SAN FRANCISCO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Fitch Ratings has affirmed the following Mendocino County, CA (the county) ratings:
--$64.15 million pension obligation refunding bonds (POBs) series 2002 at 'A';
--Issuer Default Rating (IDR) at 'A+'.
The Rating Outlook is Stable.
The POBs are an absolute and unconditional obligation of the county imposed by law, the payment of which is not limited to any special source of funds.
KEY RATING DRIVERS
The 'A+' IDR reflects the county's solid spending flexibility and moderate long-term liability burden in the face of a limited revenue framework. The county's reserve levels support adequate financial resilience relative to its somewhat limited budgetary flexibility.
Economic Resource Base
Mendocino County is located in northern California, along the Pacific coast, approximately 115 miles north of San Francisco. The county's estimated population of 90,000 is little changed from the 1990s and is dispersed across 3,500 square miles - a land area larger than several states. The county continues to face challenges associated with a long-term economic contraction. Wealth and income levels remain well below state and national averages. The unemployment rate has historically mirrored that of the state and been above the national average.
Revenue Framework: 'a' factor assessment
Total general fund revenues have performed in line with to slightly above inflation and modestly below U.S. economic growth. The county's legal ability to raise revenues is constrained by state constitutional provisions that require voter approval for tax increases.
Expenditure Framework: 'aa' factor assessment
The pace of spending is expected to be in line with to moderately above revenue growth. Carrying costs, including debt and pension contributions, are moderate.
Long-Term Liability Burden: 'aa' factor assessment
The county's liability burden is moderate relative to its resource base.
Operating Performance: 'a' factor assessment
Reserves have increased over the past few years, relieving some pressure on a moderately constrained expenditure profile. Fitch expects the county to exercise sufficient spending control to maintain satisfactory resilience in the event of a moderate economic downturn.
Maintenance of Reserves: The rating is sensitive to material changes in reserve levels, which along with adequate spending flexibility serve as a buffer to potential revenue contraction.
The county continues to face challenges associated with a long-term economic contraction that dates from the late 1990s. Population growth has been very slow over this period and employment levels dropped steadily before modest growth over the past few years. Tourism and wine production have provided some opportunities for growth, but overall employment and labor force levels have not recovered to pre-recession levels. Wealth and income levels remain well below state and national averages. The unemployment rate has historically mirrored that of the state and been above the national average.
Taxable assessed valuation (TAV) was relatively unaffected by the national housing boom and has been insulated from subsequent declines. TAV dropped by just 2.2% between 2010 and 2013 after many years of steady increases, and resumed modest growth in fiscal 2014.
The county's largest source of revenues is state and federal funding at nearly half of total general fund revenues. Taxes make up about 40% of the revenue total.
Total general fund revenues, with a 10-year CAGR of 2.4% through fiscal 2014, have performed in line with inflation and below U.S. economic growth. Excluding intergovernmental revenues, the general fund recorded a faster rate of revenue growth over this period at 3.3%.
Similar to other California local governments, the county's independent legal ability to raise revenues is limited by state constitutional provisions which require voter approval for tax increases. The county may increase fees and charges for services, but is generally limited to the cost of services provided.
Approximately 42% of spending is for public assistance and 38% is for public safety.
Spending over the near term is expected to be in line with to moderately above revenue growth.
Carrying costs are moderate at about 12% of fiscal 2015 governmental expenditures. The county implemented substantial expenditure reductions during and after the last economic downturn, primarily through workforce and payroll reductions; these cuts limit the county's near-term spending flexibility to a degree. Workforce reductions eliminated approximately one-fourth of the county's full-time employees after the recession, while remaining employees experienced permanent wage cuts of 10% to 12.5%. Most of the most recent two-year labor contracts through fiscal 2017 have 2%-3% annual compensation increases. In addition, the county eliminated other post-employment benefits (OPEB) for current and retired employees.
Voters recently approved two cannabis-related measures. Measure AI authorizes the county to tax cannabis cultivation sites in unincorporated areas of the county at 2.5%, which the Board of Supervisors will be allowed to incrementally increase starting in 2020 up to a maximum 10% rate. Measure AJ advises the board to spend the majority of revenue on enforcing marijuana regulations, providing mental-health services, repairing county roads, and providing fire and medical services. The county has not finalized its plans for allocation of the tax revenue, but management indicated a portion of the revenues generated by the tax would likely be spent on roads.
Long-Term Liability Burden
The long-term liability burden is moderate, with overall debt and pensions at approximately 13% of personal income. The county participates in the Mendocino County Employees' Retirement Association, which has an estimated ratio of assets to liabilities of 73.7% adjusted by Fitch to a 7% rate of return. The county began a phased elimination of OPEBs in 2010, which was completed Dec. 31, 2013.
The county recently adopted and last updated in May 2014 a five-year capital plan (fiscals 2014 - 2018), after having been without a plan since 2006. The total budgeted capital improvements for fiscal 2017 equal $6.45 million, of which $4 million is funded through the general fund, including about $2.4 million in carryover projects.
The largest long-term cost facing the county is a remodeling or replacement of the county jail, estimated at $21 million. The county's application for a $20 million state grant for the project was denied, and the county is currently applying again. Management estimates the current facility has sufficient capacity for the next five to 10 years, and estimates the annual operating costs of a new facility at $1.5 million - $2 million (similar to the current cost).
The county's finances could become stressed in an economic downturn. Given Fitch Analytical Sensitivity Tool (FAST) estimated county total general fund revenue declines of more than 5% in a typical recession, or 3.8% less intergovernmental revenues, and the somewhat constrained ability to make expenditure adjustments, Fitch assesses the county's gap-closing capacity as only adequate. Future revenue volatility can be mitigated by the accumulation of larger reserves and retention of expenditure flexibility. Based on historical performance Fitch believes that the county, although challenged due to prior spending reductions, would make the necessary budgetary changes to maintain an adequate safety margin in a moderate economic decline scenario.
The county adopted a general fund reserve policy in 2012 that increased targets for its stabilization, counter-cyclical and emergency reserves from a cumulative 2% to 6.35% of general fund expenditures, or a minimum of $10 million. The policy also provided a mechanism for incremental additions to reserves until targeted levels are reached, which occurred in fiscal 2015. In addition, the county created a pension gap reserve with a balance of $3.65 million for the last few years. The county posted four years of surpluses through fiscal 2015, each between 5% and 6% of spending.
The county continues to make notable progress in addressing weaknesses previously cited by Fitch. Management recently met increased fund balance targets, updated treasury practices, and updated the capital improvement plan.
Additional information is available at 'www.fitchratings.com'.
In addition to the sources of information identified in the applicable criteria specified below, this action was informed by information from Lumesis and InvestorTools.
U.S. Tax-Supported Rating Criteria (pub. 18 Apr 2016)
Dodd-Frank Rating Information Disclosure Form
Copyright (c) 2016 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch's factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch's ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed.
The information in this report is provided "as is" without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers.
For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001