SAN FRANCISCO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Fitch Ratings has assigned a 'AA' rating to the following San Joaquin County Transportation Authority, CA (SJCTA) bonds:
--Approximately $200 million measure K sales tax revenue refunding bonds, series 2016 (limited tax bonds).
In addition, Fitch has affirmed the authority's measure K sales tax revenue bonds, 2014 series A (limited tax bonds) at 'AA'.
The bonds are expected to price via negotiation around Dec 1. Proceeds will be used to refund the authority's 2011 series A bonds.
The Rating Outlook is Stable.
The sales tax revenue bonds are payable from the half-cent retail transactions and use tax (sales tax) authorized by the voters in 1991 and reauthorized in 2006 and known as Measure K, net of the state's Board of Equalization administrative fee. The tax is levied throughout San Joaquin County (the county) and expires on March 31, 2041.
KEY RATING DRIVERS
Economic Resource Base: SJCTA is coterminous with San Joaquin County and is governed by a Board of Directors comprised of mayors and council members from each of the county's seven cites and supervisors from the county. The county covers about 1,448 square miles about 60 miles east of the San Francisco Bay and about 50 miles south of Sacramento.
Sound Revenue Growth: Fitch views growth prospects for pledged revenues as solid due to consistent population and employment growth in San Joaquin County, mixed income ratios and improving, although elevated, unemployment rates. The regional economy's growth is driven by the relatively lower cost of living relative to the San Francisco Bay Area and Sacramento and abundant developable land.
Security Resilient to Declines: Pledged sales tax revenues are moderately resilient to both cyclical declines and the return of historic volatility. Unaudited fiscal 2016 revenues cover MADS for existing and planned debt by 2.0 times (x).
No IDR: The authority does not own or operate a public transit system. Given the entity's relatively narrow administrative role overseeing the implementation of transportation programs funded through the Measure K sales tax, Fitch does not believe the assignment of an Issuer Default Rating (IDR) is relevant to its analysis.
Reduced Coverage: Sharp and sustained declines in pledged revenues or leveraging of pledged revenues beyond the authority's policy limitation could lead to a negative rating action.
Pledged Revenue Overview
The sales tax revenue bonds are payable from the half-cent retail transactions and use tax (sales tax) authorized by the voter-approved Measure K ordinance and levied throughout San Joaquin County (the county), net of the state's Board of Equalization (BOE) administrative fee. The tax base is broad and diverse, and Fitch views growth prospects for San Joaquin County as solid due to the likelihood of continued population and employment growth and availability of more affordable housing than the nearby Bay Area or Sacramento.
The BOE distributes the sales tax revenues on a monthly basis according to a predetermined formula with quarterly true-ups. Residual sales tax revenues following debt service payments are released to the authority for other purposes, including distributions to local jurisdictions, investments in capital projects, and administrative costs.
Security Exhibits Resilience
Legal provisions provide satisfactory protections for bondholders. They include an additional bonds test (ABT) of 1.5x maximum annual debt service (MADS) for bonds outstanding plus bonds to be issued. In addition, bondholders benefit from the authority's policy of limiting leverage to 2.0x MADS. The authority may issue up to $75 million in new money to take out a line of credit when it expires in 2019, but does not have any plans to issue new money parity bonds.
Fitch evaluates the revenue stream's sensitivity to economic downturns by considering both the estimated reduction in sales tax revenues under a 1% contraction in national GDP and the largest consecutive decline in actual sales tax revenues over the past 15 years. Current MADS coverage of 2.43x is quite resilient and has provided a large cushion against even the largest consecutive historical decline, a significant 24.6% drop from 2006-2010 during the last recession.
Fitch focused its resilience analysis on the authority's policy to maintain MADS coverage at 2.0x and Measure K's requirement that only 35% of pledged revenues be used for capital and debt. The analysis also incorporates estimated debt service associated with the planned $75 million refunding. Under this scenario, pledged revenues could withstand a 50% decline, providing a cushion more than eight times the estimated 6.2% decline in revenues in a typical recession (estimated 1% GDP decline) and two times the 24.6% largest historical decline. Given the outsized impact of the housing market collapse on the San Joaquin County economy, the rating incorporates Fitch's expectation that such a drastic decline in pledged revenues would not recur in future economic downturns.
SJCTA does not have material operations. Therefore, Fitch does not believe the assignment of an IDR is relevant to its analysis.
Additional information is available at 'www.fitchratings.com'.
In addition to the sources of information identified in Fitch's applicable criteria specified below, this action was informed by information from Lumesis and InvestorTools.
U.S. Tax-Supported Rating Criteria (pub. 18 Apr 2016)
Dodd-Frank Rating Information Disclosure Form
Copyright © 2016 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch's factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch's ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed.
The information in this report is provided "as is" without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers.
For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001