NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Fitch Ratings has affirmed the following St. Joseph County, Indiana bonds at 'AA-':
- $780,000 limited tax (LT) bridge refunding bonds, series 2009;
-Issuer Default Rating (IDR).
The Rating Outlook is Stable.
The bonds are limited obligations of the county payable from property taxes collected and deposited in the major bridge fund and cumulative bridge fund (the funds).
KEY RATING DRIVERS
The 'AA-' ratings are based on St. Joseph's very low long-term liability burden and solid expenditure cutting flexibility, somewhat offset by limited revenue growth prospects and the county's lack of independent legal ability to raise revenues. Management has generally supported financial flexibility during times of economic recovery and has positioned the county to maintain adequate gap closing abilities, although Fitch believes that operations could become stressed at times of economic downturn.
Economic Resource Base
St. Joseph County is located in north central Indiana, near the Michigan border, approximately 80 miles east of Chicago. South Bend, the county seat, is the fourth largest city in Indiana. The county is also home to the University of Notre Dame, which serves as a strong source of stability as taxable assessed value (AV) trends have recently rallied after multiple years of declines. The tax base has some concentration in education, health services, and manufacturing. County population levels have been stable, with the county's 2015 population at 268,441.
Revenue Framework: 'bbb' factor assessment
Fitch expects revenue performance to be generally in line with the rate of inflation, due to state tax caps that hinder the ability of the county to capture economic growth through its revenue system and limit the legal ability of the county to raise additional revenues.
Expenditure Framework: 'aa' factor assessment
The county's rate of expenditure growth is expected to be in-line with revenue growth. Expenditure flexibility is solid due to moderate carrying costs for debt service, pension, and other post-employment obligations and solid workforce control.
Long-Term Liability Burden: 'aaa' factor assessment
The long-term liability burden including pension liabilities and overall debt is low relative to personal income.
Operating Performance: 'a' factor assessment
Gap-closing capacity is adequate due to solid expenditure flexibility and rainy day fund reserves. Management makes efforts to support financial flexibility at times of economic recovery.
Improved Revenue Prospects: The rating is sensitive to the county's limited legal ability to raise revenues and limited revenue growth prospects. Changes to the county's state mandated taxing authority could improve the rating.
The county benefits from a strong local base anchored in higher education and manufacturing. The University of Notre Dame is the county's largest employer and is credited for stabilizing the local economy through investment in high-tech companies and through the creation of a large business incubator (Innovation Park at Notre Dame).
Wealth indicators are below average with median household income and per capita personal income below state and national levels. However, wealth metrics are likely negatively skewed due to the large student population. Unemployment rates are consistently above state and national averages.
The majority of the county's revenues are derived from income taxes which equal approximately 58% of total operating revenues. The second largest revenue raising category is property taxes, which comprise 19% of operating revenues.
The county's natural pace of revenue growth, absent of government policy action, is expected to be slow with year over year gains in line with the rate of inflation. General fund revenues calculated on a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) basis over the ten years through 2014 performed positively at 2.2%, despite the implementation of a circuit breaker property tax cap in 2009, which caused a decrease in property tax revenue in FY 2009 and FY 2010.
While the circuit breaker tax cap limits property tax growth, revenue growth may occur in county's other operating funds -- the local option income tax (LOIT), county income tax (COIT), and county economic development income tax funds (CEDIT) -- where income taxes are collected. Overall, Fitch believes that county will benefit from modest property and income tax gains, with results generally approximating the level of inflation.
The county's legal ability to independently raise revenues is limited. While the county has the ability to increase its local income tax rates from the current rate, this would require the support of multiple governmental bodies within the county's jurisdiction, and is therefore not in the county's independent legal control. The circuit breaker tax cap guarantees that property tax rates in overlapping districts are limited to a percentage of gross AV depending on the property classification. Property taxes are limited to 1% of AV of homestead property, 2% for other residential property, and 3% for commercial and industrial properties.
The county has the ability to raise charges for fees and services without requiring voter approval, but the revenue impact of this would be negligible.
The largest portion of the city's operating expenditures is used for personnel-related costs and equates to approximately 80% of operational spending.
Fitch expects the county's natural pace of spending growth to be in line with to marginally above expected revenue growth, given expectations for the county's revenue stream and the nature of its spending obligations. The county's expenditures are largely driven by labor force salary increases and employee benefits costs. The average increase in employee salaries and benefits has approximated the pace of inflation.
Carrying costs for pension required contributions and debt service as a percent of government spending equal an estimated 10.4% of governmental expenditures, primarily related to full actuarial funding of pension contributions. Total carrying costs would be higher if OPEB funding, detail on which is unavailable, were to be included; however, Fitch believes that the number would remain comfortably below 20% of governmental expenditures even with OPEB funding.
The county has solid expenditure cutting flexibility. Fitch believes that management has demonstrated a willingness and ability to find cost savings. For example, the county identified $1 million (0.5% of operating expenditures) in personnel savings in 2016 and is prepared to cut an additional $2 million (1% of operating expenditures) in 2018.
Long-Term Liability Burden
St. Joseph's long-term liability burden is low with the net overall debt and unfunded pension liability burden totaling 4.7% of personal income. Overlapping debt comprises 85% of the liability, with direct debt accounting for a low 6%. Approximately 88% of direct debt is scheduled for retirement within 10 years. Fitch expects the long-term liability burden to remain low.
The county participates in three defined benefit pension plans -- the Indiana Public Employees Retirement Fund (PERF), a cost sharing multiple-employer plan, and two single employer pension plans -- the County Police Retirement Plan and the County Police Benefit Plan. Management routinely funds the full actuarially required contribution (ARC) of PERF and has over funded the County Police plans in recent years. The combined plans reported an assets-to-liabilities ratio of 76.7%, assuming a 7% rate of return, as of Dec. 31, 2015.
The county has adequate gap-closing ability but is still vulnerable to financial operating challenges if faced with an economic downturn. For example, during the Great Recession the county experienced a significant decline in unrestricted reserves in 2008, in-part due to a delay in tax revenue collections. Receipt of these revenues in the following year rapidly bolstered unrestricted reserves to a level compliant with the county's 15% fund balance policy in 2009. The volatility of the county's revenue stream may cause pressure if faced with another moderate economic downturn. Fitch believes that the volatility in historical numbers may be somewhat overstated due to the county's use of cash-basis accounting and timing delays in revenue receipt.
Management makes some efforts to support financial flexibility during times of economic recovery. The use of expenditure controls post-recession have allowed for the total of all unrestricted reserves to remain above the county's fund balance policy in six of the past seven years. Unrestricted reserves in the general, LOIT, COIT, and CEDIT funds equaled 17% of operating fund spending at the end of fiscal 2015. The county routinely transfers excess from these funds to the Rainy Day Fund, which is earmarked for additional operational support; when combined with other funds, the unrestricted fund balance rises to 19.8% of operating fund expenditures on a cash basis. Fitch notes that the use of cash-basis accounting overstates the level of balance when compared to the more common GAAP-basis reports that Fitch uses in rating local governments.
Additional information is available at www.fitchratings.com
U.S. Tax-Supported Rating Criteria (pub. 18 Apr 2016)
Dodd-Frank Rating Information Disclosure Form
Copyright (c) 2016 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch's factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch's ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed.
The information in this report is provided "as is" without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers.
For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001.