Fitch: Shale Shifts Focus to Scale for Smaller Onshore E&P Cos

NEW YORK--()--The U.S. shale revolution has shifted the importance of achieving scale versus diversification for smaller high yield entities in North America, according to Fitch Ratings.

Achieving scale within a play and diversification across plays have always been important rating factors for enhancing the credit quality of smaller high yield E&Ps. However, the dynamics of shale plays have shifted in favor of scale over diversification as efficiency gains are possible in shale plays as an operator achieves scale when efficiency gains become possible.

An onshore E&P company's ability to realize efficiency gains has become increasing correlated with growth in cash flow per barrel. These gains are mainly accomplished by establishing a sizable position in a basin and achieving well completion and other cost and drilling efficiencies that can lead to enhanced growth prospects and better unit economics. Scale can also lower costs by improving negotiating leverage with service companies. Basin-focused entities tend to achieve competitive cash netbacks and full-cycle realizations despite production mix due to their ability to wring out efficiencies.

As a result, Fitch would tend to view a small high yield operator with a basin and efficiency focus more favorably than a similarly sized company spread across multiple basins with limited opportunity to improve its position on the efficiency curve. This is generally consistent with the equity market outperformance of "pure play" E&P companies relative to peers with weaker basin positions and undifferentiated opportunities.

However, basin focus does have credit quality limitations in certain situations. Fitch considers size, scale, and diversification in E&P credit ratings and places increasing importance on these factors as companies move up the ratings scale. While basin focus and efficiencies generally improve credit quality at the high yield level, they are typically not sufficient to achieve investment-grade ratings.

Additional information is available on www.fitchratings.com.

The above article originally appeared as a post on the Fitch Wire credit market commentary page. The original article, which may include hyperlinks to companies and current ratings, can be accessed at www.fitchratings.com. All opinions expressed are those of Fitch Ratings.

ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: HTTP://FITCHRATINGS.COM/UNDERSTANDINGCREDITRATINGS. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY'S PUBLIC WEBSITE 'WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM'. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH'S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE 'CODE OF CONDUCT' SECTION OF THIS SITE. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE.

Contacts

Fitch Ratings
Dino Kritikos
Director
Corporate Finance, Energy
+1 312-368-3150
70 W. Madison St.
Chicago, IL
or
Mark C. Sadeghian, CFA
Senior Director
+1 312-368-2090
or
Kellie Geressy-Nilsen
Senior Director
Fitch Wire
+1 212-908-9123
Fitch Ratings Inc.
or
Media Relations
Brian Bertsch, New York, +1 212-908-0549
brian.bertsch@fitchratings.com

Contacts

Fitch Ratings
Dino Kritikos
Director
Corporate Finance, Energy
+1 312-368-3150
70 W. Madison St.
Chicago, IL
or
Mark C. Sadeghian, CFA
Senior Director
+1 312-368-2090
or
Kellie Geressy-Nilsen
Senior Director
Fitch Wire
+1 212-908-9123
Fitch Ratings Inc.
or
Media Relations
Brian Bertsch, New York, +1 212-908-0549
brian.bertsch@fitchratings.com