AUSTIN, Texas--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Fitch Ratings has affirmed the following Cleburne, TX obligations at 'AA-':
--Issuer Default Rating (IDR);
--$32.4 million combination tax and revenue refunding bonds, series 2013;
--$8.1 million combination tax and revenue certificates of obligation (COs), series 2013;
--$11 million general obligation (GO) refunding bonds, series 2008, 2010, and 2011;
--$24.9 million taxable GO bonds, series 2016.
In addition, Fitch has downgraded $13.4 million of outstanding Cleburne 4B Economic Development Corporation sales tax revenue bonds to 'A' from 'A+'.
The Rating Outlook is Stable.
The GOs, revenue bonds, and COs are payable from a property tax limited to $2.50 per $100 of taxable value. The revenue bonds and COs are additionally secured by a de minimis pledge of net utility system revenues not to exceed $1,000.
The 4B corporation sales tax revenue bonds are secured by a first lien on a 1/2 cent sales tax levied and collected city-wide for the purposes of the corporation.
KEY RATING DRIVERS
The 'AA-' IDR, revenue bonds, COs, and GOs reflects the city's robust financial cushion, moderate fixed-costs supporting solid expenditure flexibility and manageable long-term liability burden.
The downgrade to 'A' on the sales tax revenue bonds reflects the application of Fitch's revised criteria for U.S. state and local governments, which was released on April 18, 2016, and a more focused consideration of historical pledged revenue volatility and lenient covenants.
Economic Resource Base
Cleburne is located 30 miles south of Fort Worth within the Barnett Shale natural gas play. It is the seat of Johnson County ('AA+'/Outlook Stable). The city's population growth has lagged the larger Dallas-Fort Worth (DFW) metroplex, holding steady at roughly 30,000 for the last decade.
Revenue Framework: 'aa' factor assessment
The city of Cleburne has realized strong revenue growth over the past 10 years, partly as a result of tax rate increases to offset declines in value. The city still holds ample independent legal ability to raise revenues. The 'aa' assessment incorporates the local economy's energy concentration and associated revenue-base volatility.
Expenditure Framework: 'aa' factor assessment
Solid expenditure flexibility results from strong workforce control and moderate carrying costs. Fitch expects expenditures to grow in line with revenues, but notes that debt service spending will increase materially as the city begins to pay principal and interest on recently issued debt.
Long-Term Liability Burden: 'aa' factor assessment
The long-term liability burden remains moderate relative to the resource base despite a recent issuance to fund the construction of a minor-league baseball stadium. Fitch expects the burden to remain moderate given modest tax-supported capital needs and a low net pension liability.
Operating Performance: 'aaa' factor assessment
Fitch expects the city to demonstrate a high degree of gap closing ability and financial resilience during an economic downturn based on its healthy reserves, strong expenditure flexibility and high independent revenue-raising capacity.
Contingent Risks: The rating could be pressured if general fund revenues are required to support the voter-approved baseball stadium in a manner that dilutes its financial position or flexibility.
Sales Tax Leverage: Fitch does not expect the city to leverage pledged revenues to the ABT based on use of residual revenues for operations of capital projects. However, should revenues be leveraged to the ABT, the bonds would likely be downgraded.
The city lies over the Barnett Shale play, one of the largest natural gas fields in the U.S. Weakness in valuations across the residential, commercial, and industrial sectors has been the result of decreased drilling activity due to depressed natural gas prices since 2009. Taxpayer concentration remains elevated with the top 10 taxpayers making up 21% of taxable assessed value (TAV) but has come down from a high 32% in 2009 due to declining valuations of oil/gas firms. The top taxpayer group is now diversified with construction, engineering, retail, chemical and utility industry presence.
Potential for mid-term growth in the local economy is tied to the city's proximity to the large DFW job market, as well as the effectiveness of the economic development initiatives currently underway. Access to the metroplex has been enhanced by the completion of a major arterial highway that provides a direct link to Fort Worth. The DFW employment base is extensive and the region is outperforming the nation in post-recession job, income, and population growth.
Property taxes, charges for services, and sales and franchise taxes are the predominant revenue sources for the general fund.
City officials have addressed declining revenue trends by raising the tax rate, resulting in general fund revenue growth of a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 4%, in excess of both U.S. economic performance and CPI over the 10 years through 2014. Sales tax performance was particularly weak post-recession, declining by a compound annual average of 6% from 2008-2013. Fiscal 2014 collections were strong at 10% over the prior year only to soften once again in the most recent results. Management prudently assumes no growth in the sales tax revenue stream for planning purposes given past volatility.
After a period of incremental increases, the city's ad valorem tax rate will hold steady for the fourth consecutive year at $0.804 per $100 TAV in fiscal 2017, providing ample capacity below the statutory cap of $2.50. If a proposed tax rate results in an 8% year-over-year levy increase (based on the prior year's values), the rate increase may be subject to election if petitioned by voters.
The city's largest spending area is public safety that makes up slightly less than half of the general fund budget. Spending growth in that area has trended in line with general fund expenditures, and Fitch believes it will continue to do so.
Fitch does not anticipate pressure on service levels given the city's stable population.
The city maintains adequate expenditure flexibility through strong control of workforce costs and moderate carrying costs. Fiscal 2015 carrying costs were 18.2% but are expected to rise to over 20% when the city begins paying debt service on recently issued debt.
Long-Term Liability Burden
The city's overall debt and net pension liability of $112.6 million represents a moderately low 12% of personal income, primarily composed of direct debt. Fitch does not anticipate a material change in the city's long-term liability profile in the intermediate term; management is in the process of finalizing a long-range infrastructure assessment yet reports that additional tax-supported debt will likely be minimal with the majority of general government needs addressed on a pay-as-you-go basis.
The city participates in the Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS), an agent multiple-employer defined benefit plan. Additionally, the city pays into the Firemen's Relief and Retirement Fund, a single-employer defined benefit pension plan.
Under GASB Statement 68, the city reports a fiscal 2015 TMRS net pension liability (NPL) of $17.8 million, with fiduciary assets covering 79% of total pension liabilities at the plan's 7% investment return assumption and based on a Dec. 31, 2014 valuation date. The city reports a fiscal 2015 Firemen's NPL of $10.2 million, with fiduciary assets covering 64% of total pension liabilities using an adjusted 7% investment return assumption. The Firemen's valuation date is Dec. 31, 2014. The combined NPL of both plans represents 3% of personal income. Other post-employment benefit (OPEB) requirements are modest and funded on a pay-as-you-go basis.
The 2016 general obligation bonds (sold earlier this year) were issued to fund a portion of the costs of construction of a baseball stadium. The stadium represents the city's contribution to a $100 million mixed-use project featuring retail and restaurants. The city has executed formal agreements with respect to the construction and operation of the stadium; the stadium is expected to be completed by late spring 2017.
The land acquisition and stadium construction was approved by voters by a wide margin in November 2015. Voters also approved an additional 1/2 cent sales tax levy that is allocated to the newly created Cleburne Type A Economic Development Corporation. While the bonds were issued as general obligations of the city, management plans to use the Type A 1/2 cent sales tax to pay principal and interest on the series 2016 bonds, as well as for maintenance of the ballpark once completed. Using the city's fiscal 2015 actual sales tax collections, the new 1/2 cent sales tax would generate approximately $2.8 million or 1.3x (times) maximum annual debt service (MADS) on the bonds.
The city has maintained ample reserve levels and continued to do so during their most recent economic slowdown. The last two years of audited results included fund balance drawdowns after transfers, largely due to capital spending. Unrestricted reserves at fiscal 2015 year-end were $17.3 million (28.3% of spending). The city predicts the operating results for the fiscal year that ends Sept. 30 will be slightly better than the $1.7 million budgeted deficit. Despite the drawdowns, reserves are expected to provide a high level of fundamental financial flexibility during an economic downturn.
Management has been proactive in light of the recent downturn by making mid-year budget adjustments and deferring non-critical capital plans. The fiscal 2017 proposed budget includes plan changes to lower the city's TMRS contribution, equipment acquisition for street repair, additional firefighting personnel, and no increase in water or wastewater rates.
Sales and Use Tax Revenue Bonds
The sales tax revenue bonds are payable from a senior lien on the Cleburne 4B Economic Development Corporation's 1/2 cent sales tax levied on all transactions within the city. The 4B sales tax was approved by voters in 2001 in perpetuity to fund projects and support operations that exclusively benefit the city. Fitch believes that there are solid growth prospects for this revenue stream, driven primarily by economic development initiatives underway, but it will remain vulnerable to fluctuations in natural gas prices.
Sales tax revenues have been volatile given exposure to the energy sector by way of the Barnett Shale. The revenue stream has grown at a 5% CAGR since collections began in March of 2002 but have stagnated or declined since 2009 when natural gas prices began declining.
Debt service is mostly flat and MADS occurs in 2020. Current MADS coverage is strong at 2.3x, but the city could further leverage the revenue stream up to the lenient additional bonds test (ABT) of 1.25x MADS. Given the volatility of the revenue stream and use of residual revenues for operations of various economic development projects, Fitch believes management will continue to use conservative growth assumptions for capital planning and not leverage up to the ABT.
Fitch's stress analysis tests coverage levels using the largest actual revenue decline in the review period, which was 26% from 2008-2013 in Cleburne. Assuming issuance up to the ABT, pledged revenues would fall below 1x coverage in the case of a 26% decline in collections. The previous decline in sales tax revenues was exceptional in magnitude and would not likely be repeated to equal extent given the waning influence of energy prices on the local economy. In addition, Fitch expects the city to maintain a debt service coverage cushion in excess of the 1.25x ABT. If the city leverages to 1.25x MADS, the bonds would likely be downgraded given the historical pledged revenue volatility.
Fitch does not view the pledged sales taxes as special revenues under section 902(2)(B) of the bankruptcy code, which defines 'special excise taxes imposed on particular activities or transactions' as special revenues. Therefore, the rating would be capped by an Issuer Default Rating (IDR) of the city per Fitch's rating criteria.
Additional information is available at 'www.fitchratings.com'.
In addition to the sources of information identified in Fitch's applicable criteria specified below, this action was informed by information from Lumesis, the Municipal Advisory Council of Texas, and InvestorTools.
U.S. Tax-Supported Rating Criteria (pub. 18 Apr 2016)
Dodd-Frank Rating Information Disclosure Form
Copyright © 2016 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch's factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch's ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed.
The information in this report is provided "as is" without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers.
For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001.