NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Fitch Ratings has affirmed the ratings for EPR Properties (NYSE: EPR), including the company's Issuer Default Rating (IDR) at 'BBB-' following the company's announced agreement to acquire the CNL Lifestyle Properties (CNL) Northstar California Ski Resort and attractions portfolio, along with providing 65% debt financing to funds affiliated with Och-Ziff Real Estate (OZRE) for the remainder of the ski portfolio. The Rating Outlook is Stable. A full list of ratings follows at the end of the release.
KEY RATING DRIVERS
EPR's planned acquisition is a credit positive for bondholders; however, the company's credit profile will remain appropriate for the 'BBB-' rating. The acquisition diversifies the ski portfolio with a premier asset in Northstar, and establishes a relationship with a leading operator in Vail Resorts. The transaction also results in immediately lower leverage and higher fixed-charge coverage, although Fitch expects the company to sustain leverage around 5.0x over the longer term.
The transaction initially improves headline credit metrics, with leverage decreasing approximately 0.5x to the mid 4.0x range, compared to 5.3x and 4.9x at year-end 2015 and 2014, respectively. Fitch expects the company will sustain leverage over the longer term around 5.0x. When including 50% of the company's preferred stock as debt, leverage increases by approximately 0.4x.
Fixed charge coverage, pro forma for the transaction, increases to the mid 3x range for the quarter ended September 30, 2016, up from 2.9x and 2.8x in 2015 and 2014, respectively. Fitch expects the company will sustain coverage around 3.0x over the longer term.
The transaction further improves tenant diversification (top 10 tenant revenue is reduced to 60% from 64% pro forma). These positives are offset by an increase in exposure to the recreation segment to 31% of NOI from 22%, which Fitch views as a slight negative given the lower mortgage financeability, and hence contingent liquidity, of this asset class.
Beyond the CNL transaction, Fitch's ratings reflect EPR's consistent cash flows generated by the company's triple-net leased megaplex movie theatres and other investments across the entertainment, education and recreation segments, resulting in maintenance of strong leverage and fixed-charge coverage metrics for the rating. EPR benefits from generally strong levels of rent coverage across its portfolio and structural protections including cross-collateralization among properties operated by certain tenants.
While cinema attendee demand has remained relatively consistent over a long time period thereby supporting the durability of EPR's operating cash flows, other investment segments lack a similar long-term track record. Credit concerns include significant, though improving tenant concentration and concerns about the company's investment in niche asset classes that are less proven and may be less liquid or financeable during periods of potential financial stress and/or have limited alternative uses.
FAVORABLE DEBT MATURITY PROFILE
Debt maturities are manageable through 2018, with no year representing more than 7.2% of total debt. Beyond 2018, maturities represent solely unsecured debt offerings which are larger in size but still mostly well-spaced. Fitch expects the company will be able to effectively ladder its debt maturity profile, which should reduce refinancing risk in any given year. Fitch expects the company to repay all of its upcoming secured debt maturities with unsecured debt, resulting in a fully unencumbered portfolio. However, in certain instances the company may assume secured debt when acquiring assets.
MINIMAL LEASE EXPIRATION RISK
From 2016 - 2029, no more than 6% of total revenue expires in any single year. EPR's education segment represents 20% of total revenue and all leases expire after 2030, with the exception of two immaterial lease expirations in 2017 and 2018.
Historically, most tenants have chosen to exercise their renewal options, which has mitigated re-leasing risk and provided predictability to portfolio-level cash flows. Over the past several years some tenants have given back space, but more recently this trend has subsided. Rent renewal spreads can vary greatly depending on the operating performance of the asset.
Fitch calculates that EPR's liquidity coverage ratio is 1.1x for the period Oct. 1, 2016 to Dec. 31, 2018. Fitch defines liquidity coverage as sources of liquidity (unrestricted cash, availability under the revolving credit facility, expected retained cash flows from operating activities after dividend payments) divided by uses of liquidity (debt maturities, development expenditures and capital expenditures).
EPR paid out 80% of its adjusted funds from operations (AFFO) in dividends in the third quarter of 2016, in-line with the past two previous years. Fitch expects the company's payout ratio to sustain in the mid-80% range on a long-term basis, and internally generated liquidity will be used in part to fund new investments.
APPROPRIATE UNENCUMBERED ASSET COVERAGE OF UNSECURED DEBT
EPR has solid contingent liquidity from its unencumbered asset pool. Unencumbered asset coverage of net unsecured debt (UA/UD) improves to just above 2x from 1.8x, pro forma for the transaction, when applying a stressed 12% capitalization rate to unencumbered net operating income (NOI). This ratio is adequate for a 'BBB-' IDR. The company continues to unencumber megaplex theatre assets, improving the quality of the unencumbered pool as EPR continues to utilize a predominantly unsecured funding model. Nonetheless, EPR's assets generally are less financeable and have fewer potential buyers than more traditional commercial real estate.
HIGH TENANT CONCENTRATION IS RECEDING
EPR's largest tenant, American Multi-Cinema, Inc. (AMC) (IDR of 'B+' with a Negative Rating Watch), accounted for 16% of pro forma total revenues in the third quarter of 2016, down from 21% the year prior. The exposure to AMC has consistently decreased since the company's inception and the company's top 10 tenants accounted for 60% of pro forma total revenue in the most recent quarter, down from 68% a year ago.
EPR's largest charter school tenant, Imagine Schools, Inc. (Imagine) accounted for 5% of total revenues in third quarter of 2016, decreasing as expected after recent sales. These sales not only reduce EPR's exposure to Imagine, but also help demonstrate some degree of liquidity in the public charter school space. The company has been expanding its relationships with new charter school operators. EPR had 48 tenants during the 2015 - 2016 school year, compared with just one tenant during the 2010 - 2011 school year.
While most of EPR's theatre leases and all of EPR's charter school leases for a given operator are cross-defaulted, a tenant bankruptcy could allow for the rejection of certain non-economic leases. Most of EPR's top tenants are either unrated or have below-investment grade ratings; thus the potential for corporate default, bankruptcy and lease rejection could reduce EPR's rental revenues. Mitigating this risk is that on a portfolio and property-level basis, EBITDAR covers rent payments by a healthy margin for nearly all of EPR's properties. Operator concentration risk is partially mitigated by the fact that the primary drivers of theatre box office consumer demand are location and which movies are showing at a particular theatre as opposed to theatre operator.
The ratings reflect EPR's focus on investing in non-core property types that are likely less liquid or financeable during periods of market stress. While the company's theatre properties are typically well located and have high-quality amenities, alternative uses of space may be limited or may require significant capital expenditures to attract non-theatre tenants. The recreation and education facilities are also high-quality but the mortgage financeability and depth of the asset transaction market of the assets is uncertain. Going forward, management intends on continuing to focus on its three investment segments which Fitch views positively. Management has a highly specialized knowledge within EPR's investment segments which helps shape the company's longer term strategy.
SOFTENING THEATRE DEMAND TRENDS
Given the limited fungibility of the real estate, Fitch considers the operating environment for EPR's key tenants. North American box office revenue has proven resilient growing at a compound annual growth rate of nearly 4% over the past 25 years. In 2015, box office revenue was up 8% from $10.4 billion in 2014, and reached a record high in nominal dollars. However, Fitch expects the exhibitor industry's attendance growth will remain challenging and ticket price growth, which had previously offset attendance declines, has been decelerating.
To counter these factors, exhibitors have been improving the customer experience through a variety of amenities such as luxury seating and new beverage concepts within the theatres has both expanded revenue streams and increased the frequency of customer visits. Moreover, EPR's theatre portfolio is 100% leased and since the company's formation in 1997, no theatre tenant has missed a lease payment. Despite the lack of lease payment defaults, EPR has realized negative leasing spreads upon renewal from time-to-time, which partially reflects the limited alternative tenants and uses for the assets.
EDUCATION SEGMENT EVOLVING
EPR is highly focused on the burgeoning market for education investments. The portfolio is 100% leased. EPR has been able to work through prior issues with Imagine, while reducing exposure to the operator, expanding to 48 operators during the 2015 -2016 school year. The demand for enhanced education at an early age has begun to outpace the supply within the U.S. as the national waiting list currently holds over 1 million students. The largest investment risk in this segment is the mismatch between the charter renewal cycle (typically every five to 10 years) and the average lease term (15 to 20 years) and the potential for charter renewals to be based on political or budget factors rather than performance factors. Alternative uses for charter school facilities should the school lose its charter and EPR need to seek an alternative tenant is largely unproven.
PREFERRED STOCK NOTCHING
The two-notch differential between EPR's IDR and preferred stock rating is consistent with Fitch's criteria for corporate entities with an IDR of 'BBB-'. Based on Fitch research titled 'Treatment and Notching of Hybrids in Nonfinancial Corporate and REIT Credit Analysis', these preferred securities are deeply subordinated and have loss absorption elements that would likely result in poor recoveries in the event of a corporate default.
The Stable Outlook reflects Fitch's expectation that EPR will operate within its targeted metrics through the rating horizon and the issuer will have sufficient capacity to address any potential tenant credit issues.
Fitch's key assumptions within the rating case for EPR include:
--Annual same-store NOI growth of 2.0% in 2016 - 2018. These increases reflect both contractual rent escalations and participation by way of overage rents;
--Annual investments between $700 - 800 million from 2016 - 2018, with a yield of 9.0%;
--CNL transaction closes in early 2Q 2017;
--No further unsecured bond issuances for 2016. $400 million and $300 million of unsecured bond issuances for 2017 and 2018, respectively;
--Annual equity issuances between $200 - 300 million from 2016 -2018 though Fitch notes issuance is at management's discretion;
--Approximately $5 million of capital expenditures each year from 2016 - 2018. Capital expenditures are low due to primarily triple net lease structure and long-term leases;
--Annual divestments between $100 - 200 million from 2016 - 2018.
The following factors could result in positive momentum in the ratings and/or Outlook:
--Fitch's expectation of leverage sustaining below 4.0x (pro forma leverage was in the mid 4x for the quarter ended Sept. 30, 2016, although Fitch expects the company to sustain leverage around 5.0x);
--Fitch's expectation of fixed-charge coverage sustaining above 3.0x (pro form coverage was in the mid 3x area for the quarter ended Sept. 30, 2016).
The following factors could result in negative momentum on the ratings and/or Outlook:
--Fitch's expectation of Leverage sustaining above 5.5x;
--Fitch's expectation of fixed-charge coverage sustaining below 2.2x;
--A liquidity coverage sustaining below 1.25x, coupled with a strained unsecured debt financing environment;
-- Meaningful, operational deterioration in the movie exhibitor and/or charter school segments.
FULL LIST OF RATING ACTIONS
Fitch has affirmed the following ratings:
--Issuer Default Rating (IDR) at 'BBB-';
--Unsecured Revolving Line of Credit at 'BBB-';
--Senior Unsecured Term Loan at 'BBB-';
--Senior Unsecured Notes at 'BBB-';
--Preferred Stock at 'BB'.
The Rating Outlook is Stable.
Additional information is available on www.fitchratings.com
Summary of Financial Statement Adjustments - Financial statement adjustments that depart material from those contained in the published financial statements of the relevant rated entity or obligor are disclosed below:
--Historical and projected recurring operating EBITDA is adjusted to add back non-cash stock based compensation.
--Fitch had adjusted the historical and projected net debt by assuming the issuer requires $10 million of cash for working capital purposes, which is otherwise unavailable to repay debt.
Criteria for Rating Non-Financial Corporates (pub. 27 Sep 2016)
Treatment and Notching of Hybrids in Non-Financial Corporate and REIT Credit Analysis (pub. 29 Feb 2016)
Dodd-Frank Rating Information Disclosure Form
Copyright © 2016 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch's factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch's ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed.
The information in this report is provided "as is" without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers.
For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001