SAN FRANCISCO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Fitch Ratings has assigned an 'AAA' rating to the following general obligation (GO) bonds to be issued by the Gilroy Unified School District, California:
--$60 million election of 2016, series 2017A.
In addition, Fitch has affirmed the district's Issuer Default Rating (IDR) at 'A+'.
The distinction between the 'AAA' rating on the series 2017A bonds and the 'A+' IDR reflects Fitch's assessment that bondholders are legally insulated from any operating risk of the district.
The Rating Outlook is Stable.
The series 2017A bonds will be sold via negotiation on Jan. 19, 2017. Proceeds will be used to finance specific capital construction, repair, and improvement projects approved by district voters.
The bonds will be repaid from a voter-authorized unlimited ad valorem property tax levied on all taxable property within the district's boundaries.
KEY RATING DRIVERS
SPECIAL REVENUE ANALYSIS: The 'AAA' rating on the series 2017A bonds is based on a dedicated tax analysis without regard to the district's financial operations. Fitch has been provided with legal opinions by district counsel that provide a reasonable basis for concluding that the tax revenue levied to repay the bonds would be considered 'pledged special revenues' in the event of a district bankruptcy.
STRONG ECONOMIC BASE; MODERATE DEBT: The economic resource base supporting the series 2017A bonds is strong and diverse. The unlimited nature of the tax offsets any potential concern about tax base volatility. The district's overall debt is moderate at approximately 4% of the tax base.
IDR REFLECTS UNDERLYING CREDIT: The 'A+' IDR is based on analysis of the district's underlying credit, and incorporates strong gap-closing capacity, moderate historical revenue volatility, and solid expenditure flexibility.
TAX BASE DRIVES GO RATING: The 'AAA' GO bond rating could come under downward pressure in the event of a significant and prolonged decline in the district's tax base and economy, which Fitch is not anticipating.
IDR SENSITIVE TO FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE: The 'A+' IDR could come under downward pressure if the district fails to maintain strong gap-closing capacity, including reserves sufficient to withstand moderate historical revenue volatility commensurate with the current rating level. Continued revenue gains and increased financial resilience supported by reserves maintained throughout the economic cycle could result in upward rating movement.
The 260 square mile district is located in southern Santa Clara County, approximately 30 miles southeast of San Jose, and serves a population of approximately 65,000. The district educates over 11,500 students in kindergarten through 12th grade in 15 schools. Historically, the district was an agricultural and food processing center. However, since it is within commuting distance of Silicon Valley and offers comparatively affordable housing, approximately 69% of its tax base is now residential. Due to housing demand, a number of residential property developments are currently in the permitting and/or construction phases.
After experiencing a 13% decline in fiscal years 2010-2012, taxable assessed value (AV) has more than rebounded by 30% during fiscal years 2013-2017. The district is projecting almost 5% further taxable AV growth in fiscal 2018 due to new construction and existing properties' rising values, and notes that there is stored Proposition 13 value which will be released as longer-held properties are resold. While wealth indicators have tended to be lower than the county and state, they are likely improving as more professional families are attracted to the area because of its comparatively affordable housing.
DEBT SERVICE LEVY VIEWED AS PLEDGED SPECIAL REVENUE
Fitch believes that taxes levied for bond repayment would be considered 'pledged special revenues' under the U.S. bankruptcy code and, therefore, the lien on pledged revenues for the bonds would survive and would not be subject to the automatic stay (i.e. payment interruption) in the event the district were to file for bankruptcy.
Fitch has reviewed and analyzed legal opinions provided by district counsel specific to the series 2017A bonds. Fitch believes they provide a reasonable basis to conclude that these revenues would be treated as pledged special revenues due to certain provisions of the state constitution (primarily Proposition 13), which limit and direct the use of pledged property tax revenues for bond repayment.
As a result, Fitch analyzes the proposed issuance as dedicated tax bonds. This analysis focuses on the district's economy, tax base, and debt burden without regard to financial operations because Fitch believes that bondholders are insulated from any operating risk of the district. Fitch typically analyzes the ratio of available revenues to debt service for dedicated tax bonds, but the unlimited nature of the tax rate pledge on the district's bonds eliminates the need for such calculation.
STRONG TAX BASE SUPPORTS BONDS
The district's diverse tax base and economy (within commuting distance of Silicon Valley) provide a strong basis for repayment of the series 2017A bonds that is unlikely to be reduced by normal or even severe cyclical fluctuations.
The tax base is growing at a healthy pace after experiencing a 13% decline during the last recession. Taxable AV has risen at a 2.7% CAGR since 2007. Prospects for further growth appear solid based on new construction and rising house prices, while taxpayer concentration is low.
Tax rates are low and unlikely to rise to a level that pressures the rating even under relatively severe economic stress. The general tax rate of 1% of AV is established in the state constitution and cannot be increased. Tax override levies for overlapping jurisdictions are similarly low at a combined 0.2% of taxable AV for fiscal 2016.
IDR EXPANDS ANALYSIS TO INCLUDE OPERATIONS
The 'A+' IDR reflects the district's strong gap-closing capacity supported by reserves consistent with an 'a' category level assessment of financial resilience, moderate historical revenue volatility, and solid revenue growth prospects. As with all other California school districts, there is no independent legal ability to raise revenues without voter authorization. This limitation is partially offset by the district's growing student enrollment, solid expenditure flexibility, and moderate long-term liability burden.
Revenue Framework: 'a' factor assessment
The district's revenues have performed well in relation to overall U.S. economic performance and inflation over the past 10 years. The district's independent legal ability to raise revenues is limited by state constitutional provisions requiring voter approval for tax increases.
Expenditure Framework: 'aa' factor assessment
The natural pace of general fund spending is likely to remain in line with, to marginally above, general fund revenues. Fixed debt and retiree benefit costs are moderate relative to the district's resource base, supporting solid expenditure flexibility.
Long-Term Liability Burden: 'aa' factor assessment
Long-term liabilities for overall debt and pensions are moderate relative to the district's resource base.
Operating Performance: 'a' factor assessment
The district has maintained strong gap-closing capacity. Budget management includes multiyear planning under state oversight. Fitch expects implementation of a 7% reserve policy in fiscal 2017 (already achieved a year ahead of schedule, in fiscal 2016) will support the district in maintaining solid unrestricted general fund balance levels throughout the economic cycle in the future.
As with most California school districts, the bulk of the district's operational revenues are derived from a state-determined per pupil funding formula. Future revenue growth under the local control funding formula (LCFF) is determined by overall state revenue performance as well as the district's average daily attendance and unduplicated count of students who are English language learners, eligible for free or subsidized lunch, or in foster care. The district's 58% unduplicated count means that it will continue to benefit from both concentration and supplemental grant funding.
The district's revenues have performed well in relation to overall U.S. economic performance and inflation over the past 10 years. Given projected moderate student enrollment growth and positive trends in state per pupil funding, the district will likely benefit from ongoing solid revenue growth.
As with other California local governments, the district has no independent legal ability to raise revenues due to state constitutional provisions (most notably Propositions 13 and 218) requiring voter approval for tax increases.
Personnel costs for teachers and staff comprise the vast majority of district expenditures. Based on the district's current spending profile, Fitch expects expenditure growth to be in line with, to moderately above, expected revenue growth, in the absence of policy action.
The district's mandate to provide educational services limits its ability to make expenditure reductions in the event of a revenue decline, but Fitch expects expenditure flexibility to remain solid. To address any unanticipated budget gaps, Fitch expects management would likely reduce non-core services and positions, implement furloughs and 0% COLAs, and draw down on the reserves for equipment replacement and a new school. The district has made considerable use of early retirement incentive programs, offering them in each of fiscal years 2010-2014.
The district's multiyear labor contracts facilitate expenditure control, since they typically include contract reopeners for remuneration issues in the second and third years, do not prohibit furloughs or layoffs, and contain no binding arbitration requirements related to remuneration negotiations.
The district's fixed debt and pension carrying costs are moderate at around 15%. The district's pension contributions are rising annually for both pension systems, but should remain in the moderate range.
Long-Term Liability Burden
The district's combined debt and pension liabilities are moderate at around 15% of personal income. The district participates in two state-sponsored pension plans with typical actuarial assumptions. The Fitch-adjusted ratio of pension assets to liabilities is approximately 74%. The district has no other post-employment benefit liability.
In June 2016, approximately 61% of voters authorized $170 million in GO bonds to build a new elementary school and undertake a number of capital repair and improvement projects. The series 2017A bonds are the first issuance against this authorization. Inclusive of the series 2017A bond issuance, the district's direct debt amortization is extremely slow at approximately 18% in 10 years. The district will consider using up the 2016 authorization with further bond issuances of up to $60 million in fiscal 2019 and up to $50 million in fiscal years 2022 or 2023, if AV grows sufficiently (at approximately 5% annually). The district could also issue up to $28 million in new bonds in fiscal 2026 against an earlier unspent voter authorization. Consequently, Fitch expects the district's liability burden to remain moderate for the foreseeable future.
District operations are typically positive, with the recent exception of fiscal 2014 which had a small net operating deficit after transfers (less than 1% of general fund spending) due to the first salary increases in five years. Despite further remuneration increases, the district has subsequently returned to positive operations, largely due to increased funding under LCFF.
The district posted general fund net operating surpluses after transfers in fiscal years 2011-2013 largely due to expenditure reductions. These included implementing furloughs, reducing school days, increasing employee health care contributions, and providing no salary increases for five years. The district restored the furloughed days in fiscal 2013 and, as noted above, began increasing remuneration in fiscal 2014.
In a 1% GDP decline scenario, Fitch estimates the district would experience a moderate general fund revenue decline of less than 3% based on historical results. Given the need to make all budget adjustments on the expenditure side due to the absence of revenue-raising authority, Fitch assesses the district's gap-closing capacity as midrange. Fitch expects that the district, supported by its solid expenditure flexibility, would make the necessary budgetary adjustments to continue to meet its reserve policy.
District budget management is supported by California's robust Assembly Bill 1200 (AB 1200) school oversight framework, which requires conservative budgeting and multiyear forecasting with oversight from the county office of education.
Additional information is available at 'www.fitchratings.com'.
In addition to the sources of information identified in the applicable criteria specified below, this action was informed by information from Lumesis and InvestorTools.
U.S. Tax-Supported Rating Criteria (pub. 18 Apr 2016)
Dodd-Frank Rating Information Disclosure Form
Copyright © 2016 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch's factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third-party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch's ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed.
The information in this report is provided "as is" without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers.
For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty. Ltd. holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001.