liability paid by the district is minimal, representing less than 1% of personal income.

Operating Performance

The district has historically maintained healthy reserves and is well-positioned to manage a moderate economic downturn given low revenue volatility and solid expenditure flexibility. Fiscal 2015 general fund reserves stood at a strong $30.7 million (46% of spending), and management projects fiscal 2016 will mark another year of positive operating results due to enrollment growth beyond expectations. The fiscal 2017 budget is largely similar to that of prior years and includes the use of some operating revenues for roof replacements. Management reports enrollment is up over 230 students from the prior year.

The district has demonstrated a strong commitment to supporting financial flexibility, despite recessionary pressures and state funding cuts. Budgeting is conservative and typically includes capital projects, and management has been proactive in maintaining operational balance throughout economic cycles.

Additional information is available at 'www.fitchratings.com'.

In addition to the sources of information identified in the applicable criteria specified below, this action was informed by information from Lumesis, the Municipal Advisory Council of Texas, and InvestorTools.

Applicable Criteria

U.S. Tax-Supported Rating Criteria (pub. 18 Apr 2016)

https://www.fitchratings.com/site/re/879478

Additional Disclosures

Dodd-Frank Rating Information Disclosure Form

https://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/press_releases/content/ridf_frame.cfm?pr_id=1015676

Solicitation Status

https://www.fitchratings.com/gws/en/disclosure/solicitation?pr_id=1015676

Endorsement Policy

https://www.fitchratings.com/regulatory

ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: HTTPS://WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM/UNDERSTANDINGCREDITRATINGS. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY'S PUBLIC WEB SITE AT WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA, AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH'S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE, AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE CODE OF CONDUCT SECTION OF THIS SITE. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE.

Copyright © 2016 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch's factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch's ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed.

The information in this report is provided "as is" without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers.

For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001

Contacts

Fitch Ratings
Primary Analyst
Leslie Cook
Associate Director
+1-512-215-3740
Fitch Ratings, Inc.
111 Congress Avenue
Austin, TX 78701
or
Secondary Analyst
Rebecca Moses
Director
+1-512-215-3739
or
Committee Chairperson
Barbara Ruth Rosenberg
Senior Director
+1-212-908-0731
or
Media Relations
Elizabeth Fogerty, New York, +1-212-908-0526
elizabeth.fogerty@fitchratings.com

Contacts

Fitch Ratings
Primary Analyst
Leslie Cook
Associate Director
+1-512-215-3740
Fitch Ratings, Inc.
111 Congress Avenue
Austin, TX 78701
or
Secondary Analyst
Rebecca Moses
Director
+1-512-215-3739
or
Committee Chairperson
Barbara Ruth Rosenberg
Senior Director
+1-212-908-0731
or
Media Relations
Elizabeth Fogerty, New York, +1-212-908-0526
elizabeth.fogerty@fitchratings.com