NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--The manipulation of LIBOR is in the news as the rate-fixing scandal widens to other markets, following the British court settlement with the Royal Bank of Scotland, and reignites the need to reform LIBOR.
In a new research paper, Professor Marti Subrahmanyam at NYU Stern School of Business and Professors Alexander Eisl and Rainer Jankowitsch at Vienna University of Economics and Business find that an alternative rate-setting process that uses the median of the LIBOR window could significantly reduce the effect of LIBOR manipulation. Their findings also demonstrate that the alternative proposed by the Wheatley Review – to use the mean of the LIBOR window or a random draw from within the window – in fact, exacerbates the problems of LIBOR manipulation.
The paper also:
• Quantifies the present rate-setting process and compares it to several alternative rate-setting procedures
• Sheds light on the underlying manipulation incentives by quantifying their potential effects on the final rate set (“the fixing”)
• Shows the possibility for collusion between several market participants
To read the full paper, titled, “Are Interest Rate Fixings Fixed? An Analysis of Libor and Euribor,” visit: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2201013