NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Both the rating and sector outlooks for the North American Midstream Energy sector are stable amid expectations for stronger commodity prices, improved access to capital markets and lower counterparty risk, according to Fitch Ratings. Balanced growth spending is expected to leave credit quality intact, while liquidity remains sufficient and debt maturities are manageable.
New pipeline projects will continue to come online in 2017, but the size and scale of capital spending is likely to be measured. Issuers may pursue the possibility of joint venturing or project financing large-scale projects. The overall prospects for pipelines should continue to be favorable and improve, given President-elect Donald Trump's support of energy infrastructure. Midstream services will continue to see lackluster processing volumes, while natural gas liquid prices will remain depressed.
Fitch expects fundamentals to remain healthy for natural gas, crude and refined products pipelines. We expect infrastructure and domestic energy development will be key areas of focus for the Trump administration. In particular, Fitch believes a more constructive federal regulatory approach toward pipeline construction will be a benefit for midstream energy issuers, both from an operating and a financial perspective.
Delays and denials in the federal permitting process have introduced regulatory uncertainty surrounding the willingness of the Obama administration to issue federal approvals needed to build energy infrastructure. Rising public protests and state regulatory opposition remain risks.
However, uncertainties around Trump's promised repeal of the North American Free Trade Agreement and how that will affect the importing and exporting of hydrocarbons to and from Canada and Mexico could have negative financial implications for midstream energy names. Further uncertainties around multiple IRS master limited partnership (MLP) tax rules and practices could resolve favorably for MLPs under the new administration.
We believe midstream services may once again be challenged, largely due to processing. Fitch expects processing volumes to remain lackluster as production budget cuts continue to work their way through challenged basins and ethane rejection remains an economic choice for producers. With new ethane cracking capacity scheduled to be in service in late 2017 and into 2018, Fitch expects demand and pricing to improve, but not until the end of 2017, leaving most of the upcoming year challenged.
In addition, we anticipate continued mergers and acquisitions (M&A) in 2017 following an active 2016. Fitch expects to see transactions continue, particularly those financed with equity exchanges, despite the high cost of capital for many issuers. Fitch forecasts M&A activity in the near to intermediate term that focuses on opportunistic asset acquisition by larger midstream issuers and small- to midsized issuers focused on scaling up, particularly as large historical organic growth opportunities moderate. We expect M&A impact on the sector will likely be neutral, provided issuers lean on equity funding to maintain manageable leverage.
Additional information is available on www.fitchratings.com.
The above article originally appeared as a post on the Fitch Wire credit market commentary page. The original article can be accessed at www.fitchratings.com. All opinions expressed are those of Fitch Ratings.
2017 Outlook: North American Midstream Energy (Sector Stabilizing)
Copyright © 2016 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch's factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch's ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed.
The information in this report is provided "as is" without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers.
For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001