NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Fitch Ratings has assigned a 'AA+' rating to the following Annapolis, Maryland (the city) general obligation (GO) bonds:
--$9,500,000 public improvement bonds, 2016 series A;
--$6,755,000 public improvement refunding bonds, 2016 series B.
The bonds are scheduled to sell competitively on December 6. Proceeds of the bonds will be used to finance certain projects of the city and to refund certain outstanding city general obligation bonds for debt service savings.
In addition, Fitch has affirmed the following ratings:
--Approximately $61 million outstanding city GO bonds at 'AA+';
--the city's Issuer Default Rating (IDR) at 'AA+'.
The Rating Outlook is Stable.
The full faith, credit, and taxing power of the city are pledged for the payment of debt service.
KEY RATING DRIVERS
Fitch expects Annapolis to maintain a high level of financial flexibility throughout economic cycles, consistent with a recent history of improved operating performance and sound reserves. The city's strong financial profile reflects positive revenue growth prospects from an improving property tax base, manageable expenditure growth and a demonstrated ability to reduce expenditures during economic downturns. Fitch expects long-term liabilities for debt and pensions to remain moderate based on manageable capital needs despite some anticipated growth in the unfunded pension liability.
Economic Resource Base
Annapolis is the capital of Maryland and is located approximately 25 miles from both Baltimore and Washington, D.C. The city's 2015 population is estimated at 39,474, which is up 3% since 2010.
Revenue Framework: 'aaa' factor assessment
The city derives the bulk of its revenues from property taxes and there is no legal limit on the tax rate or levy. General fund revenues have exceeded both GDP and CPI levels over the ten year period from 2005 - 2015, reflective of tax base growth and periodic increases in tax rates and charges.
Expenditure Framework: 'aa' factor assessment
Fitch expects expenditure growth to be in line with to slightly above natural revenue growth in the absence of policy action. Total carrying costs for debt service, required pension payments and OPEB pay-as-you-go are moderate at 19% of governmental spending. These costs are likely to increase due to less than full funding of the city's pension ARC, but Fitch expects the city's expenditure flexibility to remain solid.
Long-Term Liability Burden: 'aa' factor assessment
The combined burden of long-term debt and unfunded pension liabilities is at the low end of the moderate range as a percentage of personal income. Fitch expects the liability burden to remain moderate even with potential new overlapping debt to be issued by the county over time. The city's direct debt amortization is rapid.
Operating Performance: 'aa' factor assessment
The city's financial resilience has improved notably following the Great Recession. During the period of economic downturn the city drew down reserves and reduced spending. Implementation of financial policies in the recovery has led to positive operating performance the past few years and the city's gap-closing capacity is exceptionally strong.
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE: Fitch expects operating results to remain relatively stable and that the city will maintain a strong level of financial resilience, gradual improvement in reaching full funding of its city administered pension, and improvement in its enterprise fund operations. Results contrary to this expectation could pressure the rating.
The city is the capital of Maryland and the county seat of Anne Arundel County (IDR: 'AA+'/ Stable Outlook). The local economy is anchored by federal, state, and local government employment (approximately 25% of labor force), with added depth from tourism and maritime industries due to the city's location on the Chesapeake Bay. While government centers and the United States Naval Academy generate significant year-round visitation, the marinas and the historic district attract leisure travelers from around the region. Resident wealth levels are above-average and the low unemployment rate is consistently below state and national averages, reflecting the stable employment environment. Market value per capita is high at an estimated $167,000.
The city derives approximately 65% of its revenues from property taxes. The city also receives its share of income taxes from the state and it levies and collects a hotel and motel tax within the city (11% and 7% of projected fiscal 2016 revenues, respectively). Annual increases in property tax revenues have resulted from a combination of tax base growth and the timing of tax rate increases.
The city's general fund revenues have grown faster than the rate of GDP and inflation for the 10-year period 2005 to 2015. Fitch expects future natural revenue growth to moderate but exceed inflation based on recent trends. A modest level of new residential and commercial redevelopment is underway, which will contribute to future tax base growth.
The city is not subject to any legal limitation on its property tax rate or levy.
Assessed value was $6.2 billion for fiscal 2015 and is estimated to increase to $6.6 billion for fiscal 2017, which is close to its peak value in fiscal 2012. Revaluations are performed over a rolling three-year reassessment cycle and if there is an increase it is phased in over three years. If there is a decline, it is reflected in the first year.
The city's largest spending area is public safety, making up about 60% of general fund spending in fiscal 2015, followed by general government and public works.
As with most local governments, Fitch expects spending growth will be near to slightly ahead of natural revenue growth, requiring ongoing budget management.
The city maintains adequate expenditure flexibility. The majority of the city's employees are represented through unions and collective bargaining agreements. The city engaged in an interest-based bargaining process with all of its unions and approved four year contracts which expire June 30, 2017. Moderate salary increases were approved along with changes to pension and health insurance programs to control growth in these future liabilities. Management has the right to make reductions in staff if necessary.
Carrying costs for debt service, actuarially calculated annual required pension contributions, and OPEB spending are moderate at 19% of fiscal 2015 governmental spending. Debt service represented 8% of government spending and should remain stable or decline marginally going forward based on the rapid pace of principal payout (63% of tax supported debt over ten years) and manageable borrowing needs. Pension costs represented 8% of governmental spending but will likely increase moderately as the city has had a practice of under-funding its actuarially required contributions (ARC) for its city-administered police and fire plan.
Long-Term Liability Burden
Long-term liabilities for debt and unfunded pensions represent a moderate 12% of personal income. Fitch expects liability levels to remain moderate given the city's manageable borrowing plans. Fitch anticipates growth in the pension liability due to the practice of underfunding the ARC, although gradual improvement up to the full required amount is anticipated by management over time. City policy restricts annual tax-supported debt service costs to no greater than 12% of the general fund spending (currently 9%) and tax-supported debt not to exceed 3% of taxable assessed value (currently estimated at 1.3%).
The city administers a single-employer defined benefit pension plan for police and fire employees (city plan) and all general employees are part of the state retirement plan (the State Retirement and Pension System of Maryland). The Fitch estimated combined unfunded liability for both plans is around $44 million or a low 0.7% of estimated fiscal 2016 taxable value.
The city plan was overfunded prior to the recession. Investment losses in the downturn lowered the funded ratio to a current Fitch estimated 85%. The city was slow to absorb the larger ARC, and after several years of suspending its pension contributions to the police and fire pension plan, the city contributed 3% of the ARC in fiscal 2012 followed by an increase to 38% of the ARC in fiscal 2014. For fiscal 2015, the city paid 76% of its $3.2 million ARC. The city plans to increase employer and employee contributions gradually until full ARC funding is achieved over time; as such, the unfunded liability is likely to grow, although Fitch expects it to remain low.
The city's unfunded OPEB liability was a low $45.6 million and was 5% funded as of June 30, 2015.
Fitch expects the city will continue to maintain strong financial resilience throughout economic cycles given its superior inherent budget flexibility in the form of revenue and spending control and the limited economic sensitivity of its revenue base, supplemented by high reserves. The city has a demonstrated commitment to restoring reserves to within its policy level of 10% of governmental spending during periods of recovery.
The city has experienced steady growth in revenues largely driven by moderate increases in the property tax rate, intergovernmental revenues and tax base growth. This revenue growth, combined with cost controls as well as partial pension funding deferrals, has helped increase reserves to very high levels.
At fiscal-end 2015, the general fund experienced a net operating surplus after transfers and net of bond proceeds of $1.4 million. Factoring in the $0.8 million underfunding of actuarially required pension contributions, results were slightly lower. The increase in the unrestricted general fund balance to $32.3 million from $14.5 million represents mostly a reclassification of both restricted capital funds and the amounts due to other funds in the general fund in fiscal 2015. The unrestricted general fund balance is a very large 48% of spending.
The city's general fund provides annual operating subsidies to the Transit Fund, operated as an enterprise fund of the city. The general fund subsidies are supported in part from transfers received from the city's parking fund. Transfers to the Transit fund equaled $2.5 million in 2015 (4% of spending) which is down from $3.6 million in 2014. Such amounts are projected by management to continue to decrease as management institutes changes to operations to reduce expenditures.
Three of the city's enterprise funds: Transit Fund, Dock Fund and Market Fund, have historically not been self-supporting and have accumulated operating deficits. Such deficits have resulted in a recording of accumulated amounts due to the general fund for prior subsidies. The amount owed to the general fund totals approximately $10.4 million as of fiscal-end 2015 (15% of spending).
Management took actions to reduce expenditures during the Great Recession but revenue growth was slow to rebound, resulting in a drawdown of reserves, short-term cash flow borrowing and a deferral of pension contributions. Fiscal policy for a budgetary reserve was instituted, property taxes were increased modestly and management was able to restore reserves to robust levels.
Management is projecting a moderate surplus for fiscal 2016 reflecting conservative estimates of intergovernmental revenues and tax collections. The city's fiscal 2017 general fund budget of $71.4 million is up 4% from the prior year's budget and includes conservative revenue estimates and modest increases in departmental and debt service spending. The tax rate was kept flat and the tax base was estimated to increase by 3.7% resulting in new revenue growth.
Additional information is available at 'www.fitchratings.com'.
In addition to the sources of information identified in the applicable criteria specified below, this action was informed by information from Lumesis and InvestorTools.
U.S. Tax-Supported Rating Criteria (pub. 18 Apr 2016)
Dodd-Frank Rating Information Disclosure Form
Copyright (c) 2016 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch's factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch's ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed.
The information in this report is provided "as is" without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers.
For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001.