NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Fitch Ratings has assigned a rating of 'AA+' to the following limited obligation bonds (LOBs) of Iredell County, NC:
--$56,470,000 limited obligation refunding bonds, series 2016
The bonds are scheduled for negotiated sale on Oct. 27. Bonds proceeds will be used to refund the series 2008 certificates of participation for debt service savings.
In addition, Fitch affirms the county's Issuer Default Rating (IDR) and approximately $99 million of outstanding GO bonds at 'AAA'.
The Rating Outlook is Stable.
The LOBs are payable from funds subject to appropriation by the county board of commissioners. They are additionally secured by a deed of trust granting a lien on the Mooresville Middle School.
The GO bonds are a general obligation of the county payable by its full faith, credit and unlimited taxing power.
KEY RATING DRIVERS
The 'AAA' IDR reflects the county's strong growth prospects, ample reserves, and broad budgetary tools. The rating on the LOBs is one notch below the IDR, reflecting appropriation risk.
Economic Resource Base
Iredell County is located in the Piedmont region of North Carolina, immediately north of Mecklenburg County. With a 2015 population of 169,866 the county's population has increased by an average annual rate of 1.3%
Revenue Framework: 'aaa' factor assessment
Revenues have been rising at a pace above U.S. GDP growth. The county has strong revenue raising flexibility as its current property tax rate is well within the statutory cap.
Expenditure Framework: 'aa' factor assessment
Expenditures have grown at about the pace of revenues, and Fitch expects that trend to continue. Moderate carrying costs and broad flexibility to manage labor-related costs allow the county solid leeway to adjust spending throughout economic cycles.
Long-Term Liability Burden: 'aaa' factor assessment
The combined burden of debt and unfunded pension liabilities is low in relation to personal income and should remain relatively stable over time based on modest future capital and issuance plans, rapid amortization and minimal pension liabilities.
Operating Performance: 'aaa' factor assessment
The county's superior budget flexibility and ample general fund balance position it to comfortably manage through economic downturns without diminishing its overall financial flexibility.
MAINTENANCE OF STRONG FINANCIAL PROFILE: The rating assumes the county's continued strong financial flexibility and budget controls.
Fitch believes that the county's proximity to Charlotte, accessibility of transportation as well as its competitive tax rate enhances its intermediate and long-term potential for expansion. The southern portion of the county has proven a desirable commuter suburb of Charlotte, particularly the area around Lake Norman.
The manufacturing sector is a key component of the local economy at 16% of county employment. Existing manufacturing companies continue to make investments in the county; ASMO (car parts manufacturer) will be investing $96.7 million over six years creating 83 new jobs and C.R. Onsrud, Inc. (machinery parts manufacturer) announced a $6 million expansion project that is expect to create 20 new jobs. Employment growth over the past four years has exceeded the state and nation. As of July 2016 the unemployment rate was 4.7%.
The county's revenue base is dominated by property and sales taxes at about 60% and 19%, respectively, of fiscal 2015 general fund revenues. Total general fund revenues are expected to increase given projected assessed value growth as a result of ongoing economic activity and home value appreciation.
The county's general fund revenue growth has trended above U.S. GDP growth, increasing at a 10-year CAGR of 4.4% through fiscal 2014. Revenue growth does include tax rate adjustments but would still be strong without them given gains in the county's assessable base due to new construction and appreciation. Revaluation occurred in 2015 with a 2% increase in valuation. Iredell County reassesses its tax base every four years, with the next revaluation beginning in 2019. According to the July 2016 Zillow report, home values are 105% of peak 2007 levels. Sales tax revenue growth has remained strong over the past five years and is projected to increase by 6% in fiscal 2016.
The county maintains a healthy capacity under the statutory property tax cap of $1.50 per $100 of assessed value with a fiscal 2017 tax rate of $0.5275.
Fitch expects the natural pace of spending growth to remain below or in line with revenue growth. Moderately low carrying costs and broad flexibility to manage labor-related costs allow the county solid spending.
The county's largest expenditure category is education at roughly 31% of general fund outlays, followed by public safety at 20%. In North Carolina counties are responsible for the funding of school capital and current expenses which does include a supplement for teachers' salaries above the state allocation.
During fiscal 2010 and 2011 the county reduced current expenses to offset a weakened revenue environment due to economic conditions. Student enrollment has been flat, increasing by less than 1% over the past decade on an average annual basis. The county's capital improvement plan does include the issuance of additional debt over the next two fiscal years to fund the construction of a higher education facility and two middle schools, which may modestly impact carrying costs.
The county's expenditure flexibility is aided by a workforce environment that is favorable to management. Employment terms are not subject to collective bargaining. As such, management has independent control of compensation and work rules.
Carrying costs associated with debt service, actuarially determined pension payments and OPEB actual contributions total a manageable 16% of governmental spending, almost entirely attributable to debt service (15.4%). Amortization is rapid at 78% in 10 years. Carrying costs include contributions to the state's Local Governmental Employees' Retirement System (LGERS) as well as contributions to several supplemental plans.
Long-Term Liability Burden
Long-term liability levels are low at 4% of total personal income. Debt levels are expected to remain low because of the county's affordable debt issuance plans. The vast majority of overall debt is issued by the county. The adopted fiscal 2017 to 2020 five-year capital improvement plan (CIP) totals approximately $81 million, of which $59 million is expected to be debt-funded compared to outstanding direct debt of $238 million after this issue. Proposed borrowings focus primarily on capital projects for Mitchell Community College and Iredell County Schools. The additional debt is not expected to materially impact the long-term liability profile.
County employees participate in the Local Government Employees Retirement System (LGERS) administrated by the state. The county's portion of LGERS is funded at 100% based on a Fitch-adjusted 7% return assumption. The county also participates in the Law Enforcement Officers' Special Separation Allowance plan. The county has been funding the plan on a pay-go basis. The net pension liability is minimal ($3.3 million). The county funds OPEB on a pay-go basis, but the unfunded liability is less than 1% of personal income
Given the county's superior inherent budget flexibility in the form of control over revenues and spending capacity, Fitch expects the county to manage through economic downturns while maintaining a high level of fundamental financial flexibility. Reserves are expected to remain above the county's 18% target -- a level of financial cushion far higher than is sufficient for a 'aaa' subfactor assessment. The unrestricted general fund balance of $42 million in fiscal 2015 was a high 26% of spending (excluding transfers out for capital and bond proceeds). The county's reserve required by state statute, which is primarily to offset accounts receivable, is an additional source of financial flexibility and increases the total available fund balance to $59.8 million or 37%.
In addition to general fund reserves the county maintains several capital projects funds, funded with transfers from the general fund. The county did increase the tax rate in fiscal 2012 and 2016 to fund future capital projects. The county plans to fund a jail expansion and the construction of a new public safety campus using these reserves. This reduces the need to issue debt and keep debt servicing costs low. As of fiscal year-end 2015 the balance was $18.3 million.
The county proved its financial resilience and strong budget management through the most recent recession by implementing furlough days for most employees except public safety, repurposing positions and maintaining vacancies among other measures. Fitch expects the county to make similar operational changes is needed during an economic downturn.
The fiscal 2016 budget was a notable 10.5% over the fiscal 2015 budget and included a tax rate increase to fund increasing debt service costs related to current and future bond issuance and cash funded capital spending. Preliminary general fund operating results show a $15.2 million operating surplus (9% of fiscal 2016 budget), which was mostly due to revenue growth resulting from the tax rate increase. Fitch believes this is evidence of conservative budgeting.
The fiscal 2017 adopted budget maintained the tax rate to $.5275 per $100 of assessed value. The 5.7% budget increase funds 17 new staff positions, a performance increase up to 3% and a 2% salary scale adjustment.
Additional information is available at 'www.fitchratings.com'.
In addition to the sources of information identified in Fitch's applicable criteria specified below, this action was informed by information from Lumesis and InvestorTools.
U.S. Tax-Supported Rating Criteria (pub. 18 Apr 2016)
Dodd-Frank Rating Information Disclosure Form
Copyright © 2016 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch's factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch's ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed.
The information in this report is provided "as is" without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers.
For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001