NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Fitch Ratings has assigned a 'AAA' rating to the following Wake County, NC general obligation bonds (GOs):
--$190 million general obligation refunding bonds, series 2016.
Bonds proceeds will be used to refund the series 2003 B&C GOs bonds and 2007 A&B GOs for debt service savings, which will eliminate all of the county's outstanding variable-rate debt. The bonds are scheduled for sale on October 18 via competitive bid.
The Rating Outlook is Stable.
The GO bonds are general obligations of the county, payable from its full faith and credit and unlimited taxing power.
KEY RATING DRIVERS
Analytical Conclusion: The county's strong economic base, historically strong operating performance and a solid revenue framework, coupled with conservative liability management and spending flexibility, all support the 'AAA' rating.
Economic Resource Base
Wake County is located in northeast central North Carolina and is part of the Research Triangle Park (RTP) metropolitan region, which encompasses the cities of Raleigh and Durham, and the towns of Cary and Chapel Hill. The county has an estimated 2015 population of 1,024,198, making it North Carolina's second most populated county.
Revenue Framework: 'aaa' factor assessment
The county has strong revenue flexibility given that the current property tax rate is less than half the cap. Also, strong assessed value (AV) appreciation has generated natural revenue growth and Fitch expects this trend to continue given solid economic prospects.
Expenditure Framework: 'aa' factor assessment
The county has significant control over spending, including the power to dictate terms of labor given the absence of collective bargaining. Additional flexibility can be found in pay-go spending and employee vacancies.
Long-Term Liability Burden: 'aaa' factor assessment
The county's overall debt position coupled with its pension liability is low as a percentage of personal income. The county prudently manages its long-term liability burden with conservative debt policies.
Operating Performance: 'aaa' factor assessment
The county's historical operating performance is resilient. Reserves remained ample during and after the recession. Given the county's revenue and expenditure flexibility and strong reserves, the county is poised to perform exceptionally well in an economic downturn.
Continued Strong Financial Position: The rating is sensitive to shifts in fundamental credit characteristics, including the county's strong financial management practices. The Stable Outlook reflects Fitch's expectation that such shifts are unlikely.
Wake's large government sector fosters economic stability and helped minimize the impact of the recession on overall employment. Additionally, the county is home to a portion of the Research Triangle Park (RTP). RTP is located between three major research universities (Duke, University of North Carolina and North Carolina State), and includes 170 global companies including IBM, DuPont, Cisco Systems and Wells Fargo, which has attracted a highly skilled employment base which translates into favorable wealth levels. Unemployment rates have outperformed the state and nation.
Median home values shows full recovery from the economic downturn. Values are currently above peak levels and strong growth is projected according to Zillow Group data.
The revenue base is dominated by property and sales tax taxes at 70% and 15%, respectively, of fiscal 2015 general fund revenues. During the recession, total revenues declined in just one year, by 2%, due to sales tax performance. Revenues have recovered solidly.
After keeping the tax rate unchanged for over a decade, the county increased the tax rate in fiscal 2015 to offset debt service cost increases and in fiscal 2016 to fund school spending increases. Due to strong taxable AV growth (6.3%) following the most recent reassessment, the county reduced the tax rate for fiscal 2017. Tax rate increases coupled with growth due to development has created strong revenue growth prospects.
The city maintains healthy capacity under the statutory cap of $1.50 per $100 of AV given the fiscal 2017 tax rate of $.6005.
The county maintains healthy expenditures flexibility with affordable spending associated with fixed carrying costs.
Management has proactively maintained spending growth in-line with revenue fluctuations.
During the recession, in response to weakened sales tax receipts, the county held the contribution to schools flat, reduced capital spending, made mid-year budget adjustments and implemented a hiring freeze, among other expenditure reduction measures.
Carrying costs associated with debt service, actuarially determined pension payments and OPEB actual contributions total 19.6%, almost entirely attributable to debt service. High debt servicing costs are offset by a rapid amortization rate of 76% in 10 years.
Long-Term Liability Burden
Debt levels are low with overall debt totaling 2.2% of market value. Given the county's rapid amortization rate of 76% in 10 years, planned additional debt is not expected to impact debt ratios.
County employees participate in the Local Government Employees Retirement System (LGERS) administrated by the state. The county's portion of LGERS is funded at 100% based on a Fitch adjusted 7% return assumption. The county also participates in the Law Enforcement Officers' Special Separation Allowance plan. The county has only been funding the plan on a pay-go basis. The funded ratio is just 6% but the unfunded liability is minimal at less than 1% of personal income. The county funds OPEB on a pay-go basis; however, the unfunded liability is also less than 1% of personal income.
An unaddressed moderate economic decline scenario shows an operating reserve cushion that Fitch judges to be well above the level needed for a 'aaa' financial resilience assessment given the county's superior revenue and spending control. Moreover, Fitch expects that in the event of such an actual revenue decline the county would maintain reserves at an even higher level. The county proved its financial resilience and strong budget management through the most recent recession by making mid-year budget adjustments, reducing cash-funded capital projects, implementing a hiring freeze and reducing staff among other measures.
The unrestricted general fund balance of $171 million was a healthy 16% of spending at year-end 2015. The county's reserve required by state statute, which is primarily to offset accounts receivable, is an additional source of financial flexibility and totaled $72 million at fiscal year-end 2015. Finally, the county maintains accessible reserves in the debt service fund that totaled a substantial $86.7 million. In sum, available reserves totaled 30.9% of spending.
Unaudited general fund operating results for fiscal 2016 show a $28.3 million operating surplus (2.5% of estimated fiscal 2016 spending). This would result in a fiscal year-end general fund balance of $272.96 million or 24% of 2016 estimated spending. Additionally, the debt service fund has an estimated $92 million of available reserves. In sum, available reserves total 32% of spending.
The fiscal 2017 general fund budget is a 4% increase over fiscal 2016. The largest increase is a $24.3 million increase in education funding. The budget reduces the tax rate and appropriates $1.2 million of fund balance (1% of the budget). Given the county's strong historical financial performance supported by conservative fiscal policies, Fitch expects fiscal 2017 will show similar results to fiscal 2016.
Additional information is available at 'www.fitchratings.com'.
In addition to the sources of information identified in the applicable criteria specified below, this action was informed by information from Lumesis and InvestorTools.
U.S. Tax-Supported Rating Criteria (pub. 18 Apr 2016)
Copyright © 2016 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch's factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch's ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed.
The information in this report is provided "as is" without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers.
For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001