NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Fitch Ratings has upgraded Marfrig Global Foods S.A.'s (Marfrig) Long-Term Foreign and Local Currency Issuer Default Ratings (IDRs) to 'BB-' from 'B+' and its National Scale rating to 'A(bra)' from 'BBB+(bra)'. Fitch has also upgraded to 'BB-' from 'B+' Marfrig's senior unsecured notes and the IDR of Marfrig Holdings (Europe) B.V. Fitch has withdrawn the FC IDR of Marfrig Holding (Europe) B.V.
The Rating Outlooks for Marfrig and Marfrig Holdings (Europe) B.V. were revised to Stable from Positive.
The upgrade reflects a combination of decreased leverage and improved liquidity due to the sale of Moy Park during 2015 for USD1.5 billion, lower refinancing risk and interest expenses as a result of liability management steps taken by the company during 2016, and the expectation that free cash flow will improve materially in 2018 following the conversion of the company's mandatory convertible notes, which will lower interest expenses by BRL280 million, and an improvement in the beef fundamentals in Brazil.
A full list of rating actions follows at the end of this release.
KEY RATING DRIVERS
Fitch expects Marfrig's free cash flow to be slightly positive in 2016 improving to BRL400 million in 2017. Factors driving the improvement will be lower overall interest expenses due to refinancing, interest savings from the mandatory debt conversion to equity, and improved margins in the Brazilian beef sector as a result of an increase in the availability of cattle. Keystone continues to report improved EBITDA margin and solid growth fuelled by its international operations in Asia and low grain prices in the U.S.
Favorable Business Profile
Marfrig's ratings continue to incorporate its broad product and geographic diversification, which help to reduce risks related to disease, trade restrictions and currency fluctuation. The company is structured into two business units. Marfrig Beef (58% of EBITDA in 2015) is one of the world's largest beef producers, and Keystone Foods (42% of EBITDA in 2015) is a global supplier to foodservice restaurants chains (McDonald's represents about 58% of sales).
The appreciated Brazilian real against the U.S. dollar, the weak consumer environment in Brazil, and the high cost of cattle in that market made 2016 challenging for companies in the Brazilian protein sector. The industry is adjusting to this environment by reducing capacity in an effort to improve utilization rates. Prices have also been increasing to offset the high cost faced by protein companies. The price adjustments should drive gradual recovery in margin in 2017. Positively, Brazilian beef producers continue to gain access to more export markets.
No Major Acquisitions Anticipated
Fitch does not foresee any major acquisitions for Marfrig over the next 12 months. The company's management is focused on deleveraging its balance sheet, improving free cash flow generation and reducing interest expense. Key initiatives will be the optimization of plants and distribution by Marfrig Beef and the geographic expansion of Keystone while reducing interest expenses.
--Total revenues of about BRL19 billion in 2016;
--EBITDA margin stabilized at around 9%;
--Steady capex in 2016 compared to 2015;
--Cash interest paid reduction of BRL280 million after 2018 reflecting the conversion of the debentures in January 2017;
--Net debt/EBITDA below 3x by 2018.
A downgrade could be precipitated by Marfrig's inability to improve FCF over the next 24 months and maintain net leverage above 5.0x on a sustainable basis.
An upgrade could result from a track record of generating positive FCF, demonstrating the resilience of its group's operating margin in its Beef business in Brazil and substantial decrease in gross and net leverage to below 4.5x and 3.0x, respectively, on a sustained basis.
Marfrig's liquidity is strong after its recent divestment cycle. As of June 2016, the group held BRL5.1 billion of cash and marketable securities compared with short-term debt of BRL2 billion. The company continues actively engaged in liability management to reduce debt and interest expense. In the first half of 2016, Marfrig issued USD1 billion to repurchase senior unsecured notes due 2016, 2017, 2018 and 2020. Around 95% of the company's debt is in U.S. dollars and foreign currencies (excluding real) while 76% of its EBITDA is pegged to currencies other than the BRL.
FULL LIST OF RATING ACTIONS
Fitch has upgraded the following ratings:
Marfrig Global Foods S.A.:
--Long-Term Foreign and Local Currency IDRs to 'BB-' from 'B+'; Outlook to Stable from Positive.
--Long-Term National Scale rating to 'A(bra)' from 'BBB+(bra)'. Outlook to Stable from Positive.
Marfrig Overseas Ltd:
--Notes due 2016, 2020 to 'BB-' from 'B+/RR4'.
Marfrig Holdings (Europe) B.V.:
--Notes due 2018, 2019, 2021, 2023 to 'BB-' from 'B+/RR4'.
In addition, Fitch has upgraded and withdrawn the following rating:
Marfrig Holdings (Europe) B.V.:
--Long-Term Foreign Currency IDR to 'BB-' from 'B+'; Outlook to Stable from Positive.
The rating was withdrawn as this entity is no longer considered analytically meaningful to the credit quality of the notes it has issued. Notes issued by this special purpose entity were fully guaranteed by Marfrig, and the ratings of those issuances remain outstanding.
Additional information is available on www.fitchratings.com.
Criteria for Rating Non-Financial Corporates (pub. 27 Sep 2016)
Recovery Ratings and Notching Criteria for Non-Financial Corporate Issuers (pub. 05 Apr 2016)
Dodd-Frank Rating Information Disclosure Form
Copyright © 2016 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch's factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch's ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed.
The information in this report is provided "as is" without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers.
For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001