NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Fitch Ratings has assigned an 'A+' rating to the $120 million of El Paso County Community College District (EPCC) combined fee revenue improvement bonds, series 2016. In addition, Fitch has affirmed the 'A+' rating on $43.3 million of EPCC combined fee revenue building and refunding bonds, series 2007.
The Rating Outlook is revised to Stable from Positive.
Proceeds will fund capital improvements and pay costs of issuance. The bonds are expected to sell via negotiation the week of Oct. 24.
The combined fee revenue bonds are secured by a pledge of and lien on pledged tuition fees (up to 25% under state law), a mandatory general use fee charged per semester credit hour, and interest earnings.
KEY RATING DRIVERS
SOUND FINANCIAL POSITION: The 'A+' rating is based on EPCC's consistently positive operating results, healthy reserves and demonstrated ability to manage expenses through periods of countercyclical enrollment pressure or pressured state funding. Additionally, EPCC's taxing capacity to fund O&M provides some additional financial flexibility.
NEW DEBT DRIVES STABLE OUTLOOK: New money borrowing exceeds Fitch's near-term debt expectations at prior review; the higher revenue-supported debt level is more consistent with the current rating. EPCC is expanding and renovating projects across its campuses to accommodate expected population and enrollment growth.
MARKET POSITION REMAINS SOUND: EPCC serves El Paso County (certificates of obligation rated 'AA') and Hudspeth County. Quality and student outcomes are solid. Enrollment has stabilized at manageable levels, despite good local economic performance, and is expected to grow over the near term.
MANAGEABLE DEBT BURDEN: EPCC maintains a moderate pro forma debt burden and a conservative pro forma debt structure. Legal coverage from pledged revenues is also sound, expected to remain at least 2x or better. The district has only revenue-supported debt, and there are no plans for additional revenue bonds.
ENROLLMENT: Material declines in enrollment at El Paso County Community College District (EPCC) could pressure pledged revenues if not offset by tuition and fee adjustments.
BALANCED OPERATIONS: The Stable Outlook assumes that EPCC's operating results remain strong, and that it will manage effectively through enrollment and state funding cycles. A trend of deficit operating results could lead to negative rating action.
Established in 1969, EPCC is governed by an elected seven-member board of trustees and currently has five campuses located throughout El Paso County. The district offers over 160 associate degree programs and various certificate and non-credit/workforce training programs. EPCC is fully accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools - Commission on Colleges.
PLAN OF FINANCE AND MASTER PLAN
Series 2016 improvement bond proceeds will fund approximately $105 million of capital projects focused on renovation and expansion of EPCC's five campuses in anticipation of enrollment growth over the next five to 10 years. At the same time, EPCC intends to refinance its outstanding revenue bonds with a bank placement. In that transaction, EPCC will also pay down $10 million of debt from excess reserves.
The series 2016 improvement bonds will cover two of three phases in EPCC's 2025 master plan, which was approved by its board in December 2015. EPCC expects to fund the remaining phase of the master plan around 2020 with general obligation debt, subject to voter approval. Projects will focus on renovation, deferred maintenance, workforce training facilities, and expansion of EPCC's presence at nearby Fort Bliss, one of the U.S. Army's largest installations.
SOUND FINANCIAL POSITION
EPCC has a track record of consistent positive operating results, with operating margins averaging 4.6% over the past five fiscal years. These results demonstrate strong financial management through a period of countercyclical enrollment decline and pressured state funding. Good revenue diversity and expenditure flexibility help the district maintain positive operations despite stress in an individual revenue stream.
Grants and contracts (37%) are EPCC's largest revenue source, largely reflecting federal student aid. Net tuition and fees account for about 11% of operating revenue. EPCC has rate-setting authority; it has demonstrated its ability and willingness to raise rates in response to enrollment declines and to fund capital needs. Local property taxes account for 27% of operating revenues. Revenues are supported by a growing and diversified economy with market value over $42 billion. Flexibility to raise additional tax revenues for operations and maintenance is limited by a local cap of $0.15 per $100 of taxable assessed value, versus EPCC's current rate of $0.1349. EPCC has no tax-supported debt.
Consistently positive operations have helped the district to build its financial resources. Available funds (cash and investments less certain restricted net assets) have grown 38% from $57.1 million as of Aug. 31, 2011 to $78.7 million as of Aug. 31, 2015, equal to an adequate 46% of expenses and a strong 154% of debt. Including the series 2016 improvement bonds and refunding, available funds equal approximately 50% of pro forma debt, which is acceptable for the current rating level.
SOUND MARKET POSITION
EPCC is the sole junior college provider in its service area of El Paso and Hudspeth County. The district is among the 10 largest in the state, with unduplicated headcount enrollment of approximately 30,000 in fall 2016. Enrollment has stabilized after several years of countercyclical enrollment declines driven by good economic performance. The district expects to see material enrollment growth over the next five to 10 years based on regional population growth, dual-credit expansion and initiatives to improve college-going rates. Quality and student outcomes are solid. Despite regular tuition and fee increases, EPCC remains affordable relative to federal financial aid grant levels and to local four-year alternatives.
MANAGEABLE DEBT BURDEN
EPCC's pro forma debt burden remains manageable due to substantial savings from the partial pay-down and refinancing of outstanding debt. Pro forma maximum annual debt service (MADS) will increase to about $9.3 million from about $7 million previously, offset by an increase in pledged revenue from the general use fee assessed per credit hour to every student. The debt structure will remain conservative, with all fixed-rate debt amortizing over 25 years with level debt service. Pro forma MADS as a percentage of operating revenues is moderate at 5.1%.
Pledged revenues totaled $20.4 million in fiscal 2016 (unaudited), sufficient to cover pro forma MADS by a solid 2x. In practice, the district treats one component of pledged revenues, the general use fee charged per credit hour, like a dedicated fee set aside for debt service. This fee alone generated $8 million in fiscal 2016 (unaudited); it would generate about $10.7 million per year at current enrollment levels due to a recent fee increase, enough to cover pro forma MADS by about 1.2x before including other pledged revenues. Fitch considers EPCC's ability to cover the additional debt service from existing pledged revenues a credit positive, as the district does not need enrollment growth to meet its debt service obligations. EPCC has no plans for additional revenue-supported debt.
Additional information is available at 'www.fitchratings.com'.
Revenue-Supported Rating Criteria (pub. 16 Jun 2014)
U.S. College and University Rating Criteria (pub. 12 May 2014)
Dodd-Frank Rating Information Disclosure Form
Copyright © 2016 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch's factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch's ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed.
The information in this report is provided "as is" without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers.
For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001.