NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Fitch Ratings has affirmed the following ratings for Meriden, CT (the city) at 'AA-':
--$82.4 million general obligation (GO) bonds, series 2008, 2012, 2013, 2014A and 2014B;
--Issuer Default Rating (IDR).
The Rating Outlook is Stable.
The bonds are a general obligation of the city and are payable from the city's full faith and credit and unlimited taxing authority.
KEY RATING DRIVERS
The 'AA-' rating reflects Meriden's superior budget flexibility evidenced in an unlimited legal ability to increase property taxes and a solid legal and practical capacity to adjust spending, if necessary. The rating also considers the city's sound budget management practices and moderate long-term liability. These strengths are balanced against the city's stagnant tax base and natural pace of revenue growth which could contribute to operating gaps absent policy action over time.
Economic Resource Base
Meriden covers an area of 24 square miles in central Connecticut, approximately 20 miles south of Hartford and 20 miles north of New Haven. The city is fairly mature and largely residential with a stable population over the past decade, fluctuating around 60,000 people.
Revenue Framework: 'a' factor assessment
The general fund's 10 year revenue growth rate has been below both the level of inflation and national GDP and Fitch expects continued muted revenue growth, reflecting a tax base that continues to contract. The city, like all Connecticut local governments, maintains unlimited legal taxing authority.
Expenditure Framework: 'aa' factor assessment
Fixed carrying costs associated with debt and retiree benefits are low, providing solid expenditure flexibility. Management maintains moderate legal control over wages and benefits in labor contracts and advantageous terms regarding conflict resolution and headcount.
Long-Term Liability Burden: 'aa' factor assessment
The combined burden of debt and net pension liabilities is moderate relative to personal income. The pension plans and retiree health benefits are closed to new hires, which Fitch expects to limit long-term liability growth going forward. School-related borrowing in the near term will not significantly impact the combined burden.
Operating Performance: 'aaa' factor assessment
The city maintains what Fitch considers adequate reserves levels relative to its inherent budget flexibility and revenue volatility, and has demonstrated sound budge management consistently generating modest operating surpluses.
Changes in Economic Trends: Population and economic expansion that supports a long-term expectation for increased general fund revenue growth absent policy action could support a consideration for positive rating action.
Meriden is situated in close proximity to both Hartford and New Haven. Local industry is largely focused on manufacturing and health care but there is sufficient diversity among the city's top 10 taxpayers, which comprise a moderate 8.3% of the city's fiscal 2015 tax base. . However, resident income and employment metrics tend to perform more poorly than the region and the state. Prospects for new construction and tax base growth are uncertain, however, the under-construction New Haven/Hartford/Springfield rail line which includes a $20 million station in the city (fully funded by the state) could stimulate private sector investment over time.
Property taxes make up close to 60% of general fund revenues followed by state and federal sources which may be subject to periodic shifts due to respective budgetary considerations and policy action. The city retains broad control to adjust the local component of general fund revenue and has demonstrated its willingness to make significant changes to millage rates on an annual basis in response to spending needs and tax base fluctuations.
Absent policy action, Fitch expects the natural pace of general fund revenue growth to lag both inflation and national GDP. The city's 10 year compound annual growth rate for general fund revenues is below both of these indicators and includes tax rate adjustments to compensate for tax base contraction. The most recent revaluation for fiscal 2013 resulted in a 10.25% drop in the tax base followed by smaller contractions in the two subsequent years.
The city has an unlimited legal ability to raise revenues. The yearly budget is subject to voter referendum if a successful petition is filed, but the city maintains the independent ability to implement a budget after a single referendum, if necessary.
Education is the city's largest general fund expenditure comprising around 55% of fiscal 2015 expenditures followed by public safety at approximately 19%. Given the stagnant prospects for natural revenue growth absent policy action, Fitch expects the natural pace of spending growth to be above revenue growth.
The city's expenditure flexibility is viewed as solid. Management reports education spending flexibility in both labor and operational costs and fiscal 2015 carrying costs for debt service, pension and other post-employment benefits (OPEB) payments are low at 9.3% of governmental fund expenditures.
Management has the legal ability to reduce staff at any time if necessary. Union contracts are subject to arbitration but a decision may be rejected by a two-thirds vote by city council. A new arbitration panel would then be appointed by the state and their subsequent decisions are required to take into consideration the financial capability of the employer.
State legislation was passed last year imposing a 2.5% cap on local governments' general spending growth budgets beginning in fiscal 2018. The cap limits annual increases to 2.5% over the spending level for the previous fiscal year, or the rate of inflation, whichever is greater. The cap excludes expenditures for debt service, special education, court orders and arbitration awards. There is an exception for major disasters provided there is a presidential or gubernatorial declaration of emergency. Towns and cities that increase their general budget expenditures over the previous fiscal year by an amount that exceeds this cap receive a reduced municipal revenue sharing grant. The reduction is equal to 50 cents for every dollar the local government spends over the cap. Management expects to be able to keep expenditure growth within this cap based upon recent years' performance.
Long-Term Liability Burden
The city's combined long-term liability burden for debt and pensions is moderate at 11.9% of personal income. The metric is almost equally comprised of direct debt of the city and the net pension liability related to several single-employer defined benefit pension plans.
Meriden administers three separate pension plans for its general employees, police and fire. The net ratio of assets to liabilities is 67.1% but falls to approximately 60.4% when adjusted to a more conservative 7% discount rate by Fitch. Fitch would expect to see gradual improvement in the funded position of the pension plans given reforms that have eliminated eligibility for new hires and the city's practice of fully funding the actuarially-based annual contribution.
The city plans to issue roughly $60 million of new debt in fall 2016. Fitch does not expect this upcoming issuance to materially affect the overall long-term liability level due to above-average amortization of outstanding debt of 63.7% in 10 years.
The city has maintained a general fund balance of at least 8% of expenditures and transfers out since fiscal 2011 in line with its policy of keeping one month of expenditures in reserve. Fitch views the fund balance policy as consistent with a 'aaa' level of financial resilience taking into consideration scenario-estimated changes in revenue in a moderate economic downturn and the city's superior level of budget flexibility.
After receiving a Connecticut Resource Recovery Authority reimbursement in fiscal 2009, the city has maintained adequate reserves without the deferral of required spending. The city has modestly added to fund balance in six out of the past seven years to remain in line with reserve policy levels and expects another modest surplus in fiscal 2016.
The adopted fiscal 2017 budget is balanced without reliance on existing reserves. The budget is $2.9 million (or 1.5%) higher than the previous year, largely as a result of increased debt service payments related to high school renovation borrowing.
Additional information is available at 'www.fitchratings.com'.
In addition to the sources of information identified in the applicable criteria specified below, this action was informed by information from Lumesis and InvestorTools.
U.S. Tax-Supported Rating Criteria (pub. 18 Apr 2016)
Dodd-Frank Rating Information Disclosure Form
Copyright © 2016 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch's factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch's ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed.
The information in this report is provided "as is" without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers.
For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001